New First class retrofit thread
#226
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: So Cal
Programs: UA Gold/0.744MM, WN AL, Hyatt Diamond, MR Scum, Hertz PC, National Exec, Avis PC
Posts: 5,561
#227
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA, skymiles, AAdvantage, continental one pass, ANA, Hilton, SPG
Posts: 411
747 to lax
No answer needed... Just a comment. We're ending our Europe trip soon and I KNOW we won't get the new 747 from fra to lax but I'm totally cool with that. We even loved the den to fra experience in old style A346. Nice! So for all those worry warts lamenting about the retrofit... relax... it's still Lufthansa and not US Air and it's amazing.
#228
#229
No answer needed... Just a comment. We're ending our Europe trip soon and I KNOW we won't get the new 747 from fra to lax but I'm totally cool with that. We even loved the den to fra experience in old style A346. Nice! So for all those worry warts lamenting about the retrofit... relax... it's still Lufthansa and not US Air and it's amazing.
#230
Join Date: May 2012
Location: STR
Posts: 1
I like very much the 1st way . It is the best one because you keep your expectancies low and you can only win, while with 2 or 3 you may end up depressed with a last minute change, and not enjoy the F flight.
In any case, in the UD of a 744, with the double seat/bed and max 8 pax it can never be a bad experience.
In any case, in the UD of a 744, with the double seat/bed and max 8 pax it can never be a bad experience.
Remeber always: Do not panic!
#233
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bodø, Norway
Programs: SK*G/EBD, Le Club Accor Plat, Club Carlson Concierge, Hilton Gold
Posts: 537
A little bit off topic I know, but curiosity got the better of me:
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH, as I assume that LH puts the new product on their most important routes first?
Cheers
Stein
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH, as I assume that LH puts the new product on their most important routes first?
Cheers
Stein
Last edited by SASDC8; May 6, 2012 at 7:45 am Reason: Point
#234
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,516
A little bit off topic I know, but curiosity got the better of me:
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH?
Cheers
Stein
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH?
Cheers
Stein
#235
A little bit off topic I know, but curiosity got the better of me:
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH, as I assume that LH puts the new product on their most important routes first?
Cheers
Stein
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH, as I assume that LH puts the new product on their most important routes first?
Cheers
Stein
#236
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Malta
Programs: Skywards Silver
Posts: 550
A little bit off topic I know, but curiosity got the better of me:
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH, as I assume that LH puts the new product on their most important routes first?
Cheers
Stein
From post no. 1 is this thread, and checking registrations on flightradar24.com it seems that HKG almost never get a aircraft (744 from FRA and 346 from MUC) with new F.
Is HKG not a prioity destination for LH, as I assume that LH puts the new product on their most important routes first?
Cheers
Stein
There actually may be logic behind the lack of 74P deployment to HKG that most will never be able think of.
It is actually a safety related issue. The thing with flying to HKG is that the route taken crosses the Himalayas and due to the greatly increased minimum safe altitude (MSA), aircraft are required to have extra oxygen tanks fitted in order to supply supplemental oxygen for a prolonged period in the event of a decompression as pilots will not be able to dive down to at least FL140 where the air is dense enough for most passengers to breath without the help of emergency oxygen.
Therefore, those aircraft flying over such high terrain would need the addition of extra oxygen cylinders fitted and not all aircraft in the fleet have this installed and then to add that, the number that have both the extra cylinders as well as the new F is most probably less than the 10 retrofitted aircraft and lastly add in scheduling constraints and you'll see why HKG may not be getting new F 100% of the time.
#237
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bodø, Norway
Programs: SK*G/EBD, Le Club Accor Plat, Club Carlson Concierge, Hilton Gold
Posts: 537
I even thought HKG would be a 380 or 74H destination. Perhaps in due time
#238
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,516
There actually may be logic behind the lack of 74P deployment to HKG that most will never be able think of.
It is actually a safety related issue. The thing with flying to HKG is that the route taken crosses the Himalayas and due to the greatly increased minimum safe altitude (MSA), aircraft are required to have extra oxygen tanks fitted in order to supply supplemental oxygen for a prolonged period in the event of a decompression as pilots will not be able to dive down to at least FL140 where the air is dense enough for most passengers to breath without the help of emergency oxygen.
Therefore, those aircraft flying over such high terrain would need the addition of extra oxygen cylinders fitted and not all aircraft in the fleet have this installed and then to add that, the number that have both the extra cylinders as well as the new F is most probably less than the 10 retrofitted aircraft and lastly add in scheduling constraints and you'll see why HKG may not be getting new F 100% of the time.
It is actually a safety related issue. The thing with flying to HKG is that the route taken crosses the Himalayas and due to the greatly increased minimum safe altitude (MSA), aircraft are required to have extra oxygen tanks fitted in order to supply supplemental oxygen for a prolonged period in the event of a decompression as pilots will not be able to dive down to at least FL140 where the air is dense enough for most passengers to breath without the help of emergency oxygen.
Therefore, those aircraft flying over such high terrain would need the addition of extra oxygen cylinders fitted and not all aircraft in the fleet have this installed and then to add that, the number that have both the extra cylinders as well as the new F is most probably less than the 10 retrofitted aircraft and lastly add in scheduling constraints and you'll see why HKG may not be getting new F 100% of the time.
#239
There actually may be logic behind the lack of 74P deployment to HKG that most will never be able think of.
It is actually a safety related issue. The thing with flying to HKG is that the route taken crosses the Himalayas and due to the greatly increased minimum safe altitude (MSA), aircraft are required to have extra oxygen tanks fitted in order to supply supplemental oxygen for a prolonged period in the event of a decompression as pilots will not be able to dive down to at least FL140 where the air is dense enough for most passengers to breath without the help of emergency oxygen.
Therefore, those aircraft flying over such high terrain would need the addition of extra oxygen cylinders fitted and not all aircraft in the fleet have this installed and then to add that, the number that have both the extra cylinders as well as the new F is most probably less than the 10 retrofitted aircraft and lastly add in scheduling constraints and you'll see why HKG may not be getting new F 100% of the time.
It is actually a safety related issue. The thing with flying to HKG is that the route taken crosses the Himalayas and due to the greatly increased minimum safe altitude (MSA), aircraft are required to have extra oxygen tanks fitted in order to supply supplemental oxygen for a prolonged period in the event of a decompression as pilots will not be able to dive down to at least FL140 where the air is dense enough for most passengers to breath without the help of emergency oxygen.
Therefore, those aircraft flying over such high terrain would need the addition of extra oxygen cylinders fitted and not all aircraft in the fleet have this installed and then to add that, the number that have both the extra cylinders as well as the new F is most probably less than the 10 retrofitted aircraft and lastly add in scheduling constraints and you'll see why HKG may not be getting new F 100% of the time.
#240
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Malta
Programs: Skywards Silver
Posts: 550
No no, there is no retrofit programme for the extra O2 cylinders. They came with them installed from Boeing. What I mean is not the entire fleet have these extra cylinders as they are not needed on all routes and only a certain number of aircraft have them. So when you have a subfleet of x number of planes capable of flying over high terrain and add to that New F retrofitted too, then you have a number smaller than x.