Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WN Asks Pax to Stop Recording BWI Ejection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2017, 9:04 am
  #271  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,512
Originally Posted by jeffandnicole
However, lying about your condition isn't opinion. That was fact.
That's speculation. But even if Anila Daulatzai had had paperwork, WN risked more off-loading the dogs by virtue of the ACAA.

You need emotional support to leave your house? Stay home.

You need your trained Neapolitan Mastiff to alert you (sometimes forcefully) when you're about to have a seizure? Tell the airline when you buy the ticket. Reasonable accommodations need to be made ahead of time.

By the time the animal gets to the plane, there is little a flight attendant can do or legally ask.

"It's getting to be ridiculous," Delta flight attendant Jen Williams said. "A co-worker saw a ferret wearing a diaper that was supposedly an emotional support animal."

She's seen dogs get loose and use the aisle as a lavatory. A co-worker told Williams a so-called service dog once bit a passenger and medics had to meet the flight when it landed.

"A lady on a flight was allergic, so we moved her away, but she broke out in hives," Williams said. "A nurse on the flight gave her Benadryl that we wouldn't have had if she didn't happen to be on the plane."
Fake Service Animals
joshua362 likes this.
LegalTender is online now  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 10:28 am
  #272  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SFO
Posts: 3,881
Originally Posted by LegalTender
It matters that they require no advance notice for boarding medical/emotional service animals. Insane. Half the following day's flights could have dogs and nothing in WNs system could inform burdened passengers.
Completely agree. What's the policy had the lady have the necessary certificate? Who gets offloaded? Rock papers scissors?
Troopers is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 10:29 am
  #273  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by Troopers
Completely agree. What's the policy had the lady have the necessary certificate? Who gets offloaded? Rock papers scissors?
IMHO the person who asks that others be removed should be removed.

Last edited by nsx; Oct 2, 2017 at 10:37 am
nsx is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 12:00 pm
  #274  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: New York
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott LTPP, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 1,079
Originally Posted by 1353513636
Wasn't Auvi-Q recalled?
Auvi-Q was recalled in 2015 over less than 30 reports of activation issues with zero deaths. Sanofi recalled it in full and reverted the rights back to the manufacturer, who then re-introduced it after making manufacturing changes.

EpiPen received a partial recall this year after Meridian (makes the drug for Pfizer) received hundreds of reports of administration issues, including cases in which patients died, and then performed inadequate investigation (knew that parts failed in cases where patients died but did not initiate a recall or compare to samples within the same lots to see if the defect had occurred in multiple devices, etc.)
phltraveler is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 12:35 pm
  #275  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 921
Originally Posted by LegalTender
That's speculation. But even if Anila Daulatzai had had paperwork, WN risked more off-loading the dogs by virtue of the ACAA.
Her actions speak volumes. It wasn't speculation.

You need emotional support to leave your house? Stay home.

You need your trained Neapolitan Mastiff to alert you (sometimes forcefully) when you're about to have a seizure? Tell the airline when you buy the ticket. Reasonable accommodations need to be made ahead of time.
Federal guidelines address this. And until you can force a change, you're in the wrong.
jeffandnicole is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 1:01 pm
  #276  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LAX/SMF/PDX/HNL
Programs: Hilton-lifetime diamond, Southwest A+, companion pass
Posts: 1,748
I noticed a new large sign outside our local Costco warning that no animals, other than bonafide service animals, were allowed inside.

This is a hopeful sign.
PTravel likes this.
dlaue is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 2:33 pm
  #277  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,512
Originally Posted by jeffandnicole
Her actions speak volumes. It wasn't speculation.
Yeah, it was. Inklings and hairs on the back of your neck don't count. The lady could have no allergies and some dog owner may have flashed her a middle salute. The storyline remains incomplete.

Had she produced paperwork, WN would have off-loaded the dogs? Fat chance.

Originally Posted by jeffandnicole
Federal guidelines address this. And until you can force a change, you're in the wrong.
Federal guidelines say nada about advance notice to an airline. Most insist on it to make sure contingencies are covered. SWA does not.
LegalTender is online now  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 7:13 pm
  #278  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,775
Originally Posted by Troopers
Completely agree. What's the policy had the lady have the necessary certificate? Who gets offloaded? Rock papers scissors?
Asked and answered multiple times in this thread. Please read!
Amicus likes this.
Kevin AA is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 7:15 pm
  #279  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,775
Originally Posted by dlaue
I noticed a new large sign outside our local Costco warning that no animals, other than bonafide service animals, were allowed inside.

This is a hopeful sign.
That's because a retail store is governed by the state whereas airplanes are governed by the federal government.

Colorado recently passed a law making it a crime to pass an ESA off as a "service dog" for the purpose of entering a public facility that bars animals (except service animals). ^
Kevin AA is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2017, 9:53 pm
  #280  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,323
Originally Posted by LegalTender
. . . .

You need emotional support to leave your house? Stay home.

]
Hmmm.
Amicus is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2017, 6:48 am
  #281  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 921
Originally Posted by dlaue
I noticed a new large sign outside our local Costco warning that no animals, other than bonafide service animals, were allowed inside.

This is a hopeful sign.
Take a look at the sticker on Lowes doors about animals. (Spoiler alert: Leashed pets are permitted!)

That's a hopeful sign! :-)
jeffandnicole is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2017, 9:33 am
  #282  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
I'm obviously way late to this party but I'm pretty much at the point where we should ban animals, except legitimate service animals, from the airlines.

I realize this is easier said than done - for one, it entails establishing a national accreditation for service animals and the schools that train them - but the whole "ESA" nonsense has really got to stop.

The types of pets found in passenger cabins can be transported in the cargo hold. During months when it's too hot to put an animal in the cargo hold, then our society may just have to do deal with the fact that we can't bring our pets with us when we travel on commercial airline flights.
pinniped is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2017, 12:30 pm
  #283  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,775
Originally Posted by pinniped
I'm obviously way late to this party but I'm pretty much at the point where we should ban animals, except legitimate service animals, from the airlines.

I realize this is easier said than done - for one, it entails establishing a national accreditation for service animals and the schools that train them - but the whole "ESA" nonsense has really got to stop.

The types of pets found in passenger cabins can be transported in the cargo hold. During months when it's too hot to put an animal in the cargo hold, then our society may just have to do deal with the fact that we can't bring our pets with us when we travel on commercial airline flights.
We should punish everyone because of one jerk?
Kevin AA is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2017, 3:58 pm
  #284  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LAX/SMF/PDX/HNL
Programs: Hilton-lifetime diamond, Southwest A+, companion pass
Posts: 1,748
Time to revisit this thread



http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/south...e-too-far.html
dlaue is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2017, 9:37 pm
  #285  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tokyo
Programs: SPG LT Plat ANA Plat
Posts: 596
Originally Posted by Renard
Exactly. The police should not be called in to enforce what was essentially a corporate policy. Calling in the police is starting to seem more and more like simply a lazy way to solve a sticky problem: “Not my problem. Call the cops.”

The call for cellphones away was very much an effort to cover up.

Airlines. If you call in the police to enforce your corporate policy and somebody is dragged off, expect it to be taped. Expect it to go viral. Expect bad press. If you don’t want this, don’t call in the police and it won’t be taped. Enforce your own policies in a manner similar to what is described above—don’t expect the police to do it and for the taxpayers to pay for it.
What exactly should they do when someone breaks the law in a way that is delaying many people and costing big money, all law enfornecent everywhere will say DONT take things into your own hands, call the police. SW did NOTHING wrong, should not apologise, seems police enforced the law with minimum forec required, and the woman should be banned from flying for life , simple
BRITINJAPAN3 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.