![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Steph3n
(Post 11678576)
so you aren't having the same delays the real companies have, producing only 1-2 aircraft per year? :D
|
Originally Posted by AMF in NJ
(Post 11672572)
Don't feel too bad, Plus1 didn't make his upgrade either. :eek::eek:
|
Originally Posted by xyzzy
(Post 11678140)
I ate breakfast at Hash House A Go Go in La$ Vega$ the other day. They have an item on their breakfast menu that you may be interested in. It is listed like this:
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 11678197)
It's always have been two days. UPS would tease me by keeping it in the Edison distribution center one day. I got my new PowerPoint remote that replaces the one that "walked" at the Brooklyn Marriott
|
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11678568)
I'm leaning in my case it's every 6-9 months.
I'm not sure what version of Windows you're using, but even just keeping up on Windows updates kills a machine over time. To defend MS blatantly is just wrong. I'm not a mac fan-boy by any means. I do like the fact that they put a nice UI on a Unix box, that was the one thing lacking. And, no, the linuxes of the world don't count. I do not blindly support every MS move, linux move, bsd move, etc, and I do not blindly say every apple move is wrong (I said one of their best moves was stopping mac clones to have quality hardware just a bit ago) |
It's Hot in here!
It's about 90 degrees in the P-Club in EWR. Yikes.
|
Originally Posted by Plus1
(Post 11678620)
It's about 90 degrees in the P-Club in EWR. Yikes.
|
Originally Posted by Plus1
(Post 11678602)
I made HGK-EWR, I'm getting hosed on EWR-IAH. :( Been #1 for days, just slid to #4 with no seats left.
|
Originally Posted by Steph3n
(Post 11678616)
I have well over 600 machines under my management in the last 10 years, and I have had exactly 4 that died on a windows update, I have had a linux upate or two go worse, and even a freebsd. I have no more windows 2000, but it too was solid, I have many 2003, XP, numerous Vista, 2008 CLI, 2008 full, and a new windows 7.
I've managed a slew of machines over the last 20 years and by far the Windows and Linux ones have always been a problem.
Originally Posted by Steph3n
(Post 11678616)
No defending MS is not wrong, just like acting like linux doesn't exist is wrong...linux does exist and it is not a terrible kernel or base, it may not be BSD but it is just fine as a base. Linux has driven a lot of development in other area and I'd venture to say INCLUDING OS X, by showing an alternative can gain a foothold.
I do not blindly support every MS move, linux move, bsd move, etc, and I do not blindly say every apple move is wrong (I said one of their best moves was stopping mac clones to have quality hardware just a bit ago) As for Linux, it was great to help the cause of Unix. My biggest beef is the lack of consistency from version to version. The fact that you have to make sure that the libc on your system was built when the full moon was hovering over Timbuktu is insane. The dependency management in Linux is horrid. Linux is a great alternative to Windows for someone who doesn't wants to spend money on an OS. But, in the end, you get what you pay for. |
Attempt #2 on the JFK-ONT run today. The IFL is quiet and apparently there are ATC delays in SFO. This should be fun!
|
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11678660)
The issue that I have is that you go to lengths to defend MS but rarely admit it's faults. Furthermore, you are a minority in the general population as to how reliable Windows is. Quite frankly, you are the first person I have run into which says Windows is so great. Even most of the Windows admins I know that it has issues. I am a very experienced windows admin, I have met few that know anything about windows even those that are MCSE certified, they hand those out like candy canes at christmastime. That is a major problem with MS, and increasingly with RedHat, certifications are worthless. I have seen so many screwed up AD installs, insecure to the max, it is no wonder Windows has a bad name with the inept people that call themselves admins. I've seen the same on linux now, and all the 'control panels' and 'wizards' for linux it is getting worse there by the day. OS X and FreeBSD will see their day in the inept admin spotlight in the coming years, without a doubt. There will however still be groups of people that really know what they are doing and be able to run it properly. I know quite a few people employed as 'unix admins' and I have more unix experience than them, from NCR systems running SysV, to minix on an old 386 of mine, to debian before it was hot with ubuntu, and freebsd varieties, picobsd spinoff on small machines, netbsd running some incredible transparent firewall systems, and more. So it all boils down to: personal experience can vary for all, but not all admins are worth their salt, pepper hash or fortune cookie. |
Screw 90 degrees in the PClub. The tech arguing is reaching a boil.
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 11678756)
Screw 90 degrees in the PClub. The tech arguing is reaching a boil.
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 11678756)
Screw 90 degrees in the PClub. The tech arguing is reaching a boil.
:D:o;):rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by AMF in NJ
(Post 11678791)
Don't worry, after 5:00 EDT you have the politics talk. :rolleyes:
:D:o;):rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Plus1
(Post 11678620)
It's about 90 degrees in the P-Club in EWR. Yikes.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:20 am. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.