Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

ARCHIVE: 2015-17 AA Premium Economy / PE / PEY on widebody a/c announced

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

ARCHIVE: 2015-17 AA Premium Economy / PE / PEY on widebody a/c announced

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2017, 7:14 pm
  #661  
dw
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: NYC/LA
Programs: DL Plat, AA Plat Pro, Marriott Titanium, IHG Diamond Amb
Posts: 7,487
People seem to think that PE redemptions might also come with changes to upgrade rules (and maybe even award chart increases to premium cabin awards ), so perhaps the longer it takes the better? ;-)
dw is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2017, 7:42 pm
  #662  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by dw
People seem to think that PE redemptions might also come with changes to upgrade rules (and maybe even award chart increases to premium cabin awards ), so perhaps the longer it takes the better? ;-)
Most definitely something to be said for that line of thinking.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2017, 7:11 am
  #663  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,405
Just curious - how do AA's PEY seats compare to - say - CX's? Just from the picture looks like AA's don't recline as much, but hard to say.

Originally Posted by dw
People seem to think that PE redemptions might also come with changes to upgrade rules (and maybe even award chart increases to premium cabin awards ), so perhaps the longer it takes the better? ;-)
Sigh - we are due for another unannounced deval are't we? Glad we burned off some miles when we had the chance! Personally as long as PEY is priced reasonably and one can still upgrade discount PEY to J for the same miles+copay rates, I'd be ok with it. Might be in the minority here though so I get that.
no1cub17 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2017, 7:25 am
  #664  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, LT Gold
Posts: 3,148
Originally Posted by no1cub17
Just curious - how do AA's PEY seats compare to - say - CX's? Just from the picture looks like AA's don't recline as much, but hard to say.
I can't compare it to CX, but I can compare it to JL.

The JL seat is the easy winner. Mainly because the seat is a shell, and therefore the seat in front of you does not recline into your pitch space at all. It's incredibly spacious. It is listed at 42" of pitch, vs. AA's 38". But, again, when you recline the AA seat, your pitch is cut way back.

I was very surprised at how far the JL seat reclined. I think it's more than AA's, because it slides /articulates forward to recline vs. just reclining back.

Also, the JL seat is cloth. Much more comfortable, IMO.

JL is behind on the soft service, though. It's just a Y service in PY, basically. AA's drink / meal service is better.
econometrics is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2017, 8:03 am
  #665  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: Double OWE (AA EXP, QF Plat), FI Gold
Posts: 1,887
Originally Posted by econometrics
AA's drink / meal service is better.
It's not often you get to read/write those words!
zpaul is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2017, 8:12 am
  #666  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, LT Gold
Posts: 3,148
Originally Posted by zpaul
It's not often you get to read/write those words!
Lol. No joke. ^
econometrics is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2017, 8:27 am
  #667  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,237
Originally Posted by econometrics
I can't compare it to CX, but I can compare it to JL.

The JL seat is the easy winner. Mainly because the seat is a shell, and therefore the seat in front of you does not recline into your pitch space at all. It's incredibly spacious.
That's interesting, because that's the case with the AF PE seat, and a lot of people seem to hate that seat. (And certainly the fixed shell economy seat on CX was a disaster).

It is listed at 42" of pitch, vs. AA's 38".
Well, obviously that's a key consideration!
ijgordon is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2017, 9:33 am
  #668  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX - AUS
Programs: AA Platinum, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott
Posts: 1,625
Originally Posted by econometrics
JL is behind on the soft service, though. It's just a Y service in PY, basically. AA's drink / meal service is better.
You better delete this part...we don't want to give Doug Parker any ideas on what more to cut
Austin787 is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2017, 9:46 pm
  #669  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DFW Texas
Programs: AA (ExecPlat, >2MM), United (Gold, >1 MM), HH (Diamond), SPG (Gold), Accorhotels (Gold)
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by scnzzz
My guess is that a devaluation long term would feel less impactful if dosed out in stages. Hence my speculation (freely admitted that I have no basis in fact or insight to back it up, and I'd love to be proven wrong and to hear that this isn't going to be the case from someone like you) that USdbaAA, in a less competitive, less over-capacity air travel market, is slowly boiling the frog. And going from 8 to 4 SWUs is the heat level set at simmer, with the boil setting to come in the next year or so.

Obviously nothing I can do about it except take my business elsewhere (there is GS-level spend going to UA from me these days - that could have gone to AA)...but I have no faith or expectations in the current management team that they will use the FF program as a competitive value proposition to attract flyers.
I just talked to AA about something odd I saw on some flights (DFW-HKG) - no upgrades offered. I called the EXP desk to inquire and the person I spoke with said that even though there were lots of seats, none would be offered as upgrades (using systemwides), but you could waitlist. Maybe score a battlefield upgrade at the gate (as all of mine have been as of late). She went on to say that when PE is up and running, systemwides will take you up "one class of service" i.e., up to PE, not Business. I flew in a new PE seat (DFW-GRU), and the pitch sucks. Not a huge amount better than MCE to tell the truth, and certainly not worth the $600-$700 they are charging. If they really devalue the systemwide upgrades that much, then I'll switch to United. Unless they give lifetime PltPro @ 3 million miles. I'll hit that, then switch to United.
PolarRoute is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2017, 6:42 am
  #670  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, LT Gold
Posts: 3,148
Originally Posted by PolarRoute
She went on to say that when PE is up and running, systemwides will take you up "one class of service" i.e., up to PE, not Business.
She is incorrect, and should read her employer's statement on this.

I flew in a new PE seat (DFW-GRU), and the pitch sucks. Not a huge amount better than MCE to tell the truth, and certainly not worth the $600-$700 they are charging. If they really devalue the systemwide upgrades that much, then I'll switch to United. Unless they give lifetime PltPro @ 3 million miles. I'll hit that, then switch to United.
I wouldn't say the pitch "sucks", as 38" pitch is basically the standard in PY products. But, I do agree that it could be better. JL has 42", e.g., with a shell so your pitch stays at 42" no matter what position your seat - or the seat in front of you - is in. ^
econometrics is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2017, 7:58 am
  #671  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by PolarRoute
I just talked to AA about something odd I saw on some flights (DFW-HKG) - no upgrades offered. I called the EXP desk to inquire and the person I spoke with said that even though there were lots of seats, none would be offered as upgrades (using systemwides), but you could waitlist.
The explanation you were given doesn't make any sense.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2017, 8:07 am
  #672  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: CUR
Posts: 2,170
Originally Posted by JonNYC
The explanation you were given doesn't make any sense.
Sounds like either the agent explained in incorrectly, or the poster misunderstood it.

Looks like it went the way it normally does. No C inventory available, so no upgrades available, thus waitlist.
Djokison is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2017, 10:12 am
  #673  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,237
Originally Posted by JonNYC
The explanation you were given doesn't make any sense.
I assume that expecting any explanation of revenue management policies/practices from a reservations agent to make sense is just folly.
ijgordon is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2017, 2:48 pm
  #674  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SNA
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat, Marriott Gold, National EE
Posts: 1,204
Originally Posted by no1cub17
Just curious - how do AA's PEY seats compare to - say - CX's? Just from the picture looks like AA's don't recline as much, but hard to say.
Just flew my first AA PEY. I was disappointed by the recline and comfort. AA's (fake?) leather felt less comfortable than CX's cloth seats. Without knowing how to compare the two, it's possible the recline is very similar, but I had a less comfortable time sleeping.

Food was great--the quinoa for breakfast looked awful but ended up tasting surprisingly good. Service delivery was not so pleasant--I got the sense FAs were doing me a favor doing service. (e.g. I'll check to see if I can get you some water, in the middle of the flight)
ralphs is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 3:00 pm
  #675  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, LT Gold
Posts: 3,148
Originally Posted by ralphs
Food was great--the quinoa for breakfast looked awful but ended up tasting surprisingly good. Service delivery was not so pleasant--I got the sense FAs were doing me a favor doing service. (e.g. I'll check to see if I can get you some water, in the middle of the flight)
It's documented that there are less FA per pax on the 789 planes, which is why you experienced a not so pleasant delivery of service.

It's noticeably slower in J, too.
econometrics is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.