The R Games
#1681
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,156
Thats what I meant. J=9. But the seat map showed 11 empty seats. I assume they were empty since in J AC assigns a seat even if upg which you can then change.
I am sure I will be corrected if my assumption was incorrect.
I did get upgraded on the flight so not an issue, the questions are so I can be better informed for future decisions.
I am sure I will be corrected if my assumption was incorrect.
I did get upgraded on the flight so not an issue, the questions are so I can be better informed for future decisions.
AC introduced J bidding and LMU. They probably want to reserve a higher no. of J seats for this purpose until the last minute before clearing the eUpgrade. There may be other factors such as deadheading crew that may show up at the last minute unannounced such as the recent UA case, potential misconnection due to other later arriving flights, etc. Once your eUpgrade is confirmed but later downgraded back to Y, it's my understanding that AC has to pay you compensation.
Those who really want to fly in J would have bought a J ticket. That's another topic. On Canada-USA transborder routes, if AC would match the P (or equivalent discount J fares) of many American airlines, I am sure that its cabins will be a lot fuller. I just bought a J ticket for MIA-YYZ for January 2018 on AA for about C$450 all-in one way. It is nearly half the price of what ACr demanded for that same week on the same route on Premier Rouge. Both are direct non-stop.
#1682
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
....Those who really want to fly in J would have bought a J ticket. That's another topic. On Canada-USA transborder routes, if AC would match the P (or equivalent discount J fares) of many American airlines, I am sure that its cabins will be a lot fuller. I just bought a J ticket for MIA-YYZ for January 2018 on AA for about C$450 all-in one way. It is nearly half the price of what ACr demanded for that same week on the same route on Premier Rouge. Both are direct non-stop.
I think "those who want to fly in J..." vary dramatically by route.
There are at least a couple of us who would not pay cash or upgrade credits for even a domestic or TB transcon. I know what I get on those flights and I have my own determination of the value proposition.
Also, there are those who would prefer to use their upgrades for longer routes or for travel with spouse/partner, whatever.
As for paying for J on TB, I'm perfectly happy paying AA $725 CAD RT for J on the non-stop YYZ-MIA (which is the rate I'm seeing from now on out for a number of months).
AC rouge, OTOH, sits at $1,321.
For those who want to accumulate AC miles towards whatever their goal is (AQM, MM), feel free to pay the $1,321.
My guess is AC has determined that there are just enough people will to pay for the front of the rouge bus to MIA, for e.g. either with cash or upgrades, that they do not see AA non-stop - or others with one-stop - as viable competition.
#1684
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,354
For a minute I thought you meant "cabin", to which I would have said "Yes, that's why I'm posting in this thread "
Haha I know right?
Actually V. There was a $105 CAD (base fare) published for SFO-YYJ in V class. It only lasted a few days.
I was seriously considering booking another airline, or using miles, until that showed up.
Actually V. There was a $105 CAD (base fare) published for SFO-YYJ in V class. It only lasted a few days.
I was seriously considering booking another airline, or using miles, until that showed up.
#1685
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Y lat lol
I guess I should've been more precice, but yeah was wondering too.
It should come out of Z though, IIRC.
And for the record, Iv'e seen it clear out of D1Z0R0 for another FTer. But maybe that was some weird thing going on with the way AC manages inventory now. FP booking on ACr.
I guess I should've been more precice, but yeah was wondering too.
It should come out of Z though, IIRC.
And for the record, Iv'e seen it clear out of D1Z0R0 for another FTer. But maybe that was some weird thing going on with the way AC manages inventory now. FP booking on ACr.
#1686
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,354
I was somewhat impressed by this upgrade clearing though. It's down to J4, so the flight is not wide open.
I also know there are three SEs booked on the flight in X on a J reward ticket, so that will be fun at the gate
I also know there are three SEs booked on the flight in X on a J reward ticket, so that will be fun at the gate
#1688
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: FOTSG Tangerine Ex E35k (AC)
Posts: 5,612
Why is the fact that it cleared a surprise though? You requested it, got waitlisted, on V no less (so still low flex, but above G/W or is low flex low flex regardless of QVWG) and then when R space was opened they moved you into it.
Unless there were other SE who requested it before you, or SEMM+ ... why is that a surprise? Now for me sure, I'd be surprised that no-one else with a higher status beat me to the waitlist... the times I have been waitlisted (only perhaps 2-3 times), I did not get an upgrade, but that's because I'm a lowly non-snowflake
If there are three X on J's at the gate, and J=4, they'll all be fine. If J is 2, one is outta luck, clearly. They'll determine that by any MM status, then check-in time one assumes as fare class is the same. If I was one of those SE's, I'd be checking in at t-24 if the AC website actually allows it.
In terms of fare, if it was due out to Z (isn't that like P and D?) then this is the wrong thread. eUps definitely shouldn't come out of D, unless you are in IRROPs and an agent manages to book you into whatever is still open ignoring any potential incorrect AQM adjustments.
Unless there were other SE who requested it before you, or SEMM+ ... why is that a surprise? Now for me sure, I'd be surprised that no-one else with a higher status beat me to the waitlist... the times I have been waitlisted (only perhaps 2-3 times), I did not get an upgrade, but that's because I'm a lowly non-snowflake
If there are three X on J's at the gate, and J=4, they'll all be fine. If J is 2, one is outta luck, clearly. They'll determine that by any MM status, then check-in time one assumes as fare class is the same. If I was one of those SE's, I'd be checking in at t-24 if the AC website actually allows it.
In terms of fare, if it was due out to Z (isn't that like P and D?) then this is the wrong thread. eUps definitely shouldn't come out of D, unless you are in IRROPs and an agent manages to book you into whatever is still open ignoring any potential incorrect AQM adjustments.
#1689
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,354
If there are three X on J's at the gate, and J=4, they'll all be fine. If J is 2, one is outta luck, clearly. They'll determine that by any MM status, then check-in time one assumes as fare class is the same. If I was one of those SE's, I'd be checking in at t-24 if the AC website actually allows it.
#1690
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: FOTSG Tangerine Ex E35k (AC)
Posts: 5,612
You seem to be implying that RM knows more than you, and that AC IT is doing something that you consider logical. Which of these seem likely to you?
You could always give up your J seat to someone in need and sit in Y.
Just to confirm, please apply the required emoticons to both the above
Oh, and I gave up betting when Mr. Peever had his 2017 package delivered.
You could always give up your J seat to someone in need and sit in Y.
Just to confirm, please apply the required emoticons to both the above
Oh, and I gave up betting when Mr. Peever had his 2017 package delivered.
#1691
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mississauga Ontario
Posts: 4,105
I figure they are generally as IT incompetent as the rest of the IT infrastructure, and that if 2% of the IT skills on this board could have at it, we'd see a dramatic improvement in all things RM related at the same time that R-games would not have to be a game.
#1692
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,354
Can I ask a question? Given that AC tends to fail at anything it does with IT (don't get me going on the new iPhone app, which is useless...), why is there this mysterious aura around RM, that they are demigods of analytics, with deep insights that allow them to max things..... there just seems to be this belief that they are omnipotent.
I figure they are generally as IT incompetent as the rest of the IT infrastructure, and that if 2% of the IT skills on this board could have at it, we'd see a dramatic improvement in all things RM related at the same time that R-games would not have to be a game.
I figure they are generally as IT incompetent as the rest of the IT infrastructure, and that if 2% of the IT skills on this board could have at it, we'd see a dramatic improvement in all things RM related at the same time that R-games would not have to be a game.
#1693
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: FOTSG Tangerine Ex E35k (AC)
Posts: 5,612
I don't believe I've ever posted my thoughts about RM which I assume is Resource Management or something. Not prior to my post above that is.
But regardless of how omnipotent they are, presumably they are not pushing placards of people around and are instead using computer systems written by the same IT teams that gave us everything else.
While I don't want to veer too sharply into the challenges that Air Canada Information Technology may experience, this does seem to be of particular relevance to this thread because it makes us consider if the fault lies with the team, or with the tools that team has at their disposal.
I was once told a bad workman blames his tools. 30 minutes later the same guy found the system (a science experiment) wasn't working and blamed the equipment. He got angry when I quoted him back at himself.
A good workman that can't do the job because of his tools, is correct to blame those tools.
But regardless of how omnipotent they are, presumably they are not pushing placards of people around and are instead using computer systems written by the same IT teams that gave us everything else.
While I don't want to veer too sharply into the challenges that Air Canada Information Technology may experience, this does seem to be of particular relevance to this thread because it makes us consider if the fault lies with the team, or with the tools that team has at their disposal.
I was once told a bad workman blames his tools. 30 minutes later the same guy found the system (a science experiment) wasn't working and blamed the equipment. He got angry when I quoted him back at himself.
A good workman that can't do the job because of his tools, is correct to blame those tools.
#1694
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,354
I was told relatively recently (I'm pretty sure it was 2017) that waitlisted upgrades are cleared manually, and there's no automated process to do it.
So it wouldn't be anything written by AC IT
So it wouldn't be anything written by AC IT
#1695
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: FOTSG Tangerine Ex E35k (AC)
Posts: 5,612
Thing is, they may clear them manually... but presumably they do this after looking at expected loads. And while I don't want to bet on anything as recently posted... I would wager a small amount the details for this as being shown on some sort of computer generated display. Probably a 17" CRT.
I don't know. It's the R games. Anyone else thinking of the Hunger games right now? Losers to into Y. Or Rouge.