![]() |
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 11597996)
Morning Box. What a :rolleyes:tastic day so far.
The companion upgrade process with CO has been my single biggest complaint of the OnePass program since I joined. They need to either fix or or kill it. It's poorly designed, poorly executed, and is a "no win" for anyone. In my opinion, the current system devalues the program and causes elites a lot of heart-burn. |
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11598024)
I disagree. I've used it a few times and i've never had a problem with it honestly. Though it is a benefit that I expect will only be granted once in a blue moon.
There are little gotchas, but every system has little gotchas.
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 11598029)
Really?
My IAH-ORD trip TC just posted and all I got was $5, even though there were two tickets. |
Originally Posted by rolov
(Post 11598026)
The only reason they have it on UAUA is for Barney's favorite line
"Have You met Ted" |
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 11598049)
Is it a published benefit that you get credits for every ticket you purchase (even if it is for someone else)? Sometimes I get $10 if traveling with my fiancee, but most times (like Hartmann) I only get $5. I've never chased CO down for the missing credit as I didn't know what the official policy was.
|
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 11598029)
Really?
My IAH-ORD trip TC just posted and all I got was $5, even though there were two tickets. After thinking about it I realized that it appears the $5 credits were mostly when I split the PNR for upgrade purposes. The unsplit ones where we either used miles to upgrade or were flying COEX and there was no upgrade possibility I got $10. So, my guess is it's the split that's causing the occassional $5 Travel Club credit on a PNR with two or more passengers. Another reason not to split, and just book separately from the start. |
Glad to see DL finally admitting that it's Indian call centers suck. Too bad it took them this long. DL claims offshoring those call centers saved $25 million per year. I wonder if they have any clue how much business they lost because of it?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Delta-...7481.html?.v=3 |
Originally Posted by ssullivan
(Post 11598086)
Glad to see DL finally admitting that it's Indian call centers suck. Too bad it took them this long. DL claims offshoring those call centers saved $25 million per year. I wonder if they have any clue how much business they lost because of it?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Delta-...7481.html?.v=3 |
Anyone remember what the original mileage routing rules are if CO rebooks you on a different airline with a shorter route? Monday I was scheduled ATL-IAH-BTR but CO rebooked me nonstop on DL ATL-BTR due to weather delays that would have left me stranded at IAH Monday night.
|
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11598032)
ROFL. Does that mean they'll be pulling it soon?
|
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11598024)
I've used it a few times and i've never had a problem with it honestly.
Take for example: CO forces you to split your PNR with your companion. I hate doing this in case of irr. ops, I want both myself and my companion to be reaccommodated together. You, very often (esp. in EWR), get GA's telling you they won't put your companion on the upgrade list "because there's no use." Non elites, with the new buy-up system now get the opportunity to buy upgrades before your companion can get an EUA. There are several elites out there that will do the companion dance. If both don't get it, the one person who received the upgrade will just take it upon themselves to upgrade the person sitting next to their companion, preventing the next "elite" from getting the seat (this has happened to me twice in the past year.) There is no "all or nothing" option. |
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 11598056)
But I've never met Barney.:cool:;):D:rolleyes::td::(
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 11598109)
There are several elites out there that will do the companion dance. If both don't get it, the one person who received the upgrade will just take it upon themselves to upgrade the person sitting next to their companion, preventing the next "elite" from getting the seat (this has happened to me twice in the past year.)
|
Originally Posted by MBM3
(Post 11598101)
I have been involved in offshoring for years and have found it can be a great cost savings, but not when verbal communications are required.
As for other services, yes, it can save a lot of money. But I also am disgusted when it means US-based employees of a company are laid off to be replaced with cheaper labor doing the same job from a developing country. I have had to do some training sessions for offshore developers in the middle of the night who my company hired after laying off a significant portion of our US-based development team in the past few months. I can't say I was very pleased to get up at 3:30 AM to do a 4:15 AM training session for people who were replacing friends of mine who were laid off — and these were people who knew our products inside out and had years of knowledge — that were replaced by offshore developers who had no product knowledge and were starting from scratch. Sure, it may save us some money in the short-term, why? Who really benefits from this, besides major shareholders, some top-level executives, and the developers in that foreign country? I realize we may "have" to do things like this because our competition is doing it and we have to compete. My gripe is that it ever got started in the first place, and that all types of American consumers seem more driven by cheap prices than true value and quality. |
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 11598158)
Can you explain this one a little more? I don't understand how it works.
and Pandy gets the EUA , but Mandy does not get the EUA, Pandy will just tell the person sitting next to them to take Pandy's seat , preventing the next elite belynch from going up front because it was given to the random person: Upgrade Standby List*: 1. RET, P. 2. RET, M. 3. belynch, :rolleyes:. |
Originally Posted by rolov
(Post 11598127)
He is a purple dino .
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:00 pm. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.