Last edit by: CWAL
A new thread was created for the new year in 2017. This is the old thread. For the 2017 on this topic, go here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/manufactured-spending/1819562-cvs-master-thread-2017-a.html
CVS is cash only for all Incomm-related reloads and reloadable cards, including Vanilla Reloads and Serve swipe reloads. See memo to stores for complete list. Other cards at CVS can still be bought using credit, but YMMV depending on location, Manager, etc.
New limits rolling out starting 10/20:
Transactions with $300 or more of card face value require ID.
Limit $2000 of card face value per 24 hour rolling period.
Limit of 10 cards per 24 hours.
Cashback posted in 48 hours.
Cash Register Freezing
Multiple reports that the CVS cash register will freeze and lock after scanning the ID when purchasing multiple prepaid cards. Then the register's computer needs to be restarted. Some report that "swiping" the ID instead of "scanning" will avoid the issue.
Limit of 7 tenders (swipes) per transaction. This is most commonly run into when using low-value AGCs. After seven, the transaction must be complete, no cash (or any other payment method) will be accepted to pay the balance.
CVS is cash only for all Incomm-related reloads and reloadable cards, including Vanilla Reloads and Serve swipe reloads. See memo to stores for complete list. Other cards at CVS can still be bought using credit, but YMMV depending on location, Manager, etc.
New limits rolling out starting 10/20:
Transactions with $300 or more of card face value require ID.
Limit $2000 of card face value per 24 hour rolling period.
Limit of 10 cards per 24 hours.
Cashback posted in 48 hours.
Cash Register Freezing
Multiple reports that the CVS cash register will freeze and lock after scanning the ID when purchasing multiple prepaid cards. Then the register's computer needs to be restarted. Some report that "swiping" the ID instead of "scanning" will avoid the issue.
Limit of 7 tenders (swipes) per transaction. This is most commonly run into when using low-value AGCs. After seven, the transaction must be complete, no cash (or any other payment method) will be accepted to pay the balance.
CVS master thread(2013-2016)
#1381
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ORD
Posts: 220
I wonder what cc everyone is using to buy beans at CVS. Is some card out there to earn more than 1x at pharmacy stores?
#1382
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: RDU
Programs: A few
Posts: 5,499
Some in the industry have reported (not just on FT) how slim the profit margin is on selling prepaid reloads and it being wiped out by a CC interchange fee paid on say a $500 VR. But lets optimistically assume CVS is compensated $10+ for every $500 VR and their interchange fee is under 2%. If that is the case, then InComm or the prepaid business must be losing the money because we all know $10 in fees per $500 is not collected on the transaction when a churner unloads it. And I wouldn't be surprised if at least 90 out of 100 VR dollars in the country are being churned. I ask the cashiers and there is an occasional 'underbanked' buyer paying some cash for a reload while 20x$500 get cleared from the shelves. I don't see how someone in the business isn't losing money, I doubt it is the party that depends entirely on that activity to make a profit, but I could see a store taking a small loss to allow CC for convenience if it gets you in to buy other high profit items in the store.
i am first to admit that i do not know who wins and loses in this game. it's a well guarded secret. but i am certainly not going to start making crap up and posting it as "fairly well established" fact the way you do.
#1383
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: RDU
Programs: A few
Posts: 5,499
if we want to get into the pure speculation about who wins or loses though the question of which card is used i think is quite telling. i found it telling that when officedepot sold vr's it got shutdown and that is because everybody was using the same chase cards. the entire spend was concentrated in one issuer and their ink series of cards. one issuer was definitely losing out as they were paying 5x on all the spend. i have seen hints from bloggers who are high up the food chain with chase that the pressure on office depot came from chase. now at cvs with the spend spread out over several different issuers and product lines, and most of those only paying 1x or 2x, the issuers are not likely getting burned as badly as chase was. and lo and behold rather than shut it down, cvs actually turn the taps up. coincidence? absolutely possible
the other area where we know shutdowns occur are with the card providers. we all know of the netspend, mio and mvd shutdowns. in fact the only one that doesn't get shutdown is bluebird, run by the giant amex who can afford to subsidize the loss in much the same way amazon payments seems to be willing to subsidize a loss up to a certain monthly limit (thank goodness amex let us do $5k instead of the more miserly $1k). now i am getting much more speculative but kind of suggests that the card providers are actually losing money. but if you load the card and then unload it, if they are getting 100 cents on the dollar in theory it should just be neutral for them. so why shutdown? it is of course quite possible they don't get 100 cents on the dollar. maybe they get 90 or 95 or 98. and they have to pay out 100 when you unload. so if you do too much without them getting all the other big offsetting fees they thought they'd get, they shut you down. if we were revenue neutral to them i don't think we'd see swiping shutdowns. but we do, and that suggests to me we are costing them $$$s
so in my opinion -not established fact by any means - the losers are the card issuers paying high multipliers on spend and the prepaid debit card issuers who i think are getting less than face value. and i suspect the stores are making a profit or at least breaking even
#1385
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 192
It has been fairly well established the CVS store is losing money on each VR CC transaction. Store managers have complained to people about P&L reports, etc. A sensible business decision would be to scan DL to mitigate risk but keep limit to $1k/day, as any legit prepaid user would not need more than that. But why would corporate sanction an increase to $5k/day, only multiplying store losses for the benefit of churners?) I am going to stay a bit paranoid until someone can explain the business case behind it...
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=C...rce=undefined;
For the past year, from the mid 40s to high 50s/low 60s...their stock is doing A OKAY.
Maybe the VR sales is adding to the "revenue" in a huge way...
#1386
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 939
Ummm....okay, but take a look at this chart and see if CVS is REALLY losing money...
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=C...rce=undefined;
For the past year, from the mid 40s to high 50s/low 60s...their stock is doing A OKAY.
Maybe the VR sales is adding to the "revenue" in a huge way...
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=C...rce=undefined;
For the past year, from the mid 40s to high 50s/low 60s...their stock is doing A OKAY.
Maybe the VR sales is adding to the "revenue" in a huge way...
#1387
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,153
Ummm....okay, but take a look at this chart and see if CVS is REALLY losing money...
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=C...rce=undefined;
For the past year, from the mid 40s to high 50s/low 60s...their stock is doing A OKAY.
Maybe the VR sales is adding to the "revenue" in a huge way...
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=C...rce=undefined;
For the past year, from the mid 40s to high 50s/low 60s...their stock is doing A OKAY.
Maybe the VR sales is adding to the "revenue" in a huge way...
#1388
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
ok it's the famous people of "some" (who presumable live "somewhere") followed by a bunch of "suppose", "if" and "doubt". in other words utter speculation
i am first to admit that i do not know who wins and loses in this game. it's a well guarded secret. but i am certainly not going to start making crap up and posting it as "fairly well established" fact the way you do.
i am first to admit that i do not know who wins and loses in this game. it's a well guarded secret. but i am certainly not going to start making crap up and posting it as "fairly well established" fact the way you do.
#1389
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
Ammm...to conclude "if CVS is REALLY losing money..." stock value is technically not what you want to look. Yes, it should reflect the "earning", but looking @ the earning itself is better to conclude that. However, it's really difficult to tell the "margin" of PrePaids/Reloads from the overall picture.
#1390
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Posts: 14,162
Even if CVS lost a couple bucks per VR (paid with CC), maybe the churner buys other overpriced items while he's in there or better yet transfers prescriptions over for added convenience. Maybe in the end selling VRs to that person causes a net profit. I just can't believe that happens very much in reality.
#1391
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
I could be wrong but I believe if a person tried doing that on a new CC or 1 that they havent been using heavy till now, they just might be shut down.Especially with Citi
#1392
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,153
It's somehow working for CVS unlike the OD. If not, they would disappear from shelves or put constraint of Cash-Only. I don't know why they don't get the CC frauds as the OD (believed reason for not letting people buy variables of any kind with CCs) did...
#1393
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 192
Well basically, stock price DOES matter.
A company's stock is driven by earnings and profitability, mostly...
Yes, it's one of 10,000 items they stock, but it's one of the HIGHER value commodity compared to the other 10,000 items...Sure there are other medicines that cost just as much, but I'm sure they are kept to small percentage.
My idea is that if the company sees that one of their higher price item is not turning a profit, and for them to increase the saleability from their usual $1k limit to $5k limit, it doesn't make sense...to the board of directors, to their shareholders, etc...unless someone up high just wants to "inflate" earnings...
Well, it was just for a fun speculation...but I'm SURE they make money somehow.
A company's stock is driven by earnings and profitability, mostly...
Yes, it's one of 10,000 items they stock, but it's one of the HIGHER value commodity compared to the other 10,000 items...Sure there are other medicines that cost just as much, but I'm sure they are kept to small percentage.
My idea is that if the company sees that one of their higher price item is not turning a profit, and for them to increase the saleability from their usual $1k limit to $5k limit, it doesn't make sense...to the board of directors, to their shareholders, etc...unless someone up high just wants to "inflate" earnings...
Well, it was just for a fun speculation...but I'm SURE they make money somehow.
#1394
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Im being to think if you arent accepted for a job at Wallys that Charlie will hire you. Man can these folks dream up some lines out of thin air that has no substance to it whatsoever
btw I simply drove 4 mins on the same street to another store to get what I wanted anyway, while there picked up what is my 3rd although I only wanted 2 to begin with