Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Upgrade still waitlisted even though R (now PZ) class is available {Archive}

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Upgrade still waitlisted even though R (now PZ) class is available {Archive}

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2014, 11:16 am
  #646  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH
Seems to me most people who know about this issue and watch for R like a hawk might be getting upgrades that they might not have gotten. Just because R is available, it doesn't necessarily mean your upgrade should have been processed - someone else's might have been next. The only ones that are battling for the upgrade between release of R and the list run are the few that know about the issue, who are probably FTers (and the odd current booker).

Yes and no. Some of us have lives, jobs, other commitments, etc. We can't be watching our ressies like a hawk all of the time. At a minimum, we all need to sleep.

And even if we spot it, sometime we're not in a position to do anything about it (e.g., in a meeting, at an event, etc.), and can't reasonably make a phone call.

Sure, it's a good thing when you can make it work. But when you don't have the time to babysit, you can lose out.
channa is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2014, 11:40 am
  #647  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,055
Originally Posted by BayAreaResident
If you need R space for both complimentary and certificate upgrades to clear, and you can call in to jump the wait list whenever R space opens up, is there any advantage to using certificates?
I'm pretty sure R availability doesn't necessarily equate to CPU availability.
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2014, 11:48 am
  #648  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,675
Originally Posted by BayAreaResident
If you need R space for both complimentary and certificate upgrades to clear, and you can call in to jump the wait list whenever R space opens up, is there any advantage to using certificates?

Agents are not supposed to clear CPUs into open R space. CPUs do automatically clear into R, but the availability of R does not necessarily mean that CPU is running abnormally (at least that is what we believe at this point given the available information). However, waitlisted instruments should automatically clear when R>0. That is what this thread is about.


Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH
Seems to me most people who know about this issue and watch for R like a hawk might be getting upgrades that they might not have gotten. Just because R is available, it doesn't necessarily mean your upgrade should have been processed - someone else's might have been next. The only ones that are battling for the upgrade between release of R and the list run are the few that know about the issue, who are probably FTers (and the odd current booker).
Most of us, I'm sure you included, would rather have a system that can be trusted to work correctly than a system that allows rampant queue-jumping by those who happen to find R open and have the ability to act immediately on it, regardless of the population size who knows about and/or is able to act on the current loophole.

This is why I like the AS system. The visibility is there for the upgrade bucket like on UA, but the system works as advertised. I never worry about whether or not my upgrade will process correctly, because I don't have any evidence that I or anyone else I know have been screwed in the past. Right now UA is saying that waitlisted upgrades clear into open R automatically, but the abundance of evidence suggests this is patently false. I'd be 110% supportive of UA continuing to show R, but making their system work as advertised, even if my GPU/RPU clearance rate goes down by not being able to force waitlisted upgrades into open R space.
PV_Premier is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2014, 12:01 pm
  #649  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,055
Originally Posted by PV_Premier
Most of us, I'm sure you included, would rather have a system that can be trusted to work correctly than a system that allows rampant queue-jumping by those who happen to find R open and have the ability to act immediately on it, regardless of the population size who knows about and/or is able to act on the current loophole...
I agree, but knowing about the system flaw and how to (depending on your viewpoint) play or compensate for it is better than not knowing about it. Those at a disadvantage are those who don't know about it. Fixing the system will probably result in fewer upgrades for those who play/compensate for it. Those people would probably not want the flaw to be fixed if they knew they were receiving more upgrades than they should.

Plenty of posts in this forum of people happy they called in when they saw R available and got agent to clear them into it. Those same people might be have sat in coach had the system flaw not existed. I wonder how many of those would (honestly) admit that they'd have rather sat in coach and let the people they bypassed sit in front.

The best/fairest answer is fix the system and let the chips fall as they should.

Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Oct 18, 2014 at 12:17 pm
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 2:36 pm
  #650  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYS
Programs: UA 1K MM, IHG Plat Amb, HH Diamond
Posts: 311
Cleared a GPU on 117 EWR-HKG

I bought a one way ticket JFK-HKG via SFO around Sep 12th for travel this Monday in W class. I placed myself on the wait list at time of purchase. At that time the seat map had only about 15 of 52 seats occupied.
As time went by, seats filled up as one would expect. About 2 weeks ago there were still 19 seats showing as empty and the bucket was still showing J9 Z9 and P5. I was still hopeful! Last week, over a weekend, both flights sold out in J. As a precaution i booked a reward seat on the CX non-stop from ORD as that was the only reward seat I could find.
Yesterday I called a UA agent to ask what they thought my chances were. I asked if he thought it would help if I switched to the non-stop, paying the change fee, as that one was still showing J9. He was very helpful even going as far as checking the wait list totals. (Is that even possible?) He said that there were more people, 1K's, on the list than available seats. I told him thank you and hung up.
Today in the morning I check again and there is RN1! I call up the agent and pay the fee and upgrade. I even then cancelled my reward return ticket, turning it into a round trip and cleared into R using miles and a co-pay.
What happened to the large wait list???
eyuro is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 2:38 pm
  #651  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,629
Originally Posted by eyuro
What happened to the large wait list???
You jumped it.

Upgrade Still Waitlisted Even Though R Class Available
Kacee is online now  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 6:28 pm
  #652  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYS
Programs: UA 1K MM, IHG Plat Amb, HH Diamond
Posts: 311
Originally Posted by Kacee
I understand jumping when I was wait listed for the flight I jumped. I also am aware that within 24 hours of flight time there appears an R1 in the bucket, and I've grabbed that before. Here we are +5 days out, and by the UA phone agents own admission there have to be countless people including 1K's on the list, why offer R seats? Why wouldn't they clear the first guy on the list? Am I supposed to feel bad doing this?
eyuro is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 6:34 pm
  #653  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NorCal - 1K 2MM
Posts: 2,089
Originally Posted by eyuro
Why wouldn't they clear the first guy on the list?
Because they don't have the IT ability to do this automatically when R space opens, but instead must wait for some mysterious, 20th century process to run its course in due time.
Starman is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 6:39 pm
  #654  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,629
Originally Posted by eyuro
I understand jumping when I was wait listed for the flight I jumped. I also am aware that within 24 hours of flight time there appears an R1 in the bucket, and I've grabbed that before.
Why do you think the answer is any different at T-5 days vs. T-24 hours?
Kacee is online now  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 8:48 am
  #655  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,675
Used this to my coworkers advantage this morning. He was confirmed in BF in advance but due to a visa issue had to change and rebook his flight. Lost the upgrade. This morning on his reissued ticket R1 with at least 5 revenue pax on the list. I notified him of the R1, and he called in and got the seat (no status, miles and $$ upgrade).
PV_Premier is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 9:45 am
  #656  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: UA1k; Bonvoy Titanium; Hilton Gold; IHG Gold; AA Plat Pro
Posts: 1,795
It is amazing that UA is still persisting with this broken system so long after the merger. I must say I have benefited from it too but do not know how many time I have lost. I would much rather have a fair system.
1k650 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 9:58 am
  #657  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NorCal - 1K 2MM
Posts: 2,089
Originally Posted by 1k650
It is amazing that UA is still persisting with this broken system so long after the merger. I must say I have benefited from it too but do not know how many time I have lost. I would much rather have a fair system.
Others can (and undoubtedly will!) correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it was a conscious, affirmative decision on CO's part to stick with CO software systems when they took over UA. So it's not an issue of "integrating things after the merger" -- this is the way CO decided that the new airline was going to be.
Starman is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 10:30 am
  #658  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by Starman
Others can (and undoubtedly will!) correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it was a conscious, affirmative decision on CO's part to stick with CO software systems when they took over UA. So it's not an issue of "integrating things after the merger" -- this is the way CO decided that the new airline was going to be.

Yes, and these bugs have plagued CO for well over a decade, and CO never did anything about them. I don't know why people think that something that's been going on with CO since the 1990's is going to all of a sudden be fixed because the name changed to "United."
channa is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 10:39 am
  #659  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,629
Originally Posted by channa
Yes, and these bugs have plagued CO for well over a decade, and CO never did anything about them. I don't know why people think that something that's been going on with CO since the 1990's is going to all of a sudden be fixed because the name changed to "United."
Well they have "fixed" some stuff, like queue jumping on ps. Of course the solution was just to just stop opening R . . . .
Kacee is online now  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 5:54 pm
  #660  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,277
My flight Sunday morning cleared this a.m. without R ever opening up. It had 2 F seats and I had an EF alert for P which never notified ... when I checked the reservation I saw the RPU cleared and I was in F with F down to 1 ... only one listed on the UG list .
Hope this is yet another sign they are fixing the broken system.
cfischer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.