FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger-488/)
-   -   The Penalty Box (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger/710031-penalty-box.html)

ConciergeMike Oct 8, 2008 2:32 pm

So AF at one point did fly LAX-LHR? Mommy the travel professional didn't believe me.

fozz Oct 8, 2008 2:40 pm

CM, sorry to hear the news.


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 10490180)
To compete with AF, perhaps?? Apparently AF is going to only fly JFK-LHR for a while instead of LAX-LHR. Supposedly only for the winter, but who knows.

It still befuddles me as to why AF continues to choose such over-saturated markets for their attempts at LHR service. I don't think the LAX-LHR service did too well, particularly with 2xBA, 2xVS, 1xUA, 1xAA and 1xNZ flight to compete against.

Plus, with DL giving up on their LAX mini-hub and having no feed traffic, even less traffic to connect into it.


Originally Posted by ConciergeMike (Post 10490311)
So AF at one point did fly LAX-LHR? Mommy the travel professional didn't believe me.

Yup, i think they are still flying it. Started right after Openskies.

sdm1130 Oct 8, 2008 2:43 pm


Originally Posted by fozz (Post 10490354)
Yup, i think they are still flying it. Started right after Openskies.

Correct. AF61 operated with a 772.

rolov Oct 8, 2008 2:59 pm


Originally Posted by fozz (Post 10490354)



Yup, i think they are still flying it. Started right after Openskies.

AF LAX-LHR is done after Nov 5th
every date after that show 0's in all classes

ConciergeMike Oct 8, 2008 3:02 pm


Originally Posted by fozz (Post 10490354)
It still befuddles me as to why AF continues to choose such over-saturated markets for their attempts at LHR service. I don't think the LAX-LHR service did too well, particularly with 2xBA, 2xVS, 1xUA, 1xAA and 1xNZ flight to compete against.

Since this route is being discussed, did anyone watch Dancing with the Stars (I watch for Julianne Hough, personally.....rar) when the show profiled Bruno and Len's travel schedule to go between the US and UK versions of the show? I would assume they were flying BA, but I didn't recognize the look of the sleeper seats.

ConciergeMike Oct 8, 2008 3:11 pm


Originally Posted by fozz (Post 10490354)
1xNZ flight to compete against.

I don't think (could be wrong, but) that the LAX-LHR segment can be booked by itself on NZ for US-originating pax. It's thru service from AKL, or least it looked that way on SABRE.

Anglo Large Clawed Otter Oct 8, 2008 3:17 pm


Originally Posted by ConciergeMike (Post 10490514)
I don't think (could be wrong, but) that the LAX-LHR segment can be booked by itself on NZ for US-originating pax. It's thru service from AKL, or least it looked that way on SABRE.

No. You can book LAX-LHR on NZ without issue.

belynch Oct 8, 2008 3:35 pm


Originally Posted by ConciergeMike (Post 10490514)
that the LAX-LHR segment can be booked by itself on NZ for US-originating pax.

I think you're confusing that with the LAX - JFK QF flights. NZ is bookable.

rolov Oct 8, 2008 3:43 pm


Originally Posted by belynch (Post 10490649)
I think you're confusing that with the LAX - JFK QF flights. NZ is bookable.

plus uno its def bookable

ConciergeMike Oct 8, 2008 3:43 pm

I duly stand corrected. I know nothing of West Coast travel-related anything except that I love SNA. I took a semi-educated guess because the SABRE display looked different than the rest.

ssullivan Oct 8, 2008 3:51 pm


Originally Posted by photog72 (Post 10490008)
The box is not the place to get help, we'll just encourage you (to jump off the Ben Franklin Bridge - ;) ). Isn't the ATL-PHL segment on an RJ? I thought US flew EMB 175s or 190s on this route. If 190, then ^. If not, then :td:. Though, US 175s aren't that bad, as I have experienced on the PHL-IAH route.

At least on the day I'm flying it, it's scheduled with a 319.

jrzyshawn Oct 8, 2008 4:36 pm


Originally Posted by radonc1 (Post 10489767)
I do not know about Deluxe, however I did try Fox Rent-A-Car once. This was in PHX. The biggest problem with them was that I waited over 1 hour for the pick-up van to come and get me. If I had known where their office was, I would have taken a cab. Furthermore, the little companies are pains because they make you get your fill up within 1 mile of the office and prove it, and have a ton of paperwork which takes forever to fill out. Finally if you ever break down, watch out.

I figured it was worth the extra $5-$10 to just go with a national company.

I wish it were just a $5-10 difference. It is more like $130.
I think I am going to give them a shot. I found a 15% off coupon if I show them my National loyalty card.

rkkwan Oct 8, 2008 6:51 pm

I used FOX at LAX last time and they're no worse than the big guys I've used here in terms of shuttle and lines. I've waited in long lines at Hertz and Avis as well.

They did "upgrade" me from an economy to a Jeep Commander. Horrible gas mileage, but I used that opportunity to get some furniture. And I have gotten "forced upgrade" at the big companies at various locations as well.

So, oversall, FOX here is no different from the other companies.

sbm12 Oct 8, 2008 7:24 pm


Originally Posted by ConciergeMike (Post 10490688)
I duly stand corrected. I know nothing of West Coast travel-related anything except that I love SNA. I took a semi-educated guess because the SABRE display looked different than the rest.

What's so great about SNA? I've got about 12 hours there in 4 weeks.

baglady Oct 8, 2008 7:46 pm

I was booking 3 tix IAH-TYS about a month out and the tix were over $500!!!!!:eek: CRAZY - and it was a U fare. Decided we'd fly into BNA and enjoy the scenic drive for over a $900 savings between the 3 tix :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:58 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.