![]() |
Originally Posted by captaincool
(Post 36515963)
The card must be contactless to be able to load, but I always insert the chip
|
Originally Posted by soy
(Post 36509458)
Regular checkout can be a pain so I do not even try anymore. A lot of WM near me are now mostly self-checkout so there is always a long line at the manned checkout. Could spend 20min in line only for the cashier to say "go to MC"
1. Not all cashiers knew how to do it. Often they would call over a manager or someone more experienced (even if I told them option 70) 2. Sometimes they would ask how much I wanted to load and then say it was too much and go to MC 3. Sometimes they would say only at MC Unlike some of you my local Walmarts don't have an employee register at SC. So it became easier to just go to MC. No one there has actually given me any trouble, but I just load $250-$450 per visit, 1 swipe only, and alternate between the two closest Walmarts. I only really use this for when I get 10%+ in savings on GC so the velocity doesn't especially matter to me. |
I frequently load Serve first and then Discover. Serve load always goes well. Discover load is very cashier dependent. How is the load different? And how can I guide them better?
|
Originally Posted by superflyer99
(Post 36533169)
I frequently load Serve first and then Discover. Serve load always goes well. Discover load is very cashier dependent. How is the load different? And how can I guide them better?
|
Originally Posted by superflyer99
(Post 36533169)
I frequently load Serve first and then Discover. Serve load always goes well. Discover load is very cashier dependent. How is the load different? And how can I guide them better?
I believe that the action code the cashier punches in is the same. If you cannot load Discover when you can load a Serve card, then the issue to me is at the Discover level with the funding source, i.e. your GC. So, try my first line above. if not A but B okay, then it isn't WM. |
DP: WM is now monitoring Discover loads and flagging customer names.
|
Originally Posted by dwCoffee
(Post 36539958)
DP: WM is now monitoring Discover loads and flagging customer names.
|
Originally Posted by Prometheus77
(Post 36539972)
They have been doing that for awhile now. Discover called me and P2 months backs and specifically said WM had contacted them about loading velocity. The Discover agent whom I talked to during my financial review was super chill and nothing ever became of it. P2 also had no issues and it's been BAU ever since.
and, as for BAU - you went back to loading at WM without issue? The MC CSR was really cool and basically said "just slow it down a bit". I was doing P1/P2 1K loads back to back for a while, and of course thats 2x a week. |
I know this qn will be mostly a YMMV answer. Still wanted to ask.
Does any of you who have been doing this for long time run into WM being suddenly anal about it because of the volume and daily loads?. To their eyes it looks like structuring when it is the wally/discover/BB who put the daily and per transaction limit. I usually cool off when this comes up. Wondering if there is even a way to resolve / address it without making it worse. |
Originally Posted by NBG007
(Post 36542150)
I know this qn will be mostly a YMMV answer. Still wanted to ask.
Does any of you who have been doing this for long time run into WM being suddenly anal about it because of the volume and daily loads?. To their eyes it looks like structuring when it is the wally/discover/BB who put the daily and per transaction limit. I usually cool off when this comes up. Wondering if there is even a way to resolve / address it without making it worse. |
Just now went to load disco at WM and system tacked on a 3.74 fee.
Hoping the CSR screwed something up because it’s the end of disco if it’s legit |
Originally Posted by soy
(Post 36547167)
Just now went to load disco at WM and system tacked on a 3.74 fee.
Hoping the CSR screwed something up because it’s the end of disco if it’s legit |
Originally Posted by berombeu
(Post 36547182)
Must be CSR screwed up, just loaded 4 hours ago, BAU.
I did not complete the transaction once I saw the fee |
Staples 200 BHN Pathward VGC Bin 43588009 one full 200 swipe Fail
I will try Incom Sutton or Pathward next Try |
Originally Posted by pointnfly
(Post 36557178)
Staples 200 BHN Pathward VGC Bin 43588009 one full 200 swipe Fail
I will try Incom Sutton or Pathward next Try however I am recently having a lot of issues with SSVGC even seasoned. Not sure if it’s a wm issue but I’ll keep probing. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:10 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.