:td::rolleyes::eek::mad::D:o@:-):-::p:-:

Haha. If all of us swore a no-multiquoting oath, Pandy would come after us for crashing teh servers.

Google voice set to screen calls and ^ play a recorded message.

only in person after the legal matters aside.

The only inaccuracies of the seatguru seatmap are the lack 16DEF and 17DEF and the listing of 18 (or 19) DEF as bulkhead, correct?

Yes, as best as I can see, but there have been three different threads in the past week - two of them today - about this topic. Annoying.

BF no longer has a row 1? @:-):-::rolleyes:

I don't understand seatguru. Many of their maps are inaccurate, and have been inaccurate for a long time. They do not seem to respond to users who report the inaccuracies and take forever to revise the seatmaps. It's as if someone logs in once a year, reads a few complaints, then makes a half-hearted attempt at fixing or updating the existing seat maps.

At least they have added many other airlines over the past year or so.

I missed that one. Wow, what a disaster of a seatmap.

It also looks like row 31 is missing.

And row 45.:rolleyes:

More is more. :-::-:

Not very Guru of them.

Whoops...I missed that.

They basically created the map by making a dummy reservation and trying to pick seats or by looking in a GDS as which seats are assigned/empty, ignoring the blocked seats which aren't shown. I don't know when they changed that image because it used to be perfectly accurate.

And I agree that they are ridiculously slow about fixing problems when reported. I've stopped bothering.

In this particular case SeatExpert is accurate, but it suffers many of the same problems as SeatGuru in terms of accuracy and update frequencies.

Yet they still list that there are 50 BF seats (and only show 44 of them). :rolleyes: I've tried to submit comments before and they always just seem to ignore them.