Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Earn more PQMs for premium cabin travel starting in 2016

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Dec 16, 2015, 2:20 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: FlyHighInTheSky
Originally Posted by UA Insider
Hi everyone,

Starting January 1, 2016, you’ll earn more Premier qualifying miles (PQMs) for full-fare and discounted First or Business – up to double the current rate. The higher PQM rates go into effect for flights starting January 1, 2016 regardless of booking date.

New 2016 PQM Earning for United and United Express:

Full-fare First or Business (F, J): 300% (Currently 150%)
Discounted First or Business (A, C, D, Z, P): 200% (Currently 150%)
Full-fare Economy (Y, B): 150% (No Change)
Discounted Economy (M, E, U, H, Q, V, W, S, T, L, K, G, N): 100% (No Change)

Please check back shortly for full details regarding this change at mileageplusupdates.com. In addition to United and United Express operated flights, PQM earnings for select Star Alliance partners are also increasing.

Thank you,

-UA Insider
Originally Posted by UA Insider
This change does not impact PQS.

UA Insider
Originally Posted by UA Insider
Hi everyone. For clarification, there are no changes to the PQD credit card waiver.

-UA Insider
Print Wikipost

Earn more PQMs for premium cabin travel starting in 2016

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2015, 9:14 am
  #136  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: AA Plat, UA 1K>Plat>moving to Silver
Posts: 2,090
"The lower-tier HVFs will simply be buying into F instead of thinking an upgrade might clear."

I haven't thought that for years. This will just give me more of an incentive to buy more international BF on UA versus another airline - if it gives me the GPUs, and assuming there is still enough R space available at booking, the only kind I look for, to use a few of them on a leg here or there to keep the cost down.
Artpen100 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 9:17 am
  #137  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,419
Originally Posted by ORDAuD
I did see that thread. A mix of people who pay their own way and ones who are able to charge their company (or a client) for a first class ticket. They must not use the same software that my company does. It forces the absolute cheapest fare regardless of airline. It even creates an overnight stay even if that makes the overall trip more expensive.
Can't you still pass up the cheaper overnight, and have your boss approve the red flag flight?
LASUA1K is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 9:20 am
  #138  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott/SPG/Hilton Gold, PreCheck + Clear
Posts: 2,306
Originally Posted by bldr1k
It is surprising they are so focused on people buying business or first.

B or Y coach fares are far more profitable than a discounted first class ticket. They generally cost more than first and the cost of the seat space and service is less than half that of the coach seat.

Y and B should be 300% PQMs.
There's a critical distinction though: buying a premium cabin seat is always discretionary, so UA may want to incentivize it.

By contrast, buying a Y or B fare generally represents a business or personal need for flexible or last-minute travel. UA may see no reason to incentivize those purchases further by providing additional PQM, even if the actual profitability of those transactions is greater.
RandomBaritone is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 10:01 am
  #139  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,138
Originally Posted by RandomBaritone
There's a critical distinction though: buying a premium cabin seat is always discretionary, so UA may want to incentivize it.
Well, except in the very limited cases of contractual front cabin travel (e.g. the SAG). Those don't make up a ton of business, but they were important enough that UA ran 3-class birds on LAX-JFK for years, until the SAG stopped requiring 3-cabin F.


Originally Posted by RandomBaritone
By contrast, buying a Y or B fare generally represents a business or personal need for flexible or last-minute travel. UA may see no reason to incentivize those purchases further by providing additional PQM, even if the actual profitability of those transactions is greater.
This is very true. People aren't buying Y/B without a strong business need, and certainly not in advance without one.


Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
well, that goes back to the question of who's the better customer. The person who flys UA once a year from LAX-DXB in Full F for over $15,000 or the person who's a 1K, flying short hops weekly & barely making 1K or min spend. Any business is going to want that passenger that flys once a year, has no status (and does not care), and gives that airlines more $$ then many of their top tier flyers. That person flying once a year really deserves more recognition, unfortunately the program's just don't work that way
True to a degree, but that neglects the value of a customer you know you have vs. one you hope to have. And as you go on to point out, UA isn't the airline who can count on those full fare F tickets due to the quality of their product.


Originally Posted by bldr1k
It is surprising they are so focused on people buying business or first.

B or Y coach fares are far more profitable than a discounted first class ticket. They generally cost more than first and the cost of the seat space and service is less than half that of the coach seat.

Y and B should be 300% PQMs.
This is one strike against this being the first step toward a purely spend-based approach for status. I suspect spend will play a bigger role as the program evolves (probably with a dual-track program coming soon, with spend + miles *or* spend-only at a higher level as qualifications), but we have a program change which in fact doesn't reward the top economy fares any more than the old one did, yet rewards the generally-cheaper discount front cabin fares significantly more.

OTOH, something else to keep in mind is that Y/B fares are in most cases fully changeable and refundable, which lowers the actual revenue slightly as pax will inevitably change and cancel them with no incremental income to UA and in fact some potential for lost income due to inventory spoilage. Discount F fares still have $200 change fees domestically and $300 internationally, aren't refundable, etc., so if someone cancels or changes, UA pockets that incremental revenue.
exerda is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 10:14 am
  #140  
formerly fkhatibloo
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SFO/OAK
Programs: United 1K & 1MM, Marriott Gold, Starwood Gold, Omni Select
Posts: 182
Sigh. I frequently buy M fares because they're allowable under my company policy, are often immediately upgraded as a 1K. Confoundingly, they're also sometimes more expensive than discount business fares. Such a bummer that we can't benefit from this.
FrenchBullies1975 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 11:50 am
  #141  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA GS 1.7MM, Hyatt Lifetime Glob, Marriott Titanium/Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 1,272
Would rather see the 75k FF mileage cap eliminated, or raised at the very least.
CopperSteve is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 11:51 am
  #142  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,309
Originally Posted by bldr1k
Y and B should be 300% PQMs.
Originally Posted by FrenchBullies1975
Sigh. I frequently buy M fares because they're allowable under my company policy,
No, Y,B and M should be left alone - they are economy fares, and I bet you UA knows exactly how many OPM flyers are forced to buy those fares vs business fares. They already have a mechanism for rewarding Y OPM flyers in RDMs.

Lets leave high status earnings to those who actually buy the premium cabins, not upgrade into it.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 11:56 am
  #143  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott/SPG/Hilton Gold, PreCheck + Clear
Posts: 2,306
Originally Posted by FrenchBullies1975
Sigh. I frequently buy M fares because they're allowable under my company policy, are often immediately upgraded as a 1K. Confoundingly, they're also sometimes more expensive than discount business fares. Such a bummer that we can't benefit from this.
It's definitely a bummer to learn you're not the target audience of a promotion or initiative such as this. UA must believe they're already capturing sufficient revenue from those buying M fares.

P.S. Love your screen name -- I also have a Frenchie.
RandomBaritone is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 12:37 pm
  #144  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K, AA Plat, Global Entry, Citi Prestige, Chase MileagePlus Club
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by RandomBaritone
It's definitely a bummer to learn you're not the target audience of a promotion or initiative such as this. UA must believe they're already capturing sufficient revenue from those buying M fares.
That's pretty much where I land on the whole thing. They are a business, and they have calculated that it makes sense for them to entice/court those spending the big money over us plebs.

In the end, I still think they should just drop all the pretenses of the MP program, status, etc. and just start handing out perks based on money spent because at this point MP is NOT about being a frequent flyer anymore.

Last edited by StringerBellBivDeVoe; Dec 17, 2015 at 12:55 pm
StringerBellBivDeVoe is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 1:08 pm
  #145  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: RDU
Programs: UA Plat 2MM, Delta Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott cardboard
Posts: 1,699
I've been buying up to P from lowest Y fares from my own pocked when the fares are low enough. This change will help me get to 1K for 2017. I have two P-class RDU-HKG trips already booked. I'm happy.

I'm less happy with my zero luck trying to confirm travel to NRT and FRA over 8 months out. It's never been this hard for me before.
dulcamara is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 1:11 pm
  #146  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,604
Originally Posted by exerda
Both very valid points and ones I hope UA starts addressing. It shouldn't be do hard to give UA extra $$.
Agree 100%. At the beginning of 2015, I started my gradual withdrawal from 1K. I used my GPUs early to confirm upgrades at purchase, and during the remainder of the bought discount F for personal travel. Since UA has lost many of the GSA city pair contracts for my business travel, I spent (and will next year) far more time on AA - where my UG rate was happily high.

I look forward to crossing 1MM next year, but my days of doing over 100000 miles a year are thankfully coming to a close.
halls120 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 1:55 pm
  #147  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,138
Originally Posted by halls120
Agree 100%. At the beginning of 2015, I started my gradual withdrawal from 1K. I used my GPUs early to confirm upgrades at purchase, and during the remainder of the bought discount F for personal travel. Since UA has lost many of the GSA city pair contracts for my business travel, I spent (and will next year) far more time on AA - where my UG rate was happily high.

I look forward to crossing 1MM next year, but my days of doing over 100000 miles a year are thankfully coming to a close.
Speaking of being hard to give UA money, I was trying to upfare a POS-IAH leg. The Web site offers it to me in P, for $160 more than my E fare, but then errors out after payment. Calling res, they say it's only available in D for $770 and just to stick out the waitlist. Web Support says they can't offer the P fare because I already have IAH-IAD cleared into R via instrument ().

So far, no one has figured out how to take my $160 (I haven't even gotten far enough to ask for a waiver of the $200 change fee ).

This is common once you have an instrument waitlisted IME; the Web site has major issues offering you an upfare. Why is it hard to give UA money?
exerda is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 2:04 pm
  #148  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: UA-1K MM, AA-Gold, DL-Silver, AS-MVP
Posts: 2,509
Originally Posted by rankourabu
No, Y,B and M should be left alone - they are economy fares, and I bet you UA knows exactly how many OPM flyers are forced to buy those fares vs business fares. They already have a mechanism for rewarding Y OPM flyers in RDMs.

Lets leave high status earnings to those who actually buy the premium cabins, not upgrade into it.
Exactly, Y/B fares are economy fares with added flexibility and the ability to exchange/refund, which doesn't equate to upgrade or premium. The new PQM is the status earning mechanism for premium cabin purchases.
hirohito888 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 2:04 pm
  #149  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,025
Originally Posted by exerda
...So far, no one has figured out how to take my $160...
The bartender at the finest-bar-between-passenger-drop-off-and-the-terminal-doors-in-the-world will take your money at POS (also my vote for best airport code). Mighty fine beer drinking out there.
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2015, 2:05 pm
  #150  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,604
Originally Posted by exerda
This is common once you have an instrument waitlisted IME; the Web site has major issues offering you an upfare. Why is it hard to give UA money?
Excellent question. Earlier this year I was on a US-operated AA flight that I wanted to upgrade using $$. Couldn't do it on line of course, so I called the Plat line. They tried to take my money over the phone, and eventually told me I would have to do it at the airport, which I did.

It seems that UA isn't the only airline that makes it hard.
halls120 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.