Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Asia > China
Reload this Page >

Current China Entry policy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Current China Entry policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2022 | 5:17 pm
  #1771  
100k
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Programs: SQ Gold, Marriott Lifetime Platinum, Caesars Diamond, Hilton Diamond, Atmos Silver, IHG Platinum
Posts: 2,229
Ummm, this thread is about entering China, not about America. Can we stay on topic please?

Also China has a CDC, which is different than the American CDC. So if you are going to write CDC please specify which one. Thanks
Cryofern likes this.
gudugan is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2022 | 6:37 pm
  #1772  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
3M
80 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,248
Originally Posted by gudugan
Ummm, this thread is about entering China, not about America. Can we stay on topic please?

Also China has a CDC, which is different than the American CDC. So if you are going to write CDC please specify which one. Thanks
Im wondering if there is going to be a time in the near future where the whole situation is reversed. Where the flights into China are almost empty and selling for cheap and the flights leaving China are full and going for $8000 a pop in economy?

At least leaving Shanghai I can see this happening soon.
joesk likes this.
travelinmanS is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2022 | 7:13 pm
  #1773  
100k
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Programs: SQ Gold, Marriott Lifetime Platinum, Caesars Diamond, Hilton Diamond, Atmos Silver, IHG Platinum
Posts: 2,229
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
Im wondering if there is going to be a time in the near future where the whole situation is reversed. Where the flights into China are almost empty and selling for cheap and the flights leaving China are full and going for $8000 a pop in economy?

At least leaving Shanghai I can see this happening soon.
Well logically let's look at people who want to enter and leave China. Right now the prices are high going into China not necessarily because there is a high supply of people wanting to enter, but because the flight routes in are severely constrained.

People who want to enter China:
  • People with direct relatives in China. A lot of people haven't bothered to visit because they can't deal with quarantine requirements.
  • Chinese citizens overseas. Same as above.
  • Business travelers. I think this population will be decreased compared to pre covid as businesses want to save on cost, but still large.
  • Students. I think a lot of students have given up already or anyone who wants to study in China will have serious second thoughts given that students can't get back in right now.
  • Tourists who aren't part of the above groups. I think this population, while not very large to begin with, is decreasing due to lessened popularity of China on the world stage.
People who want to leave China:
  • Chinese citizens who want to go on vacation overseas. This is a very sizeable number of people which will become large as soon as border restrictions are dropped.
  • Expats. This isn't that big of a population.
If the current border restrictions remain, the populations going in and out won't change much (since Chinese citizens can't get passports) so flight prices will remain the same.
If they drop all the border restrictions (and airlines increase capacity as necessary), there will be a large influx of people who want to get into China ASAP for at least the first few months. After that I imagine it will level off. There will also be a lot of people who want to leave. So overall I'd guess that flight prices in will decrease to somewhat normal levels (likely still more than the cheap prices we saw pre covid as they know customers will pay) and also the flight prices out of China will be elevated, but not overly expensive.
joesk likes this.
gudugan is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2022 | 8:50 pm
  #1774  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 275
Originally Posted by STS-134
...and second, you can test negative and still be infected....
got it. CDC is a failure because they are suspending testing requirements for a population that is already over tested, and the CDC should continue to demand testing of the over tested population because you can test negative and still be infected.

Seriously...makes perfect sense.
Topcare and gudugan like this.
pruss2ny is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 1:58 am
  #1775  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Programs: UA Premier Platinum, DL Platinum
Posts: 649
I just booked an award ticket on United, WAS-EWR-PVG-SIN-CNS (Cairns), for December because it was by far the cheapest way to get to Australia in business. (Yes, it is a ridiculous routing.) My strong hope is that a non-Chinese routing comes up (partly general aversion to being within Chinese jurisdiction). If not, I'm hoping that Chinese health restrictions loosen by December. But, given the CCP's handling of Shanghai, I put my chances of taking that routing at about 10% (and, as I get closer, probably 5%), to the point that I'm really hoping that, if all else fails, I miss my very tight connection in EWR and get re-routed via HND to SIN (or, better yet, just sent to SYD. I'll eat the cost of a new ticket to Cairns).

As for the various comments here about how bad America's government is: I will merely point out that Americans are entirely within their right to mitigate their risk, that the vast majority of recent covid-19 deaths have been among those who choose not to get vaccinated despite being physically fit to do so (and, I suspect, also forgo various other reasonable precautions), and that it is within the control of most Americans to mitigate their risk to a degree that the chance of dying from the disease is reducible to almost negligible levels, even for older Americans. So the "who cares about starving in Shanghai when everywhere else is a warzone" narrative is false. I will abstain from deriding the idea of relying on Chinese state mortality data, or the odd notion that most Americans considered our immediate past president the best president ever.
MW147 likes this.
ezefllying is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 6:45 am
  #1776  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
3M
80 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,248
Originally Posted by ezefllying
I just booked an award ticket on United, WAS-EWR-PVG-SIN-CNS (Cairns), for December because it was by far the cheapest way to get to Australia in business. (Yes, it is a ridiculous routing.) My strong hope is that a non-Chinese routing comes up (partly general aversion to being within Chinese jurisdiction). If not, I'm hoping that Chinese health restrictions loosen by December. But, given the CCP's handling of Shanghai, I put my chances of taking that routing at about 10% (and, as I get closer, probably 5%), to the point that I'm really hoping that, if all else fails, I miss my very tight connection in EWR and get re-routed via HND to SIN (or, better yet, just sent to SYD. I'll eat the cost of a new ticket to Cairns).

As for the various comments here about how bad America's government is: I will merely point out that Americans are entirely within their right to mitigate their risk, that the vast majority of recent covid-19 deaths have been among those who choose not to get vaccinated despite being physically fit to do so (and, I suspect, also forgo various other reasonable precautions), and that it is within the control of most Americans to mitigate their risk to a degree that the chance of dying from the disease is reducible to almost negligible levels, even for older Americans. So the "who cares about starving in Shanghai when everywhere else is a warzone" narrative is false. I will abstain from deriding the idea of relying on Chinese state mortality data, or the odd notion that most Americans considered our immediate past president the best president ever.
I give your itinerary a 5% chance of happening in December 2023. There is a 0% chance of it working this year.
uanj, joesk, m.y and 2 others like this.
travelinmanS is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 7:39 am
  #1777  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United Global Services and 1MM, Marriott Titanium, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 10,302
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
I give your itinerary a 5% chance of happening in December 2023. There is a 0% chance of it working this year.
You are too optimistic. How about this:

5% chance of happening in December 2030. 0% chance by 2025.
m.y, Topcare and gudugan like this.
kb1992 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 9:31 am
  #1778  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SIN (with a bit of ZRH sprinkled in)
Programs: KrisFlyer Gold
Posts: 9,605
Not everyone should try to be a Comedian..

I can see them relaxing rules and „living with covid“ over the next months, albeit they won’t call it that way.
gudugan likes this.
YuropFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 10:36 am
  #1779  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 7,295
Originally Posted by pruss2ny
got it. CDC is a failure because they are suspending testing requirements for a population that is already over tested, and the CDC should continue to demand testing of the over tested population because you can test negative and still be infected.

Seriously...makes perfect sense.
CDC has been a failure the whole time. It never made sense in the first place to require testing on int'l flights but allow people to take domestic flights without having to test at all. Either get rid of the requirement or apply it to all flights. But now they have a further contradiction in that they suspended the requirements from an area experiencing a big surge, but still have them in place for people coming from areas without surges.

If testing people determined whether they have the virus or not with 100% certainty, then all we'd have to do is test everyone simultaneously once and we'd be able to completely stop it.
STS-134 is online now  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 12:33 pm
  #1780  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,934
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
They are doing a favor to those of us trying to get food in Shanghai. Its a humanitarian gesture that the state department asked the CDC to allow.

I dont think its idiotic at all and I think every country that has these entry requirements should wave them for their citizens trying to escape the madness that is shanghai.
I believe the US CDC should just get rid of the requirement. Instead of saying this is a 'humanitarian gesture' just realize the stupidity of it.
Like how customer service agents will say 'this is a one time exception' instead of the company changing its stupid policies.

​​​​​
pruss2ny likes this.
s0ssos is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 1:16 pm
  #1781  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,934
Originally Posted by STS-134
CDC has been a failure the whole time. It never made sense in the first place to require testing on int'l flights but allow people to take domestic flights without having to test at all. Either get rid of the requirement or apply it to all flights. But now they have a further contradiction in that they suspended the requirements from an area experiencing a big surge, but still have them in place for people coming from areas without surges.

If testing people determined whether they have the virus or not with 100% certainty, then all we'd have to do is test everyone simultaneously once and we'd be able to completely stop it.
And does the CDC require a negative COVID test for Ukraine refugees? I would hope not. But I do hear about refugees being prevented from entering for ... (no idea).
Unfortunately this lack of human sympathy seems to pervade the US government. Using an analogy from China, would one prevent an elderly person who is seriously ill from getting into the hospital because there is no negativr covid test yet?
s0ssos is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 3:43 pm
  #1782  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 7,295
Originally Posted by s0ssos
And does the CDC require a negative COVID test for Ukraine refugees? I would hope not. But I do hear about refugees being prevented from entering for ... (no idea).
Unfortunately this lack of human sympathy seems to pervade the US government. Using an analogy from China, would one prevent an elderly person who is seriously ill from getting into the hospital because there is no negativr covid test yet?
If the policy is that people need a negative test to enter the US (to protect people against SARS-CoV-2 variants), then the proper humanitarian gesture is to allow refugees in (whether from Ukraine or Shanghai), then test them on entry and segregate them from the general population until the test results come back. The virus doesn't discriminate in who it infects and if there needs to be a policy of testing everyone, then exceptions should not be made for refugees, except to let them in, test them on entry, and not bill them for being tested or quarantined. If on the other hand the humanitarian gesture is to allow refugees to not be tested and just walk into the general population, then that is an indication that no one needs to be tested at all, and the CDC should drop the requirement entirely.
pruss2ny likes this.

Last edited by STS-134; Apr 17, 2022 at 3:55 pm
STS-134 is online now  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 4:28 pm
  #1783  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
3M
80 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,248
Originally Posted by YuropFlyer
Not everyone should try to be a Comedian..

I can see them relaxing rules and living with covid over the next months, albeit they wont call it that way.
Hopefully the geniuses at the top do it soon. Im running low on food now.
travelinmanS is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 5:00 pm
  #1784  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Thanks for the Memories !!!
Posts: 10,735
I have a question , does the Shanghai lockdown extend to the places that abut the metropolitan area? If so , how far ? I've been trying to get in touch with an acquaintance and haven't been able to reach them. TIA.
Q Shoe Guy is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2022 | 8:53 pm
  #1785  
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HNL
Posts: 1,165
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
I have a question , does the Shanghai lockdown extend to the places that abut the metropolitan area? If so , how far ? I've been trying to get in touch with an acquaintance and haven't been able to reach them. TIA.
The Shanghai lockdown itself ends at the border, but many other cities (including ones that abut Shanghai) have varying degrees of lockdown.

But, even if locked down (or even put in central quarantine), people should have access to the phone, etc.
YariGuy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.