Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA Orders Boeing 777-300ERs / 77Ws w/ 1-2-1 Polaris Business, 3-4-3 Economy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Dec 9, 2016, 11:15 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: FlyHighInTheSky


https://www.united.com/web/en-US/content/travel/inflight/aircraft/777/300/default.aspx
Print Wikipost

UA Orders Boeing 777-300ERs / 77Ws w/ 1-2-1 Polaris Business, 3-4-3 Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2015, 5:40 pm
  #211  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morris County, NJ
Programs: UA 1K/*G, Avis Pres, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,305
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
The company has mentioned internally that they would like to move the sCO 757 away from Continental Europe within the next 18 - 24 months and isolate them to UK/Ireland flights where reliability isn't much of a concern or issue. Part of this involves reconfiguring the 3-cabin 763s to the 2-cabin 763 standard and taking more 787 deliveries. So expect 777s, 787s & 767s to Continental Europe and sCO 757s to UK/Ireland. Also look for more of the sCO 757s to fly more transcons such as EWR - LAX/SFO/SEA etc and West Coast/DEN - Hawaii flights. EWR - LHR will of course continue to see a mix of sCO 777s, 787s, 767s in addition to possibly a 757 or 2 during the summer travel season.
Those 757's are workhorses. Say what you want but I prefer the increased frequency vs. a 1-a-day wide body. Almost makes commuting to Europe easy.

Rainey's comments on how they'd like a replacement for the 757 makes me wonder if Boeing will finally announce the long-rumored 757ng or whatever you want to call it. Maybe call it a narrow body Dreamliner? With both UA and DL clamoring for it, why wouldn't Boeing build it?
dmurphynj is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 5:46 pm
  #212  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 1,032
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
Also look for more of the sCO 757s to fly more transcons such as EWR - LAX/SFO/SEA etc and West Coast/DEN - Hawaii flights.
If we are talking about INTL configuration, then yes please. If those are put on redeye flights, watch them become impossible upgrades (16F seats only).
radiowell is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 5:50 pm
  #213  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by dmurphynj
Those 757's are workhorses. Say what you want but I prefer the increased frequency vs. a 1-a-day wide body. Almost makes commuting to Europe easy.

Rainey's comments on how they'd like a replacement for the 757 makes me wonder if Boeing will finally announce the long-rumored 757ng or whatever you want to call it. Maybe call it a narrow body Dreamliner? With both UA and DL clamoring for it, why wouldn't Boeing build it?
Love working the 757 TATL in fact I would say 98% of the flights I bid/work are TATL 757s.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 5:50 pm
  #214  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by radiowell
If we are talking about INTL configuration, then yes please. If those are put on redeye flights, watch them become impossible upgrades (16F seats only).
The sCO 757s are only in one configuration 16J/153Y.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 5:59 pm
  #215  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
The company has mentioned internally that they would like to move the sCO 757 away from Continental Europe within the next 18 - 24 months and isolate them to UK/Ireland flights where reliability isn't much of a concern or issue. ...Also look for more of the sCO 757s to fly more transcons such as EWR - LAX/SFO/SEA etc and West Coast/DEN - Hawaii flights.
They mostly have to do this because of retiring the sUA 752s which previously had served those routes. The 73s can fill most of the same route profiles the 75s flew but these are examples of some which it doesn't work so well in.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 6:25 pm
  #216  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
Originally Posted by dmurphynj
Rainey's comments on how they'd like a replacement for the 757 makes me wonder if Boeing will finally announce the long-rumored 757ng or whatever you want to call it. Maybe call it a narrow body Dreamliner? With both UA and DL clamoring for it, why wouldn't Boeing build it?
Boeing doesn't have a platform for it, would have to be an all-new platform. Not worth it for a few hundred frames, would be an economic disaster like A380.

Also the lack of engines for it. Boeing would have to get one of the engine OEMs to blow billions on a new engine.
mduell is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 6:57 pm
  #217  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Orygun
Posts: 462
So, I think the above comments paint a very strong business case for the 777-300ER coming on board:

- RR 752 working more TCON and HI routes
- Refurbed 2 class 763s taking the place of the RR 752s ex EWR and IAD to to European continental destinations
- 787-8s and 787-9s filling the place of current IPTE 763s
- 777-300ERs taking the place of 744 long distance TPAC flying ex ORD
- 744s finally being fully retired as A350s & 787-10s come on line

Outstanding questions for UA:

- Can the A321Neo-LR really work in places like DEN and TATL?
- Do they wait for the Boeing NSA to replace the 752?
- When does UA order the 777X-8?
B787938 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 7:20 pm
  #218  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by B787938
So, I think the above comments paint a very strong business case for the 777-300ER coming on board:

- RR 752 working more TCON and HI routes
- Refurbed 2 class 763s taking the place of the RR 752s ex EWR and IAD to to European continental destinations
- 787-8s and 787-9s filling the place of current IPTE 763s
- 777-300ERs taking the place of 744 long distance TPAC flying ex ORD
- 744s finally being fully retired as A350s & 787-10s come on line

Outstanding questions for UA:

- Can the A321Neo-LR really work in places like DEN and TATL?
- Do they wait for the Boeing NSA to replace the 752?
- When does UA order the 777X-8?
With the imminent 77W order, they could choose to lease the 77W for a number of years and receive the 777-9X next decade. The 777-8X was only launched for the ME3. MAYBE Delta will order some of them in two decades or so to replace the 77L, as the 777-8X might be the only aircraft available to fly ATL-JNB and back nonstop. The 777-9X promises to be the most fuel efficient widebody Boeing has ever built. With the incredible success of the 77W, it has sold better than any single widebody model that Boeing has offered and it isn't even close, the 777-9X has a lot to live up to.
Longboater is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 7:35 pm
  #219  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
Originally Posted by B787938
Outstanding questions for UA:

- Can the A321Neo-LR really work in places like DEN and TATL?
- Do they wait for the Boeing NSA to replace the 752?
- When does UA order the 777X-8?
- Barely for TATL, much like the current 752 diversion-fest.
- That's a lot of years away, like 2030 EIS, maybe 2025 at the earliest.
- I doubt they will, they don't have any routes over 7000nm and I don't see ripe opportunities. 9X is where the smart money is. What is lucrative beyond these 7600nm SFO/EWR contours?


Last edited by mduell; Mar 3, 2015 at 7:42 pm
mduell is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 9:08 pm
  #220  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,161
UA To Order Boeing 777-300ERs?

All Airbus seats are 17" wide. Most Boeing seats only 16" with narrower aisles than Airbus. Airbus planes have roomier bathrooms etc. Fingers crossed for 3-class Airbus but fearing SMI/J's love affair with Boeing products will prevail. The Continental regime seems to favor 2-class (BusinessFirst and, is it EconomyBusiness...?)
AirbusFan2B is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 9:11 pm
  #221  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by AirbusFan2B
All Airbus seats are 17" wide. Most Boeing seats only 16" with narrower aisles than Airbus. Airbus planes have roomier bathrooms etc. Fingers crossed for 3-class Airbus but fearing SMI/J's love affair with Boeing products will prevail. The Continental regime seems to favor 2-class (BusinessFirst and, is it EconomyBusiness...?)
All internal workings point to no GF on the A350s. It's already not gonna be installed on any of the 787s (Both sCO and sUA ordered ones)
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 9:28 pm
  #222  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
All internal workings point to no GF on the A350s. It's already not gonna be installed on any of the 787s (Both sCO and sUA ordered ones)
Any hint of the 77W order? We can only speculate this order is all but imminent just finalising some final details. This management could care less about GF. The real question is whether if this order can be met in time for a 1-2-1 BF seating, which you have indicated on previous posts. And using info from GS flyers, it's pretty safe to say that the BF will resemble Qatar's new Business on the A350/787.
Longboater is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:47 pm
  #223  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,211
Originally Posted by AirbusFan2B
All Airbus seats are 17" wide. Most Boeing seats only 16" with narrower aisles than Airbus. Airbus planes have roomier bathrooms etc. Fingers crossed for 3-class Airbus but fearing SMI/J's love affair with Boeing products will prevail. The Continental regime seems to favor 2-class (BusinessFirst and, is it EconomyBusiness...?)
Totally incorrect - even the narrowbody seats are 17.1". Widebody seats are wider except for the 787 and 747
bocastephen is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:53 pm
  #224  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LAS ORD
Programs: AA Pro (mostly B6) OZ♦ (flying BR/UA), BA Silver Hyatt LT, Wynn Black, Cosmo Plat, Mlife Noir
Posts: 5,992
Originally Posted by AirbusFan2B
All Airbus seats are 17" wide. Most Boeing seats only 16" with narrower aisles than Airbus.
I thought the UA A319/A320 were a little under 18" and the 737 a little over 17".
gengar is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:56 pm
  #225  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,211
Originally Posted by gengar
I thought the UA A319/A320 were a little under 18" and the 737 a little over 17".
Unless the OP was referring to the 10x seats from hell on AC, EK, AA, etc...but everything on the UA fleet today is 17.1" or greater.

In fact, SQ 777-300ER new seats are well over 19" wide! Wider than the *cough* A380 seats on any carrier.
bocastephen is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.