FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Manufactured Spending (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/manufactured-spending-719/)
-   -   CVS master thread(2013-2016) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/manufactured-spending/1449551-cvs-master-thread-2013-2016-a.html)

ashap Mar 29, 2014 7:05 pm


Originally Posted by arsenalman (Post 22612514)


I just saw the same memo in Boston - talked to the Manager and he said i should be ok with VRs. Hopefully he is right!

He is WRONG. VR is very clearly listed as a cash only product on the memo.

Luvs2Sav12 Mar 29, 2014 7:13 pm

But the VR is not a reloadable product. You cannot reload the VR card itself. The memo may be talking about only cards that can be swiped and reloaded.

When the memo mentions vanilla reload network, maybe it is talking about cards that can be reloaded with in the vanilla reload network.

This may be wishful thinking but hopefully correct.

arlflyer Mar 29, 2014 7:17 pm


Originally Posted by ashap (Post 22612678)
He is WRONG. VR is very clearly listed as a cash only product on the memo.

If it is so cut and dried, then why does googling "My Vanilla Reload" (verbatim off the memo) yield only hits of people talking in the first person possessive about "vanilla reload(s), and nothing representing a product thusly named?

Point being the memo is ambiguously worded.

silver6054 Mar 29, 2014 7:17 pm


Originally Posted by Luvs2Sav12 (Post 22612705)
But the VR is not a reloadable product. You cannot reload the VR card itself. The memo may be talking about only cards that can be swiped and reloaded.

When the memo mentions vanilla reload network, maybe it is talking about cards that can be reloaded with in the vanilla reload network.

This may be wishful thinking but hopefully correct.

But isn't the Paypal $20-$500 card basically the same type of thing as VR in that it cannot be reloaded itself. And that is on the list.

Red259 Mar 29, 2014 7:20 pm


Originally Posted by arlflyer (Post 22612719)
If it is so cut and dried, then why does googling "My Vanilla Reload" (verbatim off the memo) yield only hits of people talking in the first person possessive about "vanilla reload(s), and nothing representing a product thusly named?

Point being the memo is ambiguously worded.

No idea what you are talking about. The memo also specifically lists "Vanilla Reload Network". This is the name on the product. I don't see anything ambiguous about it.

PaulMSN Mar 29, 2014 7:21 pm


Originally Posted by ashap (Post 22612678)
He is WRONG. VR is very clearly listed as a cash only product on the memo.

Making an absolute proclamation doesn't make you right. The memo is cut off, but it appears to say this:

"Overview: A change is being implemented for all Reloadable Cards. As of 3/31, the acceptable form of payment for all Reloadable Debit Cards will be cash only. All Green Dot cards are already..."

Since a VR is a loading instrument, not a reloadable debit card, there is room for this to be a misinterpretation by the creator of the memo.

The actual name on a VR is "Prepaid Reload" -- "Vanilla Reload Network" is a descriptor -- so there may be some confusion on the part of the creator. We'll see on the 31st, but maybe only regionally.

ashap Mar 29, 2014 7:23 pm


Originally Posted by arlflyer (Post 22612719)
Quote: Originally Posted by ashap

He is WRONG. VR is very clearly listed as a cash only product on the memo.

If it is so cut and dried, then why does googling "My Vanilla Reload" (verbatim off the memo) yield only hits of people talking in the first person possessive about "vanilla reload(s), and nothing representing a product thusly named?

Point being the memo is ambiguously worded.

Because googling it means nothing. What means something is the very specific item number for VR, specifically assigned by CVS, and as of Monday, specifically hard coded to allow only cash purchases.

Nothing ambiguous about that.

jiffyjiff Mar 29, 2014 7:25 pm

speculation and arguing interpretations are such a waste of time.

ashap Mar 29, 2014 7:25 pm


Originally Posted by PaulMSN (Post 22612733)
. Quote: Originally Posted by ashap

He is WRONG. VR is very clearly listed as a cash only product on the memo.

Making an absolute proclamation doesn't make you right. The memo is cut off, but it appears to say this:

"Overview: A change is being implemented for all Reloadable Cards. As of 3/31, the acceptable form of payment for all Reloadable Debit Cards will be cash only. All Green Dot cards are already..."

Since a VR is a loading instrument, not a reloadable debit card, there is room for this to be a misinterpretation by the creator of the memo.

The actual name on a VR is "Prepaid Reload" -- "Vanilla Reload Network" is a descriptor -- so there may be some confusion on the part of the creator. We'll see on the 31st, but maybe only regionally.

Some of us were given permission to actually read the memo. So yes I know exactly what it said.

Also there is, once again, no confusion on the part of anyone where it comes to item numbers.

toxicity Mar 29, 2014 7:28 pm


Originally Posted by ashap (Post 22612746)
Some of us were given permission to actually read the memo. So yes I know exactly what it said.

Also there is, once again, no confusion on the part of anyone where it comes to item numbers.

So you matched the item # on the rack for VR's to the item # listed in the memo?

susieling Mar 29, 2014 7:29 pm

what a bad luck -- just applied for the wellsfargo 5% cash card and the card is still on the road... now what I could do after I receive it :rolleyes: anywhere else to take advantage of it?

whitesol Mar 29, 2014 7:30 pm


Originally Posted by toxicity (Post 22612754)
So you matched the item # on the rack for VR's to the item # listed in the memo?

I have matched the numbers and it is VRs, there are stickers which list the item numbers and a photo when they are OOS.

arsenalman Mar 29, 2014 7:32 pm


Originally Posted by ashap (Post 22612678)
He is WRONG. VR is very clearly listed as a cash only product on the memo.

While i agree that he is potentially wrong, his interpretation was that because the VR we purchase isnt the one that we have in possession, it could be one of the other Vanilla products that is stated in the memo. Thats all! No need to get all upset - we all are getting affected.

arlflyer Mar 29, 2014 7:32 pm


Originally Posted by toxicity (Post 22612754)
So you matched the item # on the rack for VR's to the item # listed in the memo?

Forgive my previous misreading post, but...yes I just walked down to the store. SKU 904509 is ice cream. If the memo is nationwide and legit then the goose is cooked.

PaulMSN Mar 29, 2014 7:32 pm


Originally Posted by ashap (Post 22612746)
Some of us were given permission to actually read the memo. So yes I know exactly what it said.

Also there is, once again, no confusion on the part of anyone where it comes to item numbers.

There may be confusion on the part of the memo writer, because the overview and the list do not match entirely. As I said, we'll see. I'm looking at intent as stated in the overview, you're looking at the list and saying it's inerrant.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:38 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.