Last edit by: FlyinHawaiian
HA's official web page on the lie flats
24 aircraft converted: N360HA, N361HA, N370HA, N373HA, N374HA, N375HA, N378HA, N379HA, N380HA, N381HA, N382HA, N383HA, N384HA, N385HA, N386HA, N388HA, N389HA, N390HA, N391HA, N392HA, N393HA, N395HA, N396HA, N399HA
24 aircraft converted: N360HA, N361HA, N370HA, N373HA, N374HA, N375HA, N378HA, N379HA, N380HA, N381HA, N382HA, N383HA, N384HA, N385HA, N386HA, N388HA, N389HA, N390HA, N391HA, N392HA, N393HA, N395HA, N396HA, N399HA
Consolidated "Hawaiian Airlines A330" thread
#211
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: Enough to travel better
Posts: 2,020
So, as an alternative, do you want to try UA from EWR-HNL on a 767-300ER instead? You can compare these seats on HA with UA's Barkeloungers in F...
#212
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mountain Time Zone
Programs: AS Million Miler/Marriott Lifetime Titanium/ IGH Ambassador
Posts: 5,992
Hey it's only an opinion and nothing personal
#213
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
#214
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: Enough to travel better
Posts: 2,020
All is forgiven edgewood49! No worries.
Hopefully, HA will invest in different F seating, but it seems to me, only if their competition is providing improvements. So far, not many carriers to HNL provide the F "lie-flat seats" that many FTers boast about.
Hopefully, HA will invest in different F seating, but it seems to me, only if their competition is providing improvements. So far, not many carriers to HNL provide the F "lie-flat seats" that many FTers boast about.
#215
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mountain Time Zone
Programs: AS Million Miler/Marriott Lifetime Titanium/ IGH Ambassador
Posts: 5,992
that I will agree with as the flight from the east coast is long.
#216
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 26
N389HA, Keali'iokonaikalewa, delivered today, June 20, Toulouse to Los Angeles. This makes the fourth and final A330 put into service this year.
#217
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney AUS
Programs: VA Gold, United Premier Gold, Qantas Platinum
Posts: 349
#218
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 26
Oh well, good for San Diego. Just hope that flight 1 actually gets to Honolulu before flight 3 when we go.
I suppose this is only relevant to folks who fly LAX-HNL.
So, I was waiting for this to happen. Today, 6/23, Flight 1 is seriously delayed (over 4 hours), waiting for Flight 4 to arrive. Flight 1 was scheduled to leave at 8:40 am, but, as I write this, is tentatively scheduled to leave at 12:45 pm. This seems optimistic as Flight 4 reached the gate at 11:36 am. A 1 hour turn around is awful quick.
Meanwhile, Flight 3 to HNL went out on schedule at approx. 10:40 and should arrive in HNL on time.
Last year, when flights 3 and 4 were added for the summer, 1, 2, 3, and 4 were all designated as A330 flights. Flight 2 arrives every evening around 10:30 pm. Typically, Flight 4 would turn to become Flight 1 each morning with about a 2 hour turnover. Not that unusual for most other flights throughout the system. Flight 2 of the previous night would have a 12 hour layover and depart as Flight 3 the next day. However, in the event of a Flight 4 delay, they would often swap identically configured aircraft (A330s) and send ex-Flight 2 out as Flight 1. Often this swap would be enough to keep both Flights 1 and 3 on time, or at least minimize a delay for one of the flights (i.e., Flight 3).
However now, since Flights 4 and 1 have been designated as 767s, we have a situation with 2 flights scheduled LAX-HNL 2 hours apart, with a much greater probability of delay for the earlier flight, since there is only a 2 hour turnaround for the Flight 1 aircraft, whereas there's a 12 hour turnaround for the Flight 3 aircraft. Evidently its not as easy to swap aircraft between Flights 1 and 3 because of the different seating configurations.
Bottom line: HAL has a high on time arrival record. And, most flights operate with only a 2-3 hour turnaround, and do just fine. Still, it seems that there's less risk of a delay if you book Flight 3 instead of Flight 1.
Just to add one more unique factor to today's situation: Yesterday N389HA joined the fleet as evening Flight 9 to HNL, leaving the inbound Flight 10 aircraft, 386, behind. This morning 386 left LAX as Flight 8001 to HNL (I assume deadheading) in order to position one more A330 at the hub to begin servicing San Diego today. I wonder if the folks stuck in LAX knew that this plane left LAX while they've been stuck in the airport for an extra 4 or 5 hours.
Maybe HAL tried to accommodate some Flight 1 folks on Flight 3, or even route them through Maui on Flight 33 (new 767 service which also went off on time), but considering summer passenger loads I doubt there were very many seats available.
I suppose this is only relevant to folks who fly LAX-HNL.
So, I was waiting for this to happen. Today, 6/23, Flight 1 is seriously delayed (over 4 hours), waiting for Flight 4 to arrive. Flight 1 was scheduled to leave at 8:40 am, but, as I write this, is tentatively scheduled to leave at 12:45 pm. This seems optimistic as Flight 4 reached the gate at 11:36 am. A 1 hour turn around is awful quick.
Meanwhile, Flight 3 to HNL went out on schedule at approx. 10:40 and should arrive in HNL on time.
Last year, when flights 3 and 4 were added for the summer, 1, 2, 3, and 4 were all designated as A330 flights. Flight 2 arrives every evening around 10:30 pm. Typically, Flight 4 would turn to become Flight 1 each morning with about a 2 hour turnover. Not that unusual for most other flights throughout the system. Flight 2 of the previous night would have a 12 hour layover and depart as Flight 3 the next day. However, in the event of a Flight 4 delay, they would often swap identically configured aircraft (A330s) and send ex-Flight 2 out as Flight 1. Often this swap would be enough to keep both Flights 1 and 3 on time, or at least minimize a delay for one of the flights (i.e., Flight 3).
However now, since Flights 4 and 1 have been designated as 767s, we have a situation with 2 flights scheduled LAX-HNL 2 hours apart, with a much greater probability of delay for the earlier flight, since there is only a 2 hour turnaround for the Flight 1 aircraft, whereas there's a 12 hour turnaround for the Flight 3 aircraft. Evidently its not as easy to swap aircraft between Flights 1 and 3 because of the different seating configurations.
Bottom line: HAL has a high on time arrival record. And, most flights operate with only a 2-3 hour turnaround, and do just fine. Still, it seems that there's less risk of a delay if you book Flight 3 instead of Flight 1.
Just to add one more unique factor to today's situation: Yesterday N389HA joined the fleet as evening Flight 9 to HNL, leaving the inbound Flight 10 aircraft, 386, behind. This morning 386 left LAX as Flight 8001 to HNL (I assume deadheading) in order to position one more A330 at the hub to begin servicing San Diego today. I wonder if the folks stuck in LAX knew that this plane left LAX while they've been stuck in the airport for an extra 4 or 5 hours.
Maybe HAL tried to accommodate some Flight 1 folks on Flight 3, or even route them through Maui on Flight 33 (new 767 service which also went off on time), but considering summer passenger loads I doubt there were very many seats available.
Last edited by Hokulea; Jun 23, 2012 at 2:32 pm Reason: Updated information:
#219
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 26
Flight 1 left the gate at 1:16 pm and is estimated to arrive at HNL at 4:07 pm, almost 5 hours late. Flight 3 is estimated to arrive at 1:24 pm.
#220
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SAN
Programs: SPG UA WN HA
Posts: 44
We were on flight 16 HNL-SAN on June 30. I was seated in 12J which would have been a great seat except I couldn't seem to get the seat to recline and lock into place. I wasn't trying to fully recline, just push it back a little. The seat *would* recline, but then would spring back. I couldn't figure out if it was broken or if the guy behind me was pushing it back. After awhile, I just gave up and sat straight upright for the entire flight which was less than optimal. Was it me (failing at getting a seat to recline - am I that lame?) or was the seat truly broken? Or maybe the guy behind me wasn't very nice? I talked to him about it and he seemed ok but I still think that it was odd that a seat on a new plane wouldn't work.
And I guess since this was a new plane on that route it would explain the reason that the pilot slammed on the brakes after we landed and took the plane to the very end of the runway - right up to the red lights. That was exciting.
And I guess since this was a new plane on that route it would explain the reason that the pilot slammed on the brakes after we landed and took the plane to the very end of the runway - right up to the red lights. That was exciting.
#221
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 26
We were on flight 16 HNL-SAN on June 30. I was seated in 12J which would have been a great seat except I couldn't seem to get the seat to recline and lock into place. I wasn't trying to fully recline, just push it back a little. The seat *would* recline, but then would spring back. I couldn't figure out if it was broken or if the guy behind me was pushing it back. After awhile, I just gave up and sat straight upright for the entire flight which was less than optimal. Was it me (failing at getting a seat to recline - am I that lame?) or was the seat truly broken? Or maybe the guy behind me wasn't very nice? I talked to him about it and he seemed ok but I still think that it was odd that a seat on a new plane wouldn't work.
And I guess since this was a new plane on that route it would explain the reason that the pilot slammed on the brakes after we landed and took the plane to the very end of the runway - right up to the red lights. That was exciting.
And I guess since this was a new plane on that route it would explain the reason that the pilot slammed on the brakes after we landed and took the plane to the very end of the runway - right up to the red lights. That was exciting.
As for San Diego, it's always a thrill landing in San Diego, isn't it?
Change of subject: regarding my previous LA-HNL message. Flight 1 had another 5 hour + delay on 6/27. Also, the new LA to Maui flight, 33, also a 767, had a massive time delay the other day. Does anyone know if this is typical of the HAL 767 fleet, or were these just flukes? I really don't want to spend $300 just to switch from a 9:00 am to 10:30 am flight.
#222
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
Uh no, that's pretty much par for the course in SAN! They should have moved that airport years ago.
#223
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mountain Time Zone
Programs: AS Million Miler/Marriott Lifetime Titanium/ IGH Ambassador
Posts: 5,992
Should not have had to "calm on the brakes"
#224
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,576
Hokulea -
Mx issues happen at every airline on planes new and old. I wouldn't spend $$$ to change flights, purely based on equipment because 2 flights had delays. The 330 is not immune to mx issues. Just go with it and enjoy your flight.
Mx issues happen at every airline on planes new and old. I wouldn't spend $$$ to change flights, purely based on equipment because 2 flights had delays. The 330 is not immune to mx issues. Just go with it and enjoy your flight.
#225
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 9
Does anyone knoW if row 13 is good. Wife and I are booked in row 13 on HA51 from JFK-HNL and I have seen differing seating charts between HA, seat guru and seat expert. I want to make sure it's not limited recline / bad seat choice given the length of th flight