Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Consolidated "Lufthansa Upgrade With UA SWU Questions/Experiences" Thread [2010/11]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Consolidated "Lufthansa Upgrade With UA SWU Questions/Experiences" Thread [2010/11]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2011, 1:14 am
  #436  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by oliver2002
The missing communication between UA and LH about this is as old as the SWUs.

Raising a stink at the MUC portion of SMD3 will help nothing..
I have to agree here - it is a standby instrument and LH can not clear the standby whenever they don't feel like it. While they must deny you an ug if you are in an 'illegal' fare bucket, there is little pressure on them to clear you if you are on one which UA claims is permitted.

And limiting SWU upgrades to fare buckets which also work for miles and eVocuhers isn't really unfair, given that one can snag a Z->F ug for a fraction of the "membership cost".
weero is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2011, 8:27 am
  #437  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
So you're saying let LH screw me over and forget about it?

But let's actually confirm if this is a fact or not. We have no evidence that LH is denying upgrades on the K fare at the moment. Your speculation is based on its own M&M upgrade rule changes and may well have nothing to do with those applicable to the UA SWUs. The previous post that sparked the supposition comes from someone trying to upgrade from an L fare, based on 2009/10 rules, and clearly not permitted under the currently posted 2011/12 rules.

Next time I am at an airport where LH check-in is being handled, I will ask one of the agents what is displayed on their screen vis a vis the UA SWUs. If LH has unilaterally made a change, then I will contact UA first since it is their instrument that is being invalidated and they have not been informed, and their elites have not been informed. They have the ultimate responsibility at my end on these matters.
Shareholder is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2011, 8:31 am
  #438  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,632
Originally Posted by weero
I have to agree here - it is a standby instrument and LH can not clear the standby whenever they don't feel like it. While they must deny you an ug if you are in an 'illegal' fare bucket, there is little pressure on them to clear you if you are on one which UA claims is permitted.

And limiting SWU upgrades to fare buckets which also work for miles and eVocuhers isn't really unfair, given that one can snag a Z->F ug for a fraction of the "membership cost".
A standby upgrade is supposed to be cleared based on space availability, not on the basis of whether the airline feels like it.

If it has to do with LH's feelings, this should be stated in the printed rules. If it is based on certain fare classes, these classes should be specified in the printed rules.

Why do you say that stating certain rules on the SWU and then following different rules "isn't really unfair"? It seems to be to be a particularly blatant example of deceptive practices.
SeeBuyFly is online now  
Old Aug 2, 2011, 8:48 am
  #439  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,187
Feel free to scream and yell etc as much as you like, its a free country/world. @:-)

K is the absolute lowest fare bucket in long haul since the July 1 realignment:

http://www.vielfliegertreff.de/conte...angstrecke.gif



The first K fares have appeared in Germany for TATL, I'm pretty sure CO will start filing them ex US for the upcoming winter this or next week. The additional T/L/K buckets under S are meant to provide smaller pricing steps so customers don't turn away when the lowest fare class is sold out.

I seriously doubt anyone at United or Lufthansa will budge for this even if you stand in front of them and hold your breath... at most you will get an assurance that they will update the fine print in the paper stock soon.
oliver2002 is online now  
Old Aug 2, 2011, 10:22 am
  #440  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
I guess that's the difference between NAmericans and Europeans. We don't take .... from anyone! We fight 'til the end for justice. And small claims courts are quite responsive to citizen suits against large corporations. I'd love nothing more than to take LH (and UA) to court over this breach of contract!
Shareholder is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2011, 11:44 am
  #441  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,632
Originally Posted by oliver2002
... at most you will get an assurance that they will update the fine print in the paper stock soon.
That's all that is necessary, except it should happen when the rules changed, not at some undefined time later.

If someone buys a ticket based on printed rules, why is it ok to screw that person over? (Fortunately your post saved me from this fate.)
SeeBuyFly is online now  
Old Aug 2, 2011, 4:04 pm
  #442  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,187
Originally Posted by SeeBuyFly
(Fortunately your post saved me from this fate.)
Thank you. That was the purpose of the post. ^
oliver2002 is online now  
Old Aug 3, 2011, 4:26 am
  #443  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by Shareholder
So you're saying let LH screw me over and forget about it?
You cannot be certain who actually is screwing you (if anyone is after all). Just because the idiots at UA still print a wrong voucher after years of experience doesn't make it a LH GA's fault.
..We have no evidence that LH is denying upgrades on the K fare at the moment. Your speculation is based on its own M&M upgrade rule changes and may well have nothing to do with those applicable to the UA SWUs.
I myself have of course not tried it. But my boss' GF managed to get bounced on a W fare.
Originally Posted by SeeBuyFly
A standby upgrade is supposed to be cleared based on space availability, not on the basis of whether the airline feels like it.

If it has to do with LH's feelings, this should be stated in the printed rules.
And it does. But for some odd reason, they do not perfectly coincide with UA's artwork on the matter.
Why do you say that stating certain rules on the SWU and then following different rules "isn't really unfair"? It seems to be to be a particularly blatant example of deceptive practices.
I say that because it is a standby upgrade instrument.

And the above reasoning.

Originally Posted by Shareholder
I guess that's the difference between NAmericans and Europeans. We don't take .... from anyone! We fight 'til the end for justice. And small claims courts are quite responsive to citizen suits against large corporations. I'd love nothing more than to take LH (and UA) to court over this breach of contract!
Which contract?

You don't have a contract with LH regarding your printed SWUs. You can take them back to UA, complain, get the $200 domestic-only voucher, and they will convert the SWU back into the electronic SWU.

How would you even explain that to a small claims court???

LH commits all kind of crimes. Heck these are the boys who ever so often do not honour paid fares, try to bounce folks on oversold flights based on made-up visa fairy-tales in order not to pay IDB compensation.
I'd never expect them to live up to a duty which isn't really their duty to begin with.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Aug 3, 2011 at 11:04 am Reason: merge
weero is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2011, 4:38 pm
  #444  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: UA 1K, SPG P, DL vanilla
Posts: 37
Odds for a UA SWU voucher on LH?

What are the odds that I'll get a successful upgrade from C to F using a UA SWU paper upgrade? SFO-FRA on a Wednesday.
antitouchscreen is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2011, 4:55 pm
  #445  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,752
The odds are, without any margin of error, 55.5877 to 44.7988077

zrs70 is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2011, 5:09 pm
  #446  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DCA or IAD (originally DUB)
Programs: UA 1K 1.8MM, Hertz PC, Marriott Platinum/Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,657
Originally Posted by antitouchscreen
What are the odds that I'll get a successful upgrade from C to F using a UA SWU paper upgrade? SFO-FRA on a Wednesday.
Did you try looking here http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...2010-11-a.html before posting?
UAPremExecflyer is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2011, 9:09 pm
  #447  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: Lifetime UA 1K, Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 1,261
The odds low this time of the year. With the dollar so weak it seems like all of Germany is vacationing in California right now. I've been on FRA-LAX and FRA-SFO recently and didn't get upgraded.
bldr1k is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2011, 7:57 pm
  #448  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
Received UA certs today and they bear the new MP logo so are the newest issued. The restricted fare classes clearly outlined on the front and back of the cert are: L, X, I, R, N, E, S, W, ID, AD and IP. No mention of K exclusion.
Shareholder is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2011, 8:49 pm
  #449  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by Shareholder
Received UA certs today and they bear the new MP logo so are the newest issued. The restricted fare classes clearly outlined on the front and back of the cert are: L, X, I, R, N, E, S, W, ID, AD and IP. No mention of K exclusion.
Then you should book a ride in K and use it for upgrading to Biz,

Should be fun.

Make sure to reserve a good seat in coach before anything else!

Last edited by weero; Aug 9, 2011 at 11:09 am Reason: typo
weero is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 10:28 pm
  #450  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Raleigh
Programs: United GS 2MM,, Marriott/Starwood Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 754
Originally Posted by SAN 1K
I'm flying SAN-SFO (UA); SFO-FRA (UA); FRA-DOH (LH) soon.
Two questions:
1. Any chance I can request my upgrade on the LH leg when I'm in SFO? Are there LH agents secure-side (other than the gate agents, who I would suspect are too busy for such requests)? (I'm thinking of something similar to that LH staff in the ORD B18 RCC).
2. The FRA-DOH flight (LH 620) makes some type of stop, I think (perhaps Manama, Bahrain?). But it's ticketed as a single flight. Will on SWU cover the whole thing?
OK, I'm back from this trip, so I'll provide some input on these issues for reference.
1. I went to the A380 LH customer service counter at the gate. Actually the staff wasn't so busy and had time to talk with me. They told me that because my SFO-FRA flight was on UA - that they had no access at all to my onward flight. So they couldn't put me on the upgrade list. When I got back to the UA IFL and told the receptionist my story, she indicated that she had heard the same from other passengers - essentially, LH locks the outstations from seeing itineraries except those in which they are directly involved.
2. It did indeed only take one SWU to get from FRA-DOH, even though we stopped in Riyhad (exactly as soneone else had posted). I got this cleared at the upstairs service counter at FRA, about 3 hours before departure. It was a 747 with the new 2-seat-per-person arrangement, so a total of 8 available "seats", and I think there were 5 of us up there. Once again the LH F-class food/beverage service was positively outstanding, if not actually excessive to the point of being humorous. And of course this got me access to the F-class terminal in FRA which allowed me to go for a nice 5-mile run during my connection.
By the way, I also upgraded MUC-ORD on the return of this trip (I'm just burning up the certs!). It was the exact same menu, which was a dissapointment, but I made the best of it. The MUC F-class lounge is really nothing compared to FRA. Not even the same champagne selection, no car service, etc.

Last edited by SAN 1K; Aug 11, 2011 at 10:29 pm Reason: clarity
SAN 1K is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.