Last edit by: WineCountryUA
As of the last update from an inside source, the meal choice prioritization policy is to prioritize in this order:
1. Global Services
2. Premier 1K
3. All other revenue passengers
4. Nonrevs
This prioritization is done in the galley, after taking orders. If you saw a flight crew take orders front to back, but did not see any GS/1K passengers denied their first choice, you have not witnessed a violation of the policy. Indeed, taking orders front to back is correct under the policy.
Post #30
Hi, UA-NYC,
Yes, your assertion is accurate. Premier 1K will still be prioritized as you stated, but again, this is to be done in the galley.
-UA Insider
1. Global Services
2. Premier 1K
3. All other revenue passengers
4. Nonrevs
This prioritization is done in the galley, after taking orders. If you saw a flight crew take orders front to back, but did not see any GS/1K passengers denied their first choice, you have not witnessed a violation of the policy. Indeed, taking orders front to back is correct under the policy.
Post #30
Hi everyone,
As several of you have mentioned, there has been no procedure change to prioritizing premium cabin meal orders.
As a reminder, our standard procedure is to take meal orders from front to back of the cabin and ask for a second choice in case your first choice is not available. After meal orders are taken, our inflight crew will prioritize meal orders in the galley. This way, we can streamline the order-taking processes while eliminating skipping around the cabin for order-taking.
-UA Insider
As several of you have mentioned, there has been no procedure change to prioritizing premium cabin meal orders.
As a reminder, our standard procedure is to take meal orders from front to back of the cabin and ask for a second choice in case your first choice is not available. After meal orders are taken, our inflight crew will prioritize meal orders in the galley. This way, we can streamline the order-taking processes while eliminating skipping around the cabin for order-taking.
-UA Insider
Yes, your assertion is accurate. Premier 1K will still be prioritized as you stated, but again, this is to be done in the galley.
-UA Insider
Current UA Process for Prioritizing Meal Orders in Premium Cabins [ARCHIVE]
#1951
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,878
And anyone who buys domestic F on UA for the meal should have their head examined
![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Kacee is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1952
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
I agree with you. If you pay for F, you should be prioritized higher than an upgrader, no matter who the upgrader is. By the rationale of others saying the opposite, then the upgrader should get the F seat over the person paying for F, too, since the upgrader is "more valuable."
![cmd320 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1953
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Delta Platinum Medallion; IHG Platinum; Marriott Gold; Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,071
It appears that you fly a lot of different airlines so you're not stuck in the United "bubble" like many of us and can see this from an industry view. I appreciate that perspective.
![nycityny is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1954
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
Pay for F, pay for F, pay for F!
So let's just have the manifest show everyone's ticket price since you are hung up on how valuable someone is based on what they bought. Prioritize that way.
So let's just have the manifest show everyone's ticket price since you are hung up on how valuable someone is based on what they bought. Prioritize that way.
![JVPhoto is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1955
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: UA-GS, Hyatt-Defiantly Diamond, Marriott-Platinum, SPG-Platinum
Posts: 499
No, that's exactly the reason! GS and 1k elites ARE more valuable than those without status, no matter the fare paid. As soon as you spend $12k and fly 100k miles, or much more, you can have your first choice, too.
![USHPNWDLUA is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1956
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,878
The corollary is that the one-time F buyer is probably buying exclusively on price and/or convenience. Whereas GS/1K are buying tickets on UA (lots of them!) even when it's not the cheapest or most convenient choice. That loyalty has tangible monetary value. Which is why UA chooses to reward it.
![Kacee is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1957
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UA 1K & 1MM/AA Gold & 1MM/HH Gold/Marriott Titanium
Posts: 2,933
1K on IAD-LAX on B739, I was seated in 1B.
Gate agent announced there were no GS passengers but still invited any to board if there were indeed any in the gate area.
FA took my order, then someone else's a few rows back, and then went front to back. ^
Gate agent announced there were no GS passengers but still invited any to board if there were indeed any in the gate area.
FA took my order, then someone else's a few rows back, and then went front to back. ^
![TWA Guy is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1958
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
I understand the level of defensiveness by many of the elites here, you want your loyalty to mean something to a company (when in reality I can guarantee you that it doesn't, US airlines have made that very clear for some time now) but the reality is this is a system used by zero other airlines in the world, and for good reason.
Now, AA does few things right nowadays, however the ability to pre-order meals (albeit, now very buggy) is something that should be rolled out throughout the industry IMO. This alleviates any need to really prioritize order taking at all and leaves everyone the option to select their first choice.
![cmd320 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1959
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,878
Not really. People are explaining what the rules are on UA and why they make sense in response to a personal opinion about the way things "should be" which has been presented as fact. You're entitled to your opinion, but that's all it is.
Did you really do that? $15K to fly UA? Seriously? Why would you not fly QF?
Did you really do that? $15K to fly UA? Seriously? Why would you not fly QF?
![Kacee is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1960
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Not really. People are explaining what the rules are on UA and why they make sense in response to a personal opinion about the way things "should be" which has been presented as fact. You're entitled to your opinion, but that's all it is.
Did you really do that? $15K to fly UA? Seriously? Why would you not fly QF?
Did you really do that? $15K to fly UA? Seriously? Why would you not fly QF?
It may be my opinion, but it says a lot that this is a procedure specific to UA.
![cmd320 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1961
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco
Programs: All-Around Kettle
Posts: 3,297
Didn't PMUA group 1K/GS and F fares at the top of the list? That would make sense to me: rewards 1K/GS for their loyalty, but not above and at the expense of someone who actually purchased First Class.
![nnn is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1962
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
That is absolutely acceptable. In terms of those who are flying on upgrades, top tier elites should certainly get their choice over lower tier elites, however those who have actually paid to sit in the F seat on that flight should have priority over anyone on an upgrade of any kind.
![cmd320 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1963
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
So, what if I spend $15,000 and fly SYD-LAX-IAH as a non-status. Are you saying that a 1k who barely hit the 12k minimum for the prior year should be prioritized ahead of me on the domestic segment simply because they flew on UA for 85,000 more miles in the last year while spending less than I did in one day?
.
.
![JVPhoto is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1964
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: UA-GS, Hyatt-Defiantly Diamond, Marriott-Platinum, SPG-Platinum
Posts: 499
So, what if I spend $15,000 and fly SYD-LAX-IAH as a non-status. Are you saying that a 1k who barely hit the 12k minimum for the prior year should be prioritized ahead of me on the domestic segment simply because they flew on UA for 85,000 more miles in the last year while spending less than I did in one day?
Ostensibly, you didn't spend that in the year before. If you had spent that $15k last year, you'd also be an elite and be getting your choice. The 1k in your highly unlikely scenario has been a longer-term loyal flier.
I understand the level of defensiveness by many of the non-elites here, but it is the policy. And really, it's an airline meal, so let's not take it so seriously.
![USHPNWDLUA is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#1965
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Yes.
Ostensibly, you didn't spend that in the year before. If you had spent that $15k last year, you'd also be an elite and be getting your choice. The 1k in your highly unlikely scenario has been a longer-term loyal flier.
I understand the level of defensiveness by many of the non-elites here, but it is the policy. And really, it's an airline meal, so let's not take it so seriously.
Ostensibly, you didn't spend that in the year before. If you had spent that $15k last year, you'd also be an elite and be getting your choice. The 1k in your highly unlikely scenario has been a longer-term loyal flier.
I understand the level of defensiveness by many of the non-elites here, but it is the policy. And really, it's an airline meal, so let's not take it so seriously.
![cmd320 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)