New iPhone is here!
#136
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,312
We don't carry dedicated music players or PDAs anymore either. It's all about convenience.
-David
#137
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Indianapolis
Programs: Hilton-Diamond Lifetime Platinum AA UA, WN-CP, SPG Gold.
Posts: 7,377
One of the most common types of pictures taken are those of friends and family at some gatherings -- if we ever have them again after the pandemic.
These are often taken in low light. Even nice DSLRs may require fast lenses, maybe even flash, to have these turn out well.
If Night Mode is good as advertised, it may be a good mix of portability and availability vs. a larger dedicated camera.
These are often taken in low light. Even nice DSLRs may require fast lenses, maybe even flash, to have these turn out well.
If Night Mode is good as advertised, it may be a good mix of portability and availability vs. a larger dedicated camera.
#138
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,107
Head over to head-fi.org to see the scene - a $1k player is not even top of the line
#139
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 4,871
Says who? At the mid-fi to hi-fi segments they are still very much a thing. This is probably the same as with photography - the masses are happy with streaming mp3 quality music to their earbuds same as they are happy with snapping selfies with their bowl of pasta
Head over to head-fi.org to see the scene - a $1k player is not even top of the line
Head over to head-fi.org to see the scene - a $1k player is not even top of the line
i was a longtime hold out as well, carrying a dedicated ipod (and other branded players) because i didnt trust the headphone output on phones was good enough. now they are. and storage is cheap. and bandwidth is high. i can stream music at 24b/96khz wirelessly to my phone and transmit it wirelessly to my headphone. and its good enough. the tech closed the quality gap and made it really liberating
#140
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 593
My personal opinion about high end HiFi enthusiasts is they listen to the device more than the music.
Many years ago in electronic sales it was a joke amongst the sales force about the all specs that were SO important to that crowd. Come on, how many were able to really hear the difference between an eight bit digital to analog converter compared to a ten bit?
It's the reason Monster Cable became so cherished with that group and still has some presence. The ad copy created a "Golden Ears" crowd. This myth was dispelled by Consumers Report who, oddly enough did not run ad$ from Monster seen in the HiFi magazines.
Isn't the best camera still the one you have with you?
Many years ago in electronic sales it was a joke amongst the sales force about the all specs that were SO important to that crowd. Come on, how many were able to really hear the difference between an eight bit digital to analog converter compared to a ten bit?
It's the reason Monster Cable became so cherished with that group and still has some presence. The ad copy created a "Golden Ears" crowd. This myth was dispelled by Consumers Report who, oddly enough did not run ad$ from Monster seen in the HiFi magazines.
Isn't the best camera still the one you have with you?
#141
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,107
As for the camera, you are spot on.
Still, when I know I'm out shooting, nothing I own beats my Nikon D7000 with a couple of fast primes, Even my walk around Sony M100m3 cannot keep up, even though it's one of the best pocketables.
#142
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
Posts: 31,216
12 Pro 256 Space Grey, first impressions:
-Liking the Space Grey
-Absolutely hate the shiny bling edge banding. It's not as bad on the Space Grey as on the other colors, but it's still awful. This will have to be put in a case or it will be badly scratched in short order, just like the piano black finish plastic with which automakers are so enamored. It's also a greasy fingerprint magnet and the shiny light-reflecting mirror finish just broadcasts each and every one. This IMO was a stupid decision. The phone would have looked just as premium with a matte finish like the 4/4s/5 had.
-The frosted glass back looks better than the high polish glass of the 11.
-The size seems like it's going to be OK. It can still be one-handed and isn't really that much bigger than my beloved 6s which, IMO, was the perfect size. But with the micro bezels, the increase in actual screen area between the 12 Pro and the 6/7/8/SE is huge.
-The OLED screen is bright and sharp. But I worry about screen burn. I don't buy Apple's claim that they have some special sauce that makes screen burn a non-issue. I think the only "special" thing they have is the very specific language in their warranty that says that they will not replace phones or screens because of screen burn.
-The phone does have a more "premium" feel over the X and 11.
-What does not feel premium however is the packaging. The box is tiny, because of course it only comes with a cable. No charging brick, no headphones, not booklet.
And about Apple's claim that they have done that for "environmental" reasons: It's complete BS. It's about being able to charge $20-$70 more [charging brick and headphones] without having to raise the price of the phone itself.
Apple says that they want to cut down on waste and that people already have one or more charging bricks from their old iphones, so no need to include one. That's complete crap as evidenced by the fact that the cable they include is Lightning-to-USB-C, but all of those millions of bricks out there are USB-A. So you still have to go out and buy another USB-C charging brick, which Apple, by pure coincidence I am sure, happens to sell - for an additional $20.
Yes, you can still use your old Lightning-to-USB-A cable if you do have an older USB-A charging brick, but this about Apple making more money by selling you accessories they used to include and saving shipping costs with the smaller packaging, it's not about "the environment".
-Liking the Space Grey
-Absolutely hate the shiny bling edge banding. It's not as bad on the Space Grey as on the other colors, but it's still awful. This will have to be put in a case or it will be badly scratched in short order, just like the piano black finish plastic with which automakers are so enamored. It's also a greasy fingerprint magnet and the shiny light-reflecting mirror finish just broadcasts each and every one. This IMO was a stupid decision. The phone would have looked just as premium with a matte finish like the 4/4s/5 had.
-The frosted glass back looks better than the high polish glass of the 11.
-The size seems like it's going to be OK. It can still be one-handed and isn't really that much bigger than my beloved 6s which, IMO, was the perfect size. But with the micro bezels, the increase in actual screen area between the 12 Pro and the 6/7/8/SE is huge.
-The OLED screen is bright and sharp. But I worry about screen burn. I don't buy Apple's claim that they have some special sauce that makes screen burn a non-issue. I think the only "special" thing they have is the very specific language in their warranty that says that they will not replace phones or screens because of screen burn.
-The phone does have a more "premium" feel over the X and 11.
-What does not feel premium however is the packaging. The box is tiny, because of course it only comes with a cable. No charging brick, no headphones, not booklet.
And about Apple's claim that they have done that for "environmental" reasons: It's complete BS. It's about being able to charge $20-$70 more [charging brick and headphones] without having to raise the price of the phone itself.
Apple says that they want to cut down on waste and that people already have one or more charging bricks from their old iphones, so no need to include one. That's complete crap as evidenced by the fact that the cable they include is Lightning-to-USB-C, but all of those millions of bricks out there are USB-A. So you still have to go out and buy another USB-C charging brick, which Apple, by pure coincidence I am sure, happens to sell - for an additional $20.
Yes, you can still use your old Lightning-to-USB-A cable if you do have an older USB-A charging brick, but this about Apple making more money by selling you accessories they used to include and saving shipping costs with the smaller packaging, it's not about "the environment".
Last edited by anrkitec; Oct 23, 2020 at 1:30 pm
#143
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
Posts: 31,216
Some more thoughts.
My first notched phone and I'm really hating the notch.
They should have just squared it off on the top. The few pixels they gain to the left and the right serve no functional purpose, and in fact make it impossible to show the battery meter and percentage simultaneously.
Also, Face ID just sucks. If the only new feature the 2013 iPhone 12s Pro or 13 Pro or whatever they call it, has is under glass Touch ID, I will get the new phone.
I also think that Apple's software has taken their 12MP sensor tech as far as it can go. The new software-based features are great, but the fundamental image quality at the pixel level isn't that much better than the iPhone 6/7/8/SE.
Using the phone's traditional ear speaker as a second speaker for music in order to simulate a stereo effect is interesting.
My first notched phone and I'm really hating the notch.
They should have just squared it off on the top. The few pixels they gain to the left and the right serve no functional purpose, and in fact make it impossible to show the battery meter and percentage simultaneously.
Also, Face ID just sucks. If the only new feature the 2013 iPhone 12s Pro or 13 Pro or whatever they call it, has is under glass Touch ID, I will get the new phone.
I also think that Apple's software has taken their 12MP sensor tech as far as it can go. The new software-based features are great, but the fundamental image quality at the pixel level isn't that much better than the iPhone 6/7/8/SE.
Using the phone's traditional ear speaker as a second speaker for music in order to simulate a stereo effect is interesting.
Last edited by anrkitec; Oct 24, 2020 at 1:37 am
#144
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,312
Says who? At the mid-fi to hi-fi segments they are still very much a thing. This is probably the same as with photography - the masses are happy with streaming mp3 quality music to their earbuds same as they are happy with snapping selfies with their bowl of pasta
Head over to head-fi.org to see the scene - a $1k player is not even top of the line
Head over to head-fi.org to see the scene - a $1k player is not even top of the line
-David
#145
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: No single airline or hotel chain is of much use to me anymore.
Posts: 3,279
-What does not feel premium however is the packaging. The box is tiny, because of course it only comes with a cable. No charging brick, no headphones, not booklet.
And about Apple's claim that they have done that for "environmental" reasons: It's complete BS. It's about being able to charge $20-$70 more [charging brick and headphones] without having to raise the price of the phone itself.
Apple says that they want to cut down on waste and that people already have one or more charging bricks from their old iphones, so no need to include one. That's complete crap as evidenced by the fact that the cable they include is Lightning-to-USB-C, but all of those millions of bricks out there are USB-A. So you still have to go out and buy another USB-C charging brick, which Apple, by pure coincidence I am sure, happens to sell - for an additional $20.
Yes, you can still use your old Lightning-to-USB-A cable if you do have an older USB-A charging brick, but this about Apple making more money by selling you accessories they used to include and saving shipping costs with the smaller packaging, it's not about "the environment".
And about Apple's claim that they have done that for "environmental" reasons: It's complete BS. It's about being able to charge $20-$70 more [charging brick and headphones] without having to raise the price of the phone itself.
Apple says that they want to cut down on waste and that people already have one or more charging bricks from their old iphones, so no need to include one. That's complete crap as evidenced by the fact that the cable they include is Lightning-to-USB-C, but all of those millions of bricks out there are USB-A. So you still have to go out and buy another USB-C charging brick, which Apple, by pure coincidence I am sure, happens to sell - for an additional $20.
Yes, you can still use your old Lightning-to-USB-A cable if you do have an older USB-A charging brick, but this about Apple making more money by selling you accessories they used to include and saving shipping costs with the smaller packaging, it's not about "the environment".
I don't think I have ever paid more than $30 for a pair of headphones in my life so I won't be buying airpods any time soon.
#146
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 593
There are two sorts - one using the gear to listen to he music, the other uses the music to listen to the gear...
As for the camera, you are spot on.
Still, when I know I'm out shooting, nothing I own beats my Nikon D7000 with a couple of fast primes, Even my walk around Sony M100m3 cannot keep up, even though it's one of the best pocketables.
As for the camera, you are spot on.
Still, when I know I'm out shooting, nothing I own beats my Nikon D7000 with a couple of fast primes, Even my walk around Sony M100m3 cannot keep up, even though it's one of the best pocketables.
#147
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,107
I paid €200 for the body* and €95 for the Nikkor 50/1,8. €150:ish for the Tokina 11-16/2,8. Of course I have my telephone with me, how else would I make phonecalls? (I also have a couple of others, sometimes one gets carried away in a camera shop)
This camera have served me well for many years, no need to waste money on new phones every year for better camera function - and IMO still runs circles around any phone camera.
* actually €150 as I got €50 store credit for my old D80
This camera have served me well for many years, no need to waste money on new phones every year for better camera function - and IMO still runs circles around any phone camera.
* actually €150 as I got €50 store credit for my old D80
#148
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 593
That's certainly a lot less that I would have guessed from what I've heard and seen listed.
Another reason iPhone upgrades are a thing for me is the resale of last years model is generally quite high. If I postpone my upgrade, that diminishes of course. My 11 Pro Max 256Gb should net me around $700 or so, and I get a Vet discount from Apple. My new 12 Pro Max 256Gb will cost $1079 & $12 for an Amazon case. I like the idea of having a fresh battery, and the latest hardware. It's one of my many vices. Also, I don't want to be the richest person in the graveyard!
Another reason iPhone upgrades are a thing for me is the resale of last years model is generally quite high. If I postpone my upgrade, that diminishes of course. My 11 Pro Max 256Gb should net me around $700 or so, and I get a Vet discount from Apple. My new 12 Pro Max 256Gb will cost $1079 & $12 for an Amazon case. I like the idea of having a fresh battery, and the latest hardware. It's one of my many vices. Also, I don't want to be the richest person in the graveyard!
#149
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,619
After around 8 years of being Android for both my tablet and phone, I'm contemplating switching to an iPhone 12 Pro Max (I've currently got a Samsung S20+).
I've used Samsung Tab S tablets for a long time, and they've generally been great. However, my S5e had a fingerprint sensor in the power button. This hardly ever worked, and was even worse when I had the official keyboard cover attached - as it obscured the button slightly. So, anytime I needed to authenticate, I'd end up having to type my password. The S6 had an underscreen fingerprint reader, but the S7 10 has gone back to the power button.
So... I bought an iPad Pro 10.5 to try it out. I knew I had the option of returning it if I didn't get on with it. It took me a day to realise it was great - and it wasn't going anywhere The Face Id is great - especially when linked to BitWarden. No entering passwords ever again.
The thing that made me move from iOS originally was the lack of customisation (without Jailbreaking). However, it appears that there's not much you can't do these days - is Jailbreaking still a thing? iOS 14 seems to have stolen the Android concept of an Apps Drawer - so you can customise you home screen and remove rarely used apps. The 'notch' is still a bit messy - but I guess that's needed for Face Id?
Anyway, I'll order one when they become available in the UK
I've used Samsung Tab S tablets for a long time, and they've generally been great. However, my S5e had a fingerprint sensor in the power button. This hardly ever worked, and was even worse when I had the official keyboard cover attached - as it obscured the button slightly. So, anytime I needed to authenticate, I'd end up having to type my password. The S6 had an underscreen fingerprint reader, but the S7 10 has gone back to the power button.
So... I bought an iPad Pro 10.5 to try it out. I knew I had the option of returning it if I didn't get on with it. It took me a day to realise it was great - and it wasn't going anywhere The Face Id is great - especially when linked to BitWarden. No entering passwords ever again.
The thing that made me move from iOS originally was the lack of customisation (without Jailbreaking). However, it appears that there's not much you can't do these days - is Jailbreaking still a thing? iOS 14 seems to have stolen the Android concept of an Apps Drawer - so you can customise you home screen and remove rarely used apps. The 'notch' is still a bit messy - but I guess that's needed for Face Id?
Anyway, I'll order one when they become available in the UK
#150
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 593
Jailbreaking is alive and well. You can catch up on it at a website called iclarified.com. I had jailbroken every one of my iPhones since the 3G, but Apple adopted many of the things Jailbreaking permitted, and Apple really worked at preventing it. That made sense, since it was a flaw in the OS that a Jailbreak exploited. I haven't had a Jailbroken device since my iPad Mini 4. The only Jailbreak feature I miss is running an app called PDANet that allowed for a pass trough WiFi function. You could log on to a WiFi provider then create your own WiFi hotspot from that. Useful for paid, single device service like cruise ships and some hotels, etc. Technically theft I suppose.