Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Update: Aimia accepts Air Canada, TD, CIBC & Visa revised $450-million Aeroplan bid

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Aug 21, 2018, 8:23 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: yyznomad
For those of you interested only in the revised $450-million deal and related discussion, it starts on post 418:

https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan/1926409-update-aimia-accepts-air-canada-td-cibc-visa-revised-450-million-aeroplan-bid-28.html#post30109427
Print Wikipost

Update: Aimia accepts Air Canada, TD, CIBC & Visa revised $450-million Aeroplan bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2018, 8:53 pm
  #271  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
IT is beyond what's in the back end - I have literally zero knowledge when it comes to that so I wont say anything about that.
In terms of CX, which is something I do know quite in-depth... the AC website suites (Eup, Attitude, main site) is absolute dog dong. While flight pass app is okay, it's bogged down by a atrocious color scheme design.

There are very few mobile sites I would classify as literally unusable, and AC is right there on the top of list.

Also how much Cow flies is not really that relevant. Majority of AC's customer likely travel 2-4 times a year at best. Anytime you focus your site design on power users you eventually will get a problem on your hand.
Agree with you on the UX of most of the AC FFP UX it is really dated. Like hello 1997 called and Jean Chrétien wants his party's website back

Now that I think about it, one thing I realized that is missing from this discussion is to what extent AC retains customer data post 2020. If the answer is everything, it wouldn't be too hard for AC to continue using their IT backend/systems with Aeroplan customers using their existing member numbers in the new Altitude program. Close to 0 IT work would be required by AC in that respect. It's also unclear to me what aspects of the FFP IT is property of Aeroplan versus AC. If the "technology" that credits *A/Aeroplan/Altitude milage for AC flights taken is part of Aimia's IP then AC would be in a real bind, especially if they haven't developed their own separate technology.
skybluesea likes this.
FlyerTalker70 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 8:56 pm
  #272  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: Only J via Peasant Points, 777HDPeasant or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance and Narcissism.
Posts: 5,955
Originally Posted by j2simpso
Agree with you on the UX of most of the AC FFP UX it is really dated. Like hello 1997 called and Jean Chrétien wants his party's website back

Now that I think about it, one thing I realized that is missing from this discussion is to what extent AC retains customer data post 2020. If the answer is everything, it wouldn't be too hard for AC to continue using their IT backend/systems with Aeroplan customers using their existing member numbers in the new Altitude program. Close to 0 IT work would be required by AC in that respect. It's also unclear to me what aspects of the FFP IT is property of Aeroplan versus AC. If the "technology" that credits *A/Aeroplan/Altitude milage for AC flights taken is part of Aimia's IP then AC would be in a real bind, especially if they haven't developed their own separate technology.
I am willing to bet a round of beer with anyone that if AC doesnt buy AE. Esp if AE has ownership of aeroplan number and accounts. AC will likely employ a duplication process of some kind as they migrate to a new system of record. I think Royal Carribean did sth similar and it turned out to be a complete poop show for them. CEO has to publicly apologize to customers on forums. (And RCL is a company thats way ahead of curve when it comes to tech adoption comparing to AC).

Its reward program launch would be completely disaster during the first week of launch, in fact I bet most people would not even be able to login/register or book mileage tickets properly on day 1.
This is a company that wont even let you manage booking under your account when you have reward tickets we are talking about here. Launching a reward program in <2 years would be like going to the moon for them.

Last edited by Jumper Jack; Aug 2, 2018 at 9:12 pm
Jumper Jack is online now  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 9:13 pm
  #273  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Air Canada Super Elite 2+ Million Miles
Posts: 2,478
Better question - when does Calvin have for official retirement date, possibly pre Spring 2020 so can take massive pension and see you later suckers

why even offer for AP if some burning needs would NOT be filled, save political issues from AP failure and fall-out risk over what Ottawa might threaten to do as they did for AirMiles.

this story not ending anytime soon - better order more popcorn
skybluesea is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 9:23 pm
  #274  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto, Ont., Canada
Programs: Aeroplan; Marriott Platinum; IHG Platinum; Best Western Diamond
Posts: 2,165
AIM boldly breaks off talks with AC. AIM is giving AC the middle finger. AIM did announce ae 2.0, with mostly the same redemption point chart, and 20 airline partners. They have an existing working system. They are in talks with Oneworld. They must also contacted many other possible partners.
AIM should have a good quarterly report tomorrow. They feel the worst is over, and they have a parth forward.

AC was dirty/sleazy, and arrogant. Then they saw the ae 2.0 announced, and now is panicking they might lose business and database to others. They asked for a very short deadline to Aug. 2. Tomorrow AIM will show they actually have a strong hand, and people are doubting AC can have a working system come June 2020.

This should make an interesting business case do study. If ae does team up with OW and/or WJ, RBC, and existing point holders know they can still redeem, ae won't die. The table has been turned. AC needs to convince people they will have a functioning system come 2020. AC needs to convince people come 2020, customers won't need to start with 0 in their system (how they do that, is still a big unknown). It looks as if AC is the one to ante up more, rather than AIM accepting lower.
yscleo is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 9:27 pm
  #275  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YYC
Programs: AC 50k 1MM, Marriott LT Titanium Elite
Posts: 3,402
Originally Posted by j2simpso
Hey at least the Phoenix eventually rises from the ashes! I'm unsure if the same will be said about Aeroplan
Not in Australia it didn’t. They wrote it off and started fresh. I would bet that will happen here too.

Back to AE: AC should just pay the asking price and move on. They will save the difference in avoiding ill will (or depreciation of good will to be more accurate).
ridefar is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 9:49 pm
  #276  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YYC, Canada
Programs: AC 35k
Posts: 1,898
Well, they rejected the first offer...

Aimia rejects Air Canada’s unsolicited takeover bid after talks break off
YXUFlyboy is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 10:01 pm
  #277  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: YXE
Posts: 3,050
Can "OW" even really negotiate on behalf of its "members" these sorts of deals? The claim doesn't sound all that credible, given the very real limitations inherent to the airline "alliances" in terms of anti-trust limitations. A lot more credibility would be gained if they actually named a OW "member" that they were negotiating with, as opposed to the implied claim that they were negotiating collectively with an organization that may very well be prohibited from collective negotiation in such matters.

Is there any historic precedent for any other FFP program to change alliances without its traditional alliance sponsor/partner going along with?
eracerblue and roubaolic like this.
pitz is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 11:12 pm
  #278  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 336
A $2B points bonfire. Have fun everyone.
eracerblue is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 11:14 pm
  #279  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
I am willing to bet a round of beer with anyone that if AC doesnt buy AE. Esp if AE has ownership of aeroplan number and accounts. AC will likely employ a duplication process of some kind as they migrate to a new system of record. I think Royal Carribean did sth similar and it turned out to be a complete poop show for them. CEO has to publicly apologize to customers on forums. (And RCL is a company thats way ahead of curve when it comes to tech adoption comparing to AC).

Its reward program launch would be completely disaster during the first week of launch, in fact I bet most people would not even be able to login/register or book mileage tickets properly on day 1.
This is a company that wont even let you manage booking under your account when you have reward tickets we are talking about here. Launching a reward program in <2 years would be like going to the moon for them.
I can't comment on AC's backend but will say that I have yet to hear a success story in the travel industry of an IT over haul that worked out well. One could only look at the fiasco that was the SHARES integration when UA bought CO and BA's IT fiasco of 2016 to name but many such horror stories in the airline industry.

That being said, looking at the reviews for AC's mobile apps we can clearly see that AC has two teams. An A-Team that can build a solid mobile product with its Flight Pass app receiving 4.6/5 based on 281 reviews and it's B-Team that builds the main Air Canada app which receives 2.7/5 based on 886 reviews. Hopefully the Altitude team is getting the former rather than the latter

Safe Travels,

James
FlyerTalker70 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 12:02 am
  #280  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,922
Not unusual for an offer to be rejected and a new offer to be tendered at a later date.They are not that far apart;
AC and the 3 CC companies offered $325 million and the "assumption" of the debt obligation. Aimia wanted $450 million. That's chump change in a big deal. If AC increases the offer, I expect that the people holding AE miles will see a significant devaluation to cover that increased cost.
It is also not unlikely to have an alternative purchaser treat this as an asset sale only and provide a better price than AC and then let Amia declare insolvency, flushing all the members miles. Look at what happened to the FFs of Air Berlin.
I really do expect that people are going to get screwed over.

Originally Posted by pitz
Can "OW" even really negotiate on behalf of its "members" these sorts of deals? The claim doesn't sound all that credible, given the very real limitations inherent to the airline "alliances" in terms of anti-trust limitations. A lot more credibility would be gained if they actually named a OW "member" that they were negotiating with, as opposed to the implied claim that they were negotiating collectively with an organization that may very well be prohibited from collective negotiation in such matters.
Is there any historic precedent for any other FFP program to change alliances without its traditional alliance sponsor/partner going along with?
Nothing unusual in OW looking at this as it is in its mandate. The member airlines retain the right to change/manage their frequent flyer programme rules, regulations, travel awards and special offers in accordance with their respective program rules. OW is negotiating the purchase of IP., an asset, on behalf of its members.

The more I look at this, the more I think I am about to get screwed over and to lose miles that I have been unable to redeem on Aeroplan.. (I fly business and want to redeem in business.)

If the government doesn't get involved before this blows up, then this, combined with the talk of the new inheritance taxes, is going to be one nasty political maelstrom next year.
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 1:18 am
  #281  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: YXE
Posts: 3,050
Originally Posted by Transpacificflyer
Nothing unusual in OW looking at this as it is in its mandate. The member airlines retain the right to change/manage their frequent flyer programme rules, regulations, travel awards and special offers in accordance with their respective program rules. OW is negotiating the purchase of IP., an asset, on behalf of its members.
I was thinking along the lines of anti-trust considerations. Members of airline alliances that receive anti-trust immunity only receive it on a very limited basis for a limited range of activities, ie: jointly marketing services, etc. Its not clear to me whether the conspiracy of "OW" would even be allowed to make a collective bid for AP assets or engage in collective negotiation, that otherwise would be the purview of individuals. They certainly aren't allowed to conspire to make joint bids for aircraft procurement, aircraft maintenance, for which the conspiracy of the competitors may drive pricing in their favour. One of the substantial reasons why conspiracy in restraint of trade was prohibited.

So absent any sort of confirmation from "OW" that they (whatever "OW" actually is as an organization), or any of their partners in conspiracy have actually talked to AP, I would take AP's claim with a grain of salt.
pitz is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 2:36 am
  #282  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,804
Originally Posted by j2simpso

That being said, looking at the reviews for AC's mobile apps we can clearly see that AC has two teams. An A-Team that can build a solid mobile product with its Flight Pass app receiving 4.6/5 based on 281 reviews and it's B-Team that builds the main Air Canada app which receives 2.7/5 based on 886 reviews. Hopefully the Altitude team is getting the former rather than the latter
It appears team A is i-house, while B is IBM. Whose junk has to sit on top of all the old RES-III stuff.

The real test case will be the planned transition to Amadeus though. The new FF program is small potatoes in comparison. May well be also that Amadeus (love of god) has roughly what they need.
Stranger is online now  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 4:30 am
  #283  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mississauga Ontario
Posts: 4,105
Originally Posted by j2simpso
I can't comment on AC's backend but will say that I have yet to hear a success story in the travel industry of an IT over haul that worked out well. One could only look at the fiasco that was the SHARES integration when UA bought CO and BA's IT fiasco of 2016 to name but many such horror stories in the airline industry.

That being said, looking at the reviews for AC's mobile apps we can clearly see that AC has two teams. An A-Team that can build a solid mobile product with its Flight Pass app receiving 4.6/5 based on 281 reviews and it's B-Team that builds the main Air Canada app which receives 2.7/5 based on 886 reviews. Hopefully the Altitude team is getting the former rather than the latter

Safe Travels,

James
Agreed with that. The Mobile app is solid, the interface is great, its reliable (well, at least when the back end doesn't go to crap), and works. The other? Dog's breakfast.
InTheAirGuy is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 6:11 am
  #284  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,068
From TD this am


"We're writing today to share additional information about the Aeroplan Program and TD Aeroplan credit cards.

In May 2017, Air Canada announced that effective June 30, 2020, Aeroplan would no longer be the loyalty program for Air Canada. Aimia owns and operates the Aeroplan Program.

Since that time, TD has had ongoing discussions with Aimia. TD has paid and continues to pay for the Aeroplan miles that our customers accumulate, and Aimia has the obligation to turn your miles into rewards. We have sought, but not received, assurances from Aimia that the Aeroplan Program will deliver the value that we and you, as a TD Aeroplan credit cardholder, would expect from Aimia in the long term.

TD recently participated in a proposal by Air Canada, TD and other interested parties to buy the Aeroplan Program. After engaging in extensive discussions with Aimia, the proposal, enhanced from the original offer, would have provided the best outcome for all Aeroplan members. TD believed that the proposed transaction, if completed, would have provided value and continuity to TD Aeroplan credit cardholders. We're disappointed Aimia rejected this proposal and we're now evaluating next steps.

We appreciate you're likely looking for greater clarity around this situation. We will keep you informed of any developments in order to provide you with the customer experience you expect as a TD credit cardholder. In the meantime you can continue to use your TD Aeroplan credit card. If you have questions about your Aeroplan membership or the Aeroplan Program, please contact Aimia at 1‑800‑361‑5373 or visit www.aeroplan.com.

Here's a link to Q&As for additional information. If you have additional questions about your TD Aeroplan credit card, please call us at 1‑800‑983‑8472.

Sincerely,

Frank Psoras
Senior Vice President, Canadian Credit Cards "
roubaolic likes this.
acysb87 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 6:32 am
  #285  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Programs: AC, UA, IHG, SPG, Carlson
Posts: 193
Interesting...
roubaolic is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.