![]() |
Originally Posted by Sarbanes
(Post 16874017)
You apparently don't realize I've gotten nothing of value from your software
Be serious, you have been a memeber here for a few years so should have been able to research how usefull the tool would be to "you". If it would be of no use then don't buy it, if it would be usefull then buy it and learn how it works. Seems to me like you couldn't get it to work "out of the box" (like so many other pieces of s/w now) and were not prepared to spend any time to learn what "you" were doing wrong. Hardly seems like KVS is the bad guy here. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by pmcg
(Post 16874271)
And who's problem is that exactly?
... Hardly seems like KVS is the bad guy here. :rolleyes: Or there's the, "Hey, let me take care of you" way - which they're not doing. I gave KVS a try on the recommendations here, the whole website is disorganized and I couldn't get it to work (again - their own listed method is broken), and I didn't want to waste hours with it. They wouldn't refund the purchase. And they're being rude jerks about it. It's shortsighed, too. How much is continuing to be negative over $15 going to lose them in new membership fees? I'll never try them again, even if they clean up their site and get better documentation. And I advise everyone else try a different tool - the expert flyer people seem more in touch with their customers, so perhaps try them first? |
Does the new interline agreement feature include interline checked bag agreements or is it just for interline ticketing.
|
Originally Posted by Sarbanes
(Post 16874599)
even though the documentation they've got on their own website didn't work.
Originally Posted by Sarbanes
(Post 16874599)
(again - their own listed method is broken)
However, everything was working correctly -- you were just [erroneously] trying to use a Method, which required a higher-tier membership (and which you did not even need to use anyway for the type of award search you were doing). The solution (which entailed simply switching to a different Method) was e-mailed back to you within 10 minutes of your original inquiry and we remain open to providing any further assistance (with substantive issues, relating to the KVS Tool) that you may require. |
Originally Posted by Moopere
(Post 16870120)
I have been getting weird, and pretty frustrating results from matrix.ita over the last couple of days. Its like some of the search criteria are causing lookup problems, but anyway, perhaps its just me doing strange things.
However, can anyone understand why the following would work: PER-NAN return Out 10 Oct 11 IN 18 OCT 11 Business class Using Sabre Fares/DotRes (and other methods) gives a fare basis D2F with QF. If I right click on this fare basis in KVS, and choose "find flights using this fare [ITA], specific date 10-18 OCT, the matrix.ita site returns a flight, and the search is successful. Yet, if I choose a month long search starting 10 OCT (1 week turnaround), the matrix.ita site returns that there are no flights. If I modify the search criteria at the Matrix site to cover 10-18 OCT it still returns no flights. I seem to have to use specific dates only, otherwise, no dice. Sounds like a matrix site error to me, but perhaps a kind reader of this post can enlighten me?
Originally Posted by Moopere
(Post 16870120)
The new site: http://matrix.itasoftware.com/ seems to be a lot more powerful in relation to searches.
Originally Posted by Moopere
(Post 16870120)
Any way I can use KVS to search for a fare basis with the new interface at matrix/ita?
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/5397/ita12.gif |
Originally Posted by KVS
(Post 16465482)
Glad you're finding this latest addition useful!
The Award Availability option has now been added. Please download an updated Beta (V6.2.9921.B2) and give it a try: [KVS Availability Tool 6.2.9921.B2/Diamond - ITA: Awards/AC-StarAlliance] Code:
LHR London Heathrow UK [EGLL]That message has been changed, as per the earlier post. Unfortunately, this would not be feasible, due to an equally tremendous increase in the number of queries and the amount of time those queries would take. For example, NYC (JFK/LGA/EWR) to LON (LHR/LGW/STN/LTN/LCY/QQS/QQW/ZLS/ZEP) would require 27 (3*9) separate queries. |
Originally Posted by FlyerGoldII
(Post 16876291)
I would like to have access to the KVS tool, with the feature of Star Alliance (through the AC method) award availability on alternate dates. However, I would prefer to have access to this feature, when this feature has passed the beta phase. When might this feature be part of the regular phase KVS tool?
|
Originally Posted by jasonvr
(Post 16876360)
*A/AC is now part of the mainline product and came out of Beta a couple of months ago
|
Originally Posted by FlyerGoldII
(Post 16876924)
If the feature of listing award availability on alternate dates is part of the Star Alliance/AC award mainline product, then how do I get access to this feature?
[KVS Availability Tool 6.4.0/Diamond - ITA: Awards/AC-StarAlliance/CA] Code:
YVR Vancouver Metro / Intl BC CA = YVR CXH [CYVR] |
Originally Posted by KVS
(Post 16871937)
We are sorry to learn of your disappointment.
Originally Posted by Sarbanes
(Post 16874017)
This is exactly what I'm talking about. This isn't helpful.
The patronizing tone and unhelpfulness of the representatives of your company is awful.
Originally Posted by Sarbanes
(Post 16874599)
Well, there's a couple different philosophies to business. There's the "tough ...., you bought it" way that they're going with - even though the documentation they've got on their own website didn't work.
Or there's the, "Hey, let me take care of you" way - which they're not doing. I gave KVS a try on the recommendations here, the whole website is disorganized and I couldn't get it to work (again - their own listed method is broken), and I didn't want to waste hours with it. They wouldn't refund the purchase. And they're being rude jerks about it. It's shortsighed, too. How much is continuing to be negative over $15 going to lose them in new membership fees? I'll never try them again, even if they clean up their site and get better documentation. And I advise everyone else try a different tool - the expert flyer people seem more in touch with their customers, so perhaps try them first?
Originally Posted by KVS
(Post 16875944)
Your concern would have certainly been justified, if that was the case.
Since you don't have a free trial, you are going to get people who don't like the product and want a refund after trying it out, that's part of doing business. If you don't want to worry about giving refunds, then give everyone a free trial. You can't have it both ways, unless you feel this payment lock-in the only way you can get people to pay for your product, it shouldn't be a problem to accommodate people one way or another. "I'm sorry you feel that way" is a rude blow off answer for someone you don't like, not for a customer. |
Originally Posted by njames879
(Post 16871200)
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I can't see the answer anywhere.
Originally Posted by njames879
(Post 16871200)
Can I define a route on the availability and fares tabs? For example, I need to fly LHR to Reno, and I want to go via Los Angeles. Can I "force" KVS to only return routes that go via LA?
[KVS Availability Tool 6.4.0/Diamond - Sabre: Availability/FS/US] Code:
LHR London Heathrow UK [EGLL] |
Originally Posted by KVS
(Post 16876100)
The engine behind the flexible search on ITA Matrix 1 cannot handle premium cabins.
Originally Posted by KVS
(Post 16876100)
You can copy-and-paste the ITA Query text, generated by the KVS Tool, into the From/To fields on ITA Matrix 2:
|
For the past few weeks, I can only do 1 Skyteam search. After that I get the following message:
Datasource Error [RW]: "Our reservation tool is currently unavailable. We are doing our best to restore the functionality as soon as possible" |
Originally Posted by Chaikel
(Post 16889295)
For the past few weeks, I can only do 1 Skyteam search. After that I get the following message:
It is getting very annoying to have to restart the program or launch another instance between every search. When will you be fixing this? Please use the US or UK POS options in the KVS Tool, both of which continue to function normally. |
Originally Posted by ual744777sta
(Post 16875423)
Does the new interline agreement feature include interline checked bag agreements or is it just for interline ticketing.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:44 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.