Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UAL 2Q 2014 Results/Discussion/News → Results Announced July 24th, 2014 ←

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2014, 7:33 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: mkr
UAL

earnings released: Thursday, July 24,2014 9:30 am CST/10:30 EST

If you missed the live webcast of the 2nd Q earnings conference call, it is now available for replay for a limited time and will later be archived.
A transcript is now available also.
Click this link for access to replay and transcript of call:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23227909-post151.html

Current 2Q 2014 UAL guidance (4/24/14 investor update):

PRASM +1-3%
ASM "quarter, flat to +1%, full year +.5 to 1.5%"
CASM ex fuel, "quarter +1.25 to 2.25%, full year +1-2%"
Analyst guidance/actual 2Q 2013 results:

6/5/14 estimates:
1.86/share (using the 367M shares from last release $682M profit ex special items) [2q 2013 actual was $521M; $1.35/share ex specials; $469M GAAP]
Revenue 10.33B (3.3% growth) [2q 2013 was $10B]

Actual results:
- $789m GAAP Net income, $2.34/share. 7.6% margin
- $919m Net Income (excluding specials) or $1.04 per share. 8.9% margin
- $906m Operating Income (8.8% margin)
- $1.08B Operating Income excluding specials (10.4% margin)

- PRASM up 3.7%, yield up 3.0%; domestic yield +6.8%
- ASM -0.1%
- CASM-Ex fuel, profit sharing and special items down 0.2%
- Operating Revenue: $10.33B (up 3.3%); Passenger Revenue $8.98B( up3.6%)
- $1.5B in operating cash flow


Links to UA Press Releases / News Articles / etc.:

DAL
earnings released: Wednesday July 23 at 10 edt. Call link: https://event.on24.com/eventRegistra...epage=register

Actual results:

- $801m GAAP Net income, $0.94/diluted share. 7.5% margin
- $889m Net Income (excluding specials) or $1.04 per share. 8.4% margin
Delta's pre-tax income, ex special items was $1.4 billion.
- $1.58B Operating Income (14.9% margin)
- $1.61B Operating Income excluding specials (15.1% margin)

- PRASM up 5.7%, yield up 3.8%; domestic yield +7.4%
- ASM +3.2%
- CASM-Ex fuel, profit sharing and special items was FLAT
- Operating Revenue: $10.62B (up 9%); Passenger Revenue $9.27B ( up9%)
- Over $2.0B in operating cash flow and $1.5B in free cash, net debt $7.9B

3Q projections
: Operating margin +15 to +17%, CASM +0 to 2%, "unit revenues" (I take to be PRASM - spin) +2-4% "driven by continued corporate and domestic strength, along with benefits from our revenue initiatives."

Links to DL Press Releases / News Articles / etc.:
http://news.delta.com/2014-07-23-Del...Quarter-Profit

AAL - earnings call: July 24, 2014 at 12:30 cdt
link to call: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....estorrelations

Estimates/AAL guidance:

2Q PRASM +5-7% (updated estimate from 6/9/14 traffic release). YTD ASM +2.5%.

Actual results:

- $864m GAAP Net income
- $1.5B Net Income (excluding specials)
- $11.4B Revenue (+10.2%)

- Yeld +6.5% (17.34)
- PRASM up 5.9%, (14.57)
- ASM +3.1%
- CASM +3.9% (13.61)
Print Wikipost

UAL 2Q 2014 Results/Discussion/News → Results Announced July 24th, 2014 ←

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:05 am
  #256  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 2,284
Originally Posted by fastair
unless I missed it, Jamie Baker didn't ask anything.
Jamie Baker asked about UA's ability to control capacity with their JV partners.
AeroWesty is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:07 am
  #257  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Diego
Programs: Star, Oneworld, Skymiles, SPG
Posts: 243
Originally Posted by halls120
That's too bad. While I'm happy UA made money instead of losing money, Smisek is still a huge problem. He and his minions aren't real leaders, and they aren't doing anything to address UA's significant operational issues and labor problems.
Making money is not as significant as it seems because airlines are highly-cyclical. The pretty much always make more money in the 2nd and 3rd quarter than in the 1st and 4th. Especially on international.

I managed to snag two very good fares in August: SAN-HNL RT for $440 and SAN-LHR RT for $997. While these fares are good for me, they are not good for UA. I expect by labor day to have 38,000 PQM and barely $2,500 PQD including $160 for E+ seats. Averages out to 6.5 cents per mile. UA is not making any money on my tickets.
eghansen is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:13 am
  #258  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Programs: Onepass
Posts: 217
It was in reference to going to the used market for additional narrowbody mainline aircraft. They, Compton?, mentioned that while the new aircraft producers are coming out with are marvels, they're trying to grow while controlling CAPEX. I think the reference was towards the new C Series and other similar aircraft.

They referenced used 738s and A320s, specifically that 738s are more expensive than similarly aged A320s. Not sure if by A320s they were also including A319s. Since they've increased the capacity on the Airbuses with the slimlines their CASM has improved. Might be an opportunity to grab some Airbuses from operators who are upgrading to the NEOs.
STT757 is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:19 am
  #259  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
Originally Posted by eghansen
I managed to snag two very good fares in August: SAN-HNL RT for $440 and SAN-LHR RT for $997. While these fares are good for me, they are not good for UA. I expect by labor day to have 38,000 PQM and barely $2,500 PQD including $160 for E+ seats. Averages out to 6.5 cents per mile. UA is not making any money on my tickets.
Until UA runs 100% loads (not possible of course), fares like yours still help to cover the costs.

Again - if UA doesn't want to offer those fares, they don't have to! So you snagging them doesn't make you a "bad customer".
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:20 am
  #260  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
Originally Posted by AeroWesty
Jamie Baker asked about UA's ability to control capacity with their JV partners.
Thnx. I heard the end if the reply to that, but was reloading when the question was asked. A good question, but short if the usual zinger.
fastair is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:23 am
  #261  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,454
Originally Posted by entropy
They could likely put in orders for E190/195, the 190 holds 94, and the 195 106 in 2 class standard config. They would probably have to operate those as mainline.

I don't really know what sort of used aircraft would become available in the seating range they seem to need more. The 318/736 come to mind but they are very high CASM aircraft.
There was a rumor as recently as last week that UA was looking at as many as 35-40 A319s from a Chinese operator, but it appears that deal is dead.

The A320 is probably United's preferred machine, as the 319 already has the highest CASM of the narrowbody fleet and the used 321 market is almost nonexistent.

The 737-600 or A318 are non-starters.

Originally Posted by channa
I don't think they're trying to address a ~100-seater capacity gap as much as they are trying to get more planes, period.

They alluded to used 738s and Airbuses, and mentioned that a used Airbus is cheaper than a used 738. That's probably more along the lines of what they're thinking.
Exactly. Right now, with LFs in the high 80s and strong PRASM performance in the domestic network, UA simply needs more frames. UA is standing behind their logic in replacing domestic 752s with 739ERs, and it's hard to argue with the bottom-line savings, but UA still needs a less capital-intensive solution to get more airplanes into the low end of the fleet.
EWR764 is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:24 am
  #262  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: DEN
Programs: Delta Silver. Former AA gold. UA MP and DL Plat AMEX cardholder
Posts: 1,254
Originally Posted by STT757
It was in reference to going to the used market for additional narrowbody mainline aircraft. They, Compton?, mentioned that while the new aircraft producers are coming out with are marvels, they're trying to grow while controlling CAPEX. I think the reference was towards the new C Series and other similar aircraft.

They referenced used 738s and A320s, specifically that 738s are more expensive than similarly aged A320s. Not sure if by A320s they were also including A319s. Since they've increased the capacity on the Airbuses with the slimlines their CASM has improved. Might be an opportunity to grab some Airbuses from operators who are upgrading to the NEOs.
The logic for buying used aircraft seems backwards for UA and ordering new planes.

Why wouldn't they pull 757s out of the desert if they need more metal? Not to mention A320s are cheaper because they typically don't last as long as a 737 from a cycle perspective.

I don't buy it. I think they mentioned that piece for the investors to be happy. Same thing as saying they will be adding streaming entertainment "soon" with no end date.
REPUBLIC757 is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:25 am
  #263  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by EWR764
Exactly. Right now, with LFs in the high 80s and strong PRASM performance in the domestic network, UA simply needs more frames. UA is standing behind their logic in replacing domestic 752s with 739ERs, and it's hard to argue with the bottom-line savings, but UA still needs a less capital-intensive solution to get more airplanes into the low end of the fleet.
Well UA could defer the 757 retirements (again), but that wouldn't stick it to the UA FAs like Jeff wants to, so that may not be an option.
channa is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:26 am
  #264  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NY
Programs: AA Plat Pro, KrisFlyer Elite Gold
Posts: 578
I suppose these results make management think they're doing something right. ugh.
sriegert is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:29 am
  #265  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: DEN
Programs: Delta Silver. Former AA gold. UA MP and DL Plat AMEX cardholder
Posts: 1,254
Originally Posted by channa
Well UA could defer the 757 retirements (again), but that wouldn't stick it to the UA FAs like Jeff wants to, so that may not be an option.
As they should. They will have a problem come next year when the sCO 757s will be stretched thin and the 737s will be diverting on winter transcons.

UA pulling a DL and getting used aircraft goes against everything they stand for from an MX perspective. It would likely be much cheaper to take sUA 757 and modify them to their liking rather than buying 30-40 airbus from a 3rd world operator and refresh them. Talk about just sinking money into each frame just to get them up to speed.
REPUBLIC757 is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:32 am
  #266  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by REPUBLIC757
The logic for buying used aircraft seems backwards for UA and ordering new planes.

Why wouldn't they pull 757s out of the desert if they need more metal? Not to mention A320s are cheaper because they typically don't last as long as a 737 from a cycle perspective.

I don't buy it. I think they mentioned that piece for the investors to be happy. Same thing as saying they will be adding streaming entertainment "soon" with no end date.
The parked 757s are no longer viable from a practical or economic standpoint.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:37 am
  #267  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by REPUBLIC757
UA pulling a DL and getting used aircraft goes against everything they stand for from an MX perspective. It would likely be much cheaper to take sUA 757 and modify them to their liking rather than buying 30-40 airbus from a 3rd world operator and refresh them. Talk about just sinking money into each frame just to get them up to speed.
While it's not a typical CO fleet strategy, they have done it before (e.g., the ATA 753s).

That said, it now a proven strategy based on DL's results -- they have been buying both used MD-90s and the AirTran 717s, in conjunction with their new equipment.

Just like buying a car, there's a benefit to not having as large a cash outlay (or a payment).

It's also much faster than ordering new aircraft if they don't want to miss this economic cycle.

One of the benefits of having a mixed Airbus/Boeing narrowbody fleet, they can be open to either type of aircraft without impacting their ops too much. Which also flies in the face of traditional CO thinking.

Maybe they're growing up.
channa is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:37 am
  #268  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DCA
Programs: UA LT 1K, AA EXP, Bonvoy LT Titan, Avis PC, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,658
How much did UA get from selling several gates at LAX to AA?
cova is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:39 am
  #269  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAX
Programs: UA MM | BA Silver
Posts: 7,193
Originally Posted by REPUBLIC757
The logic for buying used aircraft seems backwards for UA and ordering new planes.

Why wouldn't they pull 757s out of the desert if they need more metal? Not to mention A320s are cheaper because they typically don't last as long as a 737 from a cycle perspective.
My understanding is that the retired 757's are not sitting in the desert and have already been sold. If this is the case, UNITED doesn't have extra capacity sitting around waiting to be utilized. At least not the capacity currently being sourced.

Also, I can't tell from the thread, is UNITED talking about buying or leasing used AC?
anc-ord772 is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2014, 11:40 am
  #270  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: DEN
Programs: Delta Silver. Former AA gold. UA MP and DL Plat AMEX cardholder
Posts: 1,254
Originally Posted by fly18725
The parked 757s are no longer viable from a practical or economic standpoint.
Somehow the sCO 757s and PS 757s are though?

IIRC, there are some (not many) 757 in the desert as well. 30 only went to fedex.
REPUBLIC757 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.