FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger-488/)
-   -   The Penalty Box (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger/710031-penalty-box.html)

Hartmann Jun 23, 2009 8:32 am


Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter (Post 11954530)
Apparently, GGG has a 10,000+ runway, and the 747/Space-Shuttle Combo has landed there. :confused:

However, the terminal is slightly larger than a typical suburban post-office. Go figure.

Beats AUS and their "international" south terminal, which, due to vivaAerobus leaving, is now closed.

Anglo Large Clawed Otter Jun 23, 2009 8:36 am


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 11954587)
A lot of the airports built in the south around that era were built with very long runways as diversion points/alternate landing sites for long rang bombers and whatnot for when the Ruskies nuked all our air force bases. That is also one of the reasons that something like one out of every five miles of interstate highway outside of metro areas is built straight and without any overpasses. Hello, my name is useless knowledge and I have a problem.

Teh Box needs its daily dose of obscure trivia. ^

sdm1130 Jun 23, 2009 8:36 am


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 11954587)
TPA-IAD-SAN-LAX-SFO-ONT-SFO-SAN-ORD-CLT-TPA was my routing. The two US segments were short and the CLT-TPA was on an A321 which is a decent plane. Sadly the ORD-CLT is on a 734. And, yes, you should take NK so you feel better about your US flights. :p I had to book my routing on Orbitz as TPA-SAN//SAN-ONT and reverse but it did work.

Now there are some nice FM lines. :)

As it is, I'm only going to be in FL for 5 days so I might need to make a separate trip down there if I decide to do this QUP. Time to price some things out and see if it will be worth keeping BD Gold next year...

sdm1130 Jun 23, 2009 8:38 am


Originally Posted by Hartmann (Post 11954592)
Beats AUS and their "international" south terminal, which, due to vivaAerobus leaving, is now closed.

Someone was really shooting for the stars when they decided AUS needed an International terminal..

ConciergeMike Jun 23, 2009 8:39 am

Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

I have been called the king of useless information, and I did know that little tidbit about the interstate system.

I've had caffeine...the fog is slowly starting to lift.

rolov Jun 23, 2009 8:39 am

Teh only problem with BD right now, is that some flights are not posting due to :rolleyes: in the new system.

Anglo Large Clawed Otter Jun 23, 2009 8:41 am


Originally Posted by rolov (Post 11954628)
Teh only problem with BD right now, is that some flights are not posting due to :rolleyes: in the new system.

Thankfully, my TG flights posted without issue.

Hartmann Jun 23, 2009 8:44 am


Originally Posted by sdm1130 (Post 11954621)
Someone was really shooting for the stars when they decided AUS needed an International terminal..

It would be cool if CO offered something like AA out of AUS, direct flights to some high yield destinations domestically. But yeah, international just seems a bit out of touch with reality.

ConciergeMike Jun 23, 2009 8:44 am

Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

Any FM line that you didn't previously have is a good one, IMO. Of course there should be style points for obscurity, but all new lines and dots are initially created equal.

ConciergeMike Jun 23, 2009 8:47 am

Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

CO might never run a focus city-style operation out of AUS, but they soon will have focus cities in IAD, LAX, SFO, and ORD. :p

sdm1130 Jun 23, 2009 8:48 am


Originally Posted by Hartmann (Post 11954648)
It would be cool if CO offered something like AA out of AUS, direct flights to some high yield destinations domestically. But yeah, international just seems a bit out of touch with reality.

AA recently announced that they are cutting a handful of their routes out of AUS - I'm not sure they will have many left over. AS is picking up a few of the AA routes and B6 already has similar routes out of AUS. I doubt CO wants to go head to head with AS or B6 even if it is in TX.

kingalien Jun 23, 2009 8:48 am

What is the world coming to when UA.com is running better than CO.com? :rolleyes:

rolov Jun 23, 2009 8:48 am


Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter (Post 11954637)
Thankfully, my TG flights posted without issue.

It seems to be mostly LH and LX that are being the most :rolleyes: and Hilton won't accept the new number.

icurhere2 Jun 23, 2009 8:49 am


Originally Posted by ConciergeMike (Post 11954667)
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

CO might never run a focus city-style operation out of AUS, but they soon will have focus cities in IAD, LAX, SFO, and ORD. :p

There's some serious :rolleyes: among those airports (sfogate excluded).

fozz Jun 23, 2009 8:54 am


Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter (Post 11954423)
IIRC, they changed the fare rules right around the time :rolleyes:v and I flew it in PS. They probably ran the numbers, and noticed that two passengers drank more $$$ in mojitos than they paid in total fare. :rolleyes:

I'm still laughing about the fact that, despite getting stranded at JFK due to irrops, UA refunded me about half of the total fare, even though I had already flown TPA-IAD-JFK-SFO-ONT-SFO-JFK.

I personally believe it was the GS agents at JFK that are responsible for killing it.

On my last run, I got all sorts of questions and they were visibly not happy. They thought I bought it by some fly-by-night means and when I told them I bought it on .bomb they were surprised but became a bit nicer.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:59 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.