Upgrade still waitlisted even though R (now PZ) class is available {Archive}
#767
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: JZRO
Posts: 9,169
From anyone else I would consider this dialogue a facetious work of art, but not from a man as literal as you. Still, your one-act play should have ended with no one on the wait-list clearing, because all your do-good customer succeeded in doing was to allow someone else to pull the upgrade out from under those sainted people waiting.
#768
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 10,346
Wow. My post incited two pages of thread so far and we are all at odds on what's the right solution. I posted the "right" solution in that the computers do this automatically, and "immediately", when R>0. Since we know that will never happen then maybe UA should just upgrade the 'next in line' when someone calls. But that also brings up another point...UA probably doesn't want to do that. Remember guys, they are in the business of selling tickets, not upgrading tickets. Therefore, if they can keep R>0 as long as possible they can absolutely sell more tickets to people who are willing to use miles/GPU/RPU for upgrades. It's a selling tactic. "Mr. Customer, I see you are buying that ticket channa mentioned from EWR to LHR. Did you know there's one upgrade seat open right now?"
Anyway, back to the original post, I have a few more questions:
1. Why did it take them 20 minutes to figure out I was #7 on the waitlist? BTW...I assume the agent gave me factual information and didn't run off to the bathroom, do her nails and then come back and make it up on the spot.
2. Why can they suddenly give you exact, detailed information about your waitlist spot but if you call and ask where you are on the list the agent will say, "I have no idea and I can't get that info"?
I will say I have absolutely no ethical qualms about what I did. It absolutely is an every-man-for-himself game now at UA. So I'm going to play to my advantage every single time. You can bet on it.
But I think my new game plan is super simple...if I see R>0 I will call and just ask them to remove the GPU request. No harm, no foul and no asking for them to process my upgrade. Then I'll go online and process the upgrade myself. United wants to be a self-service airline then I will self-service. Thank you very much.
PS - I understand the "remove the GPU" only works if other segments haven't already cleared and are now at R=0. I agree with bonehead...it's not worth the risk of hoping the inventory goes back into "R" if you give up the seat. So you have to worry about the longer segment with this methodology.
-RM
Anyway, back to the original post, I have a few more questions:
1. Why did it take them 20 minutes to figure out I was #7 on the waitlist? BTW...I assume the agent gave me factual information and didn't run off to the bathroom, do her nails and then come back and make it up on the spot.
2. Why can they suddenly give you exact, detailed information about your waitlist spot but if you call and ask where you are on the list the agent will say, "I have no idea and I can't get that info"?
I will say I have absolutely no ethical qualms about what I did. It absolutely is an every-man-for-himself game now at UA. So I'm going to play to my advantage every single time. You can bet on it.
But I think my new game plan is super simple...if I see R>0 I will call and just ask them to remove the GPU request. No harm, no foul and no asking for them to process my upgrade. Then I'll go online and process the upgrade myself. United wants to be a self-service airline then I will self-service. Thank you very much.
PS - I understand the "remove the GPU" only works if other segments haven't already cleared and are now at R=0. I agree with bonehead...it's not worth the risk of hoping the inventory goes back into "R" if you give up the seat. So you have to worry about the longer segment with this methodology.
-RM
#769
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NorCal - 1K 2MM
Posts: 2,089
But I think my new game plan is super simple...if I see R>0 I will call and just ask them to remove the GPU request. No harm, no foul. Then I'll go online and process the upgrade myself. United wants to be a self-service airline then I will self-service. Thank you very much.
-RM
-RM
#770
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 10,346
The only issue I have with this is, it always seems that I'm down to my final RPU or GPU pledged in the waitlist when this happens. So I don't have a second one waiting in the bank to upgrade with after the first is removed, and one can't depend on how long the first one takes to recredit. Or am I missing something here?
-RM
#771
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,480
It's a selling tactic. "Mr. Customer, I see you are buying that ticket channa mentioned from EWR to LHR. Did you know there's one upgrade seat open right now?"
The only issue I have with this is, it always seems that I'm down to my final RPU or GPU pledged in the waitlist when this happens. So I don't have a second one waiting in the bank to upgrade with after the first is removed, and one can't depend on how long the first one takes to recredit. Or am I missing something here?
#772
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Programs: AS 75K,UA Gold 1.6MM, Hilton Dia, Marriott LT Plat, Hyatt Glb, Natl Exec, Hertz 5*
Posts: 3,657
...another couple simple IT fixes UA can do for this:
1) Give agents a command to force the upgrade sweep. This will clear the next R people. Maybe such a command exists?
2) When making an upgrade request (online or by agent), only clear if R>0 AND waitlist = 0, otherwise add to waitlist.
Again, not hard...
1) Give agents a command to force the upgrade sweep. This will clear the next R people. Maybe such a command exists?
2) When making an upgrade request (online or by agent), only clear if R>0 AND waitlist = 0, otherwise add to waitlist.
Again, not hard...
#773
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
...another couple simple IT fixes UA can do for this:
1) Give agents a command to force the upgrade sweep. This will clear the next R people. Maybe such a command exists?
2) When making an upgrade request (online or by agent), only clear if R>0 AND waitlist = 0, otherwise add to waitlist.
Again, not hard...
1) Give agents a command to force the upgrade sweep. This will clear the next R people. Maybe such a command exists?
2) When making an upgrade request (online or by agent), only clear if R>0 AND waitlist = 0, otherwise add to waitlist.
Again, not hard...
You're assuming reasonably modern architecture and that you have access to all systems.
For all we know, the waitlist clearing application runs after hours on a legacy box at the FreshBrew data center -- the same box that manages the coffee bean blending application by day. It's some time-share arrangement that Gordon worked out with his buddies at FreshBrew .
#774
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC and SFO
Programs: UA 1MM (former 1K, Delta Platinum))
Posts: 1,244
AArgh.
Last edited by Syzygies; Nov 21, 2014 at 1:08 am
#775
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Programs: MYOB
Posts: 1,292
As a former co-worker now deceased (RIP) used to say: "Friendship ends at the gate"
The R Class roulette is a thing of beauty. You just have to know the rules, and how to play. For those that don't...see you as you walk past to take your seat in coach.
R Class ought to clear to the next person in line when it becomes available...and could be acomplished. For those of you that foolishly blame SHARES..... try looking a little deeper to those who are most interested in selling the upgrades. SHARES is doing EXACTLY what it has been programmed to. No More....no less. It's "chan-tastic"
The R Class roulette is a thing of beauty. You just have to know the rules, and how to play. For those that don't...see you as you walk past to take your seat in coach.
R Class ought to clear to the next person in line when it becomes available...and could be acomplished. For those of you that foolishly blame SHARES..... try looking a little deeper to those who are most interested in selling the upgrades. SHARES is doing EXACTLY what it has been programmed to. No More....no less. It's "chan-tastic"
Last edited by xzh445; Nov 20, 2014 at 8:59 pm
#776
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: 1K
Posts: 784
Reading through this thread really makes me wonder... what is so darn hard about clearing upgrades when R>0 becomes available? While I understand that UA's database must be massively large and beyond my expertise, one would think that there would be a solution. In the applications that I deal with, a simple trigger "on update" would be sufficient to call something to properly handle the upgrade waitlist. Is the bulk of data so large that this isn't feasible?
#777
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NorCal - 1K 2MM
Posts: 2,089
Reading through this thread really makes me wonder... what is so darn hard about clearing upgrades when R>0 becomes available? While I understand that UA's database must be massively large and beyond my expertise, one would think that there would be a solution. In the applications that I deal with, a simple trigger "on update" would be sufficient to call something to properly handle the upgrade waitlist. Is the bulk of data so large that this isn't feasible?
#778
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Reading through this thread really makes me wonder... what is so darn hard about clearing upgrades when R>0 becomes available? While I understand that UA's database must be massively large and beyond my expertise, one would think that there would be a solution. In the applications that I deal with, a simple trigger "on update" would be sufficient to call something to properly handle the upgrade waitlist. Is the bulk of data so large that this isn't feasible?
#779
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 10,346
...another couple simple IT fixes UA can do for this:
1) Give agents a command to force the upgrade sweep. This will clear the next R people. Maybe such a command exists?
2) When making an upgrade request (online or by agent), only clear if R>0 AND waitlist = 0, otherwise add to waitlist.
Again, not hard...
1) Give agents a command to force the upgrade sweep. This will clear the next R people. Maybe such a command exists?
2) When making an upgrade request (online or by agent), only clear if R>0 AND waitlist = 0, otherwise add to waitlist.
Again, not hard...
So rather than calling and alerting UA that R>0 and they hit some button to upgrade lucky passenger #1 on the waitlist at that moment you should continue to play the upgrade roulette and simply take it yourself if you can have the agent de-book your request quickly enough so you can grab it online.
-RM
#780
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,029
The problem with this is then the game can still be played using my now tried & true method. Simply call and ask for your GPU to be re-deposited. No questions asked. Once it's been removed from your reservation you can go online and still snag the upgrade.
So rather than calling and alerting UA that R>0 and they hit some button to upgrade lucky passenger #1 on the waitlist at that moment you should continue to play the upgrade roulette and simply take it yourself if you can have the agent de-book your request quickly enough so you can grab it online.
-RM
So rather than calling and alerting UA that R>0 and they hit some button to upgrade lucky passenger #1 on the waitlist at that moment you should continue to play the upgrade roulette and simply take it yourself if you can have the agent de-book your request quickly enough so you can grab it online.
-RM
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Nov 29, 2014 at 5:30 am Reason: Merge