![]() |
|
Originally Posted by CO 1E
(Post 13865859)
WWTBD
Reasons:
|
Originally Posted by CO 1E
(Post 13865859)
WWTBD: LH just opened up F space on IAD-FRA tomorrow. Should I sacrifice the BOS-FRA line and the 346 for the convenience of skipping BOS and US? The IAD-FRA flight arrives only 1.5 hours later than FRA-BOS, but I still have to slog it out to IAD from downtown DC.
This is a tough decision. ! You are still on LH F, and not UA ! You do not have to (1) fly US and (2) change terminals at BOS ! You will likely get more sleep on the IAD-FRA (longer flight, leaves and arrives a bit later) ! I am not particularly interested in new lines or types, though. |
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 13865756)
! Cost cut? Or do you fund your own office coffeepot?
I actually do many of the weekends without caffeine until making a cup or two of tea (or such) at brunch. |
Originally Posted by icurhere2
(Post 13865913)
Not playing along with "talk like CO IT" day.
I actually do many of the weekends without caffeine until making a cup or two of tea (or such) at brunch. |
Originally Posted by icurhere2
(Post 13865913)
I actually do many of the weekends without caffeine until making a cup or two of tea (or such) at brunch.
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 13865928)
Weekends without caffeine is an unfathomable thought for me.
|
Originally Posted by CO 1E
(Post 13865808)
! Yes, C and D at IAD were supposed to be temporary. Turns out that "temporary" meant "20+ years." :rolleyes:
|
Another reason not to eat at PF Changs.
|
Doing a search on co.com for IAH-FLL. Search the nearest airport and co.com considers RSW and EYW "nearby" airports?!?!:confused::confused: Nearby in whose drug induced mind?:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13865877)
! LH nonstop
Reasons:
! I could route through BOS on the return, but the timing is inconvenient (and I would have to fly US again, of course :rolleyes:). ! And yes, I have done the terminal shuffle in BOS several times, with baggage; it thoroughly sucks. |
Originally Posted by photog72
(Post 13866164)
Doing a search on co.com for IAH-FLL. Search the nearest airport and co.com considers RSW and EYW "nearby" airports?!?!:confused::confused: Nearby in whose drug induced mind?:rolleyes:
http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gcmap?PAT...NGE-COLOR=navy I do nearby searches for PHL and get all three WAS airports. http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gcmap?PAT...NGE-COLOR=navy |
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 13866207)
I think the criteria that CO.com uses for nearby is 150 miles. Both EYW and RSW meet that criteria.
http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gcmap?PAT...NGE-COLOR=navy I do nearby searches for PHL and get all three WAS airports. http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gcmap?PAT...NGE-COLOR=navy |
Originally Posted by photog72
(Post 13866241)
If you look at the map w/ Florida. You might as well include NAS.:rolleyes: 150 miles is not nearby, as far as I am concerned. More like 50-100 miles. If you consider PHL, then you would have to consider NYC airports, since they're about 90-100 miles away.:rolleyes:
! And yes, a nearby search for PHL does return LGA and EWR. ! ETA: New feature. Advanced Search used to have a checkbox of 150 miles or nothing at all. Now it's a dropdown menu with steps of range from 25 to 300 in 25-mile steps. |
Originally Posted by icurhere2
(Post 13865913)
Not playing along with "talk like CO IT" day.
I actually do many of the weekends without caffeine until making a cup or two of tea (or such) at brunch. |
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 13866251)
! ETA: New feature. Advanced Search used to have a checkbox of 150 miles or nothing at all. Now it's a dropdown menu with steps of range from 25 to 300 in 25-mile steps.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18 pm. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.