Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

CX WILL interline to other oneworld airlines if travelling on separate PNRs

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 12, 2016, 10:18 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: Calchas
As of 1 January 2017, CX will interline on separate tickets to their airline partners once again.

to 31 Dec 2016 CX Agents' advisory http://www.cxagents.com/cxa/gc/en_HK/ln2
from 1 Jan 2017 http://www.cathaypacific.com/cx/en_H...e-tickets.html

Ausbt article: http://www.ausbt.com.au/cathay-pacif...-baggage-rules
http://www.ausbt.com.au/did-oneworld...of-a-nightmare
http://www.ausbt.com.au/oneworld-air...ecting-flights

AA: will not check through separate PNRs (own or partner) https://ssc.aa.com/prmportal_enu/Age...%20Tickets.pdf
MH: still check through two PNRs (own or partner)
CX/KA: check through CX/KA separate PNRs. Will resume checking through to partners starting 1 Jan 2017 http://www.cathaypacific.com/cx/en_H...e-tickets.html
JL: Will through check. http://www.jal.co.jp/en/info/inter/161003.html
QR: will check through separate PNRs (own or partner) from 01 MAR. https://www.ausbt.com.au/qatar-airways-ditches-oneworld-s-restrictive-baggage-rules
QF: Will check through QF to QF separate PNRs, will not check through partner separate PNRs (from 1 Sep 2016)
BA: Will not check through partner or other airlines' separate PNRs. WIll not check through BA-BA on seperate PNR's (as of 15 Nov 16)
IB: Will check through IB to IB separate PNRs
LA: will not check through separate PNRs (own or partner)
AY: Will check through AY to AY separate PNRs, will not check through partner separate PNRs
Print Wikipost

CX WILL interline to other oneworld airlines if travelling on separate PNRs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2016, 9:20 pm
  #256  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ORD [formerly] + HKG
Programs: CX Diamond, AA exExPlat, BAEC exGold, HH Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Starriott Titanium, GE
Posts: 2,966
Originally Posted by jkuok
Forgot to mention one is AA redemption and the other is a BA redemption so its not CX to CX
It is still CX-CX. As I said, CX-CX protection is stock neutral. However, your key issue is if CX will budge with the MCT.

Also, 840 arrival into JFK T7 is subject to long waiting at CBP (even with GE) so it's a highly YMMV situation I'd say.
G-CIVC is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2016, 5:41 am
  #257  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 498
Originally Posted by G-CIVC
It is still CX-CX. As I said, CX-CX protection is stock neutral. However, your key issue is if CX will budge with the MCT.

Also, 840 arrival into JFK T7 is subject to long waiting at CBP (even with GE) so it's a highly YMMV situation I'd say.
then i should change my flight and have 1 day in between?
Guess I will visit New York
jkuok is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2016, 6:18 am
  #258  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by jkuok
Does this mean I have to collect my bags clear immigration and then check in again?
You would have had to do this anyway.

Originally Posted by jkuok
Well 1905 to 2100 is just a little less than 2 hours, I honestly don't know if its a legal connection for JFK
The MCT is two hours. But this is not really a "connection" because you have two tickets.

I think there is a fair chance of you missing your onward flight.
Calchas is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2016, 10:15 pm
  #259  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
You wont make it unless you are canadian or american
kaka is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2016, 12:02 am
  #260  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX MPC
Posts: 592
Originally Posted by kaka
You wont make it unless you are canadian or american
Agree it's risky, but certainly not impossible even if you're not Canadian or American (which I'm not). One factor would be whether Cathay gives you an "express connection pass" that allows you to jump the queues at security and passport control in JFK. I was proactively given one of these express passes when I connected between a CX flight and an AA flight on separate tickets earlier this year, with the result that I made it to the gate for my AA flight in Terminal 8 (complete with checked baggage) only 35 minutes after landing at Terminal 7. That was before the change of policy on interlining to other 1W airlines, so presumably they wouldn't give you an express pass for CX-AA on separate tickets now. But since there's been no change of policy as far as interlining between CX flights (and, as pointed out earlier, it's the operating carrier that counts), I don't see why they wouldn't continue to hand out express passes in your case.
dannyhk is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2016, 1:26 am
  #261  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by dgittings
But since there's been no change of policy as far as interlining between CX flights (and, as pointed out earlier, it's the operating carrier that counts), I don't see why they wouldn't continue to hand out express passes in your case.
It is below MCT. CX needs not take the risk of checking in the passenger for the second leg.
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2016, 5:24 am
  #262  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX MPC
Posts: 592
Originally Posted by cxfan1960
It is below MCT. CX needs not take the risk of checking in the passenger for the second leg.
Yes, but since it's on a separate ticket there's nothing to stop you checking in online for the second leg first, printing your boarding pass and then showing it to the check in clerk when you go to the airport to check in for the first leg (on the other ticket). That's what I did, and then they gave me the express connection pass (which just helps you get jump the queues, I don't think it means Cathay accept any liability if you end up missing your connecting flight).
dannyhk is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2016, 6:56 am
  #263  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 498
Originally Posted by dgittings
Yes, but since it's on a separate ticket there's nothing to stop you checking in online for the second leg first, printing your boarding pass and then showing it to the check in clerk when you go to the airport to check in for the first leg (on the other ticket). That's what I did, and then they gave me the express connection pass (which just helps you get jump the queues, I don't think it means Cathay accept any liability if you end up missing your connecting flight).
Thanks, I might give that a try

I have 3 bags, so I guess i have no choice but to stay one night at jfk
jkuok is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2016, 5:41 pm
  #264  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by dgittings
Yes, but since it's on a separate ticket there's nothing to stop you checking in online for the second leg first, printing your boarding pass and then showing it to the check in clerk when you go to the airport to check in for the first leg (on the other ticket). That's what I did, and then they gave me the express connection pass (which just helps you get jump the queues, I don't think it means Cathay accept any liability if you end up missing your connecting flight).
That's true. It is not their problem anymore.
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2016, 6:13 am
  #265  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,542
All - DADHKG on KA, HKGJFK on CX, 5 hr layover, separate PNRs.

Unclear whether DAD will check bags all the way through.

In the event I have to claim/recheck in HKG, does the entire party have to show? We are a party of four, guessing 5-7 bags in total, flying F and J with OWE status for me. I'd much rather send my wife and kids to the Pier (J side, until I arrive to rescue them and bring the clan to F).

My concern is if I show at the ticket counter with 7 bags, they may say something like "everyone in your party has to be here". Which would suck.

Any experience with this?
jamienbaker is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2016, 6:29 am
  #266  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,172
Originally Posted by jamienbaker
All - DADHKG on KA, HKGJFK on CX, 5 hr layover, separate PNRs.

Unclear whether DAD will check bags all the way through.

In the event I have to claim/recheck in HKG, does the entire party have to show? We are a party of four, guessing 5-7 bags in total, flying F and J with OWE status for me. I'd much rather send my wife and kids to the Pier (J side, until I arrive to rescue them and bring the clan to F).

My concern is if I show at the ticket counter with 7 bags, they may say something like "everyone in your party has to be here". Which would suck.

Any experience with this?
I thought it is that CX/KA separatet pnrs are fine? Even wiki says so?
IncyWincy is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2016, 6:37 am
  #267  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,542
Originally Posted by IncyWincy
I thought it is that CX/KA separatet pnrs are fine? Even wiki says so?
My interpretation as well. But I'm big on contingency planning. Heck, I'm the guy that hires a chase car to the airport
jamienbaker is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2016, 8:49 am
  #268  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC/SIN
Programs: CX DM, SQ KF
Posts: 2,171
Angry

Originally Posted by jamienbaker
My interpretation as well. But I'm big on contingency planning. Heck, I'm the guy that hires a chase car to the airport
Plan A) just ask at DAD (done a few times since policy change, no issue except the one time it took them 5mins to find the onward booking..that was the one time when OLCI did not show up both segments- separate bookings- together)
Plan B) turn up at DAD Checkin at opening hour, printout of the relevant info from the cxagents website in hand (been posted on here)
Plan C) you go landslide, party goes to Pier J, both stay in touch over the free HKIA wifi for contingencies, where the landslide F check-In team and the lounge crew can be put in synch...worst case, there's enough time for the party to be escorted landside.

ETA: I have *no* clue where that angry face smiley came from!! Apologies.
jagmeets is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2016, 8:56 am
  #269  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,542
Originally Posted by jagmeets
Plan A) just ask at DAD (done a few times since policy change, no issue except the one time it took them 5mins to find the onward booking..that was the one time when OLCI did not show up both segments- separate bookings- together)
Plan B) turn up at DAD Checkin at opening hour, printout of the relevant info from the cxagents website in hand (been posted on here)
Plan C) you go landslide, party goes to Pier J, both stay in touch over the free HKIA wifi for contingencies, where the landslide F check-In team and the lounge crew can be put in synch...worst case, there's enough time for the party to be escorted landside.

ETA: I have *no* clue where that angry face smiley came from!! Apologies.
All good, sounds like an excellent plan. Should I need to retrieve and recheck, the only wrinkle is wife if in F, 2 kids in J, and I'm in J with OWE status. Doubtful she can talk her way into the F Pier/Wing with a copy of my BP, explaining I'm taking care of bags. But the kids are old enough, she can leave them in J and head over to F is she really can't wait

Safe travels, and thank you for taking time to respond.

Best, Jamie
jamienbaker is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2016, 8:56 am
  #270  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,172
Originally Posted by jagmeets
Plan A) just ask at DAD (done a few times since policy change, no issue except the one time it took them 5mins to find the onward booking..that was the one time when OLCI did not show up both segments- separate bookings- together)
Plan B) turn up at DAD Checkin at opening hour, printout of the relevant info from the cxagents website in hand (been posted on here)
Plan C) you go landslide, party goes to Pier J, both stay in touch over the free HKIA wifi for contingencies, where the landslide F check-In team and the lounge crew can be put in synch...worst case, there's enough time for the party to be escorted landside.

ETA: I have *no* clue where that angry face smiley came from!! Apologies.
Jagmeets, your landslide (x2) were obviously slips
Thank you as always for your input.
IncyWincy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.