![]() |
|
Originally Posted by photog72
(Post 14042903)
People consider Wilmington a vacation destination?!:confused::rolleyes:
|
Anyone going to be at IAH later today? We have to go and pick up a friend of Mrs. photog72. She's flying in on CO 411 from EWR for the weekend.
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 14042914)
The Brandywine Valley, to an extent, yes. You'd be surprised how well our packages that involve admissions to Winterthur and Longwood Gardens sell. Granted, these packages are competing for market share with Holland America and real estate in Palm Beach County, but yeah.
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 14042897)
Never mind social events like weddings. All of the above happens for leisure hotel stays. Granted we're by no means a bargain-basement property, but if you're paying $399/night with no point earning other than the form of payment, and a $6 parking differential creates a schism, then may I suggest that you consider another vacation destination.
ETA: I just want to make sure the above does not come across as me saying that I think valets are useless or that I don't value the services they offer. This is definitely not the case. I just don't think they're for everyone in every situation. |
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 14042897)
if you're paying $399/night with no point earning other than the form of payment, and a $6 parking differential creates a schism, then may I suggest that you consider another vacation destination.
|
Good morning box.
|
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 14042926)
For some, I think it's the principle of paying for someone to park your car and bring it back to you when you are perfectly capable of doing it yourself (hey, it's good exercise! :)).
|
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 14042926)
For some, I think it's the principle of paying for someone to park your car and bring it back to you when you are perfectly capable of doing it yourself (hey, it's good exercise! :)). If valet is the only option, I have no problem paying for it, but given the choice I will almost always select self-parking (unless it makes more monetary sense to go with valet). My preference to self-park doesn't change based on the price of the hotel or event at which I am parking.
ETA: I just want to make sure the above does not come across as me saying that I think valets are useless or that I don't value the services they offer. This is definitely not the case. I just don't think they're for everyone in every situation. |
Originally Posted by xFF
(Post 14042965)
True, but isn't a big point of leisure travel (to resorts or destinations, particularly) -for most everyone, I'd guess- to have done for you what you have to do as part of your day to day life?
|
Originally Posted by photog72
(Post 14042925)
When I lived in PHL, I never thought of that area as a vacation destination. I looked at it as part of the PHL destination, especially the tax free shopping part. I'm guessing that nationally, people don't think of Wilmington as a vacation area. They just think about Wilmington as their bank's HQ.;)
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 14042926)
For some, I think it's the principle of paying for someone to park your car and bring it back to you when you are perfectly capable of doing it yourself (hey, it's good exercise! :)). If valet is the only option, I have no problem paying for it, but given the choice I will almost always select self-parking (unless it makes more monetary sense to go with valet). My preference to self-park doesn't change based on the price of the hotel or event at which I am parking.
Some of leisure clientele would take hours to get to their self-parked car, and for much of our client base as heavy on biz travel as it is, it's more so they don't have to be bothered...this would include them being told that their car will be there in 10 minutes, and them showing up 45 minutes later wondering why the car isn't there. |
Originally Posted by sdm1130
(Post 14042926)
ETA: I just want to make sure the above does not come across as me saying that I think valets are useless or that I don't value the services they offer. This is definitely not the case. I just don't think they're for everyone in every situation.
Originally Posted by xFF
(Post 14042930)
Maybe that's part of it: al a carte pushback: "Hey, I'm dropping four bens a night on this dump, and you nickel and dime me to park?" Ownership and revenue segmentation are probably not concepts easily learned at the front door.
I have to get in the shower and go back to work. I feel like I was just there. |
Originally Posted by mwg25
(Post 14042981)
Agreed. To me, it's just one more of those things in life where money gives one a choice (albeit a minor choice in this case).
But I think my point above does stand: for many people, the price they paid on Hotels.com, or where ever, might include some sticker shock which makes al a carte items or services *seem* inequitable. |
Just read a news blurb about the finals of the National Geographic Bee which were apparently held the other day. The winning question was the identification of Cap-Haitien as the largest city in northern Haiti; I would NOT have known that. :confused:
I imagine we MUST have some people in here who did this in middle school, yes? (I remember it being nerve-wracking but rather fun - went to the OH state competition 2 years but never made the finals. Scored a nice atlas, a couple of savings bonds and other random prizes...) And, sadly, it is a STAGGERINGLY unbalanced activity in terms of gender lines - which is even more perplexing considering that the Scripps-Howard Spelling Bee, which is a similar type of thing (head-to-head competition, memorization, etc.), has been pretty close to even over the years. I would have thought that if one had to stereotype, that girls of that age are better at highly-disciplined-book-learning, no? |
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 14043034)
I have to get in the shower and go back to work.
Edit: Aw, man! I just looked, and it's 90/56% already, heat index 96 (Duh, it's noon). Ecuador...hmm... |
Originally Posted by Mackieman
(Post 14042135)
Nifty, CO rotated the equipment schedule around last night apparently. My 735 for AUS - EWR and EWR - CLT is now a 738 and a 73G respectively. ^
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:49 am. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.