Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

Pre-ordering Meals on Delta, the Definitive Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 24, 2019, 9:23 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: michab
The following website seems to allow you to preview the menu options ahead of time: http://cloud.o.delta.com/fltInfo

The Delta App lets you pre-select meals 7 days prior to departure. You may or may not receive an email around the same time (it's inconsistent whether you even receive an email). On the "MY TRIPS" tab, any eligible trip in the list will have a SELECT YOUR ENTREE button; this also appears if you tap on a trip and are viewing the individual trip details. The app is able to handle selections for multiple passengers traveling on the same record (i.e. you will be able to make selections on behalf of traveling companions)

Sample screenshot:



PRE-COVID: If you don't get the email, or only one of multiple passengers receives the email*, you can ask a phone or Twitter/FB agent for the choices, and they can make your selection up until T-24h (not all agents are sharp about this, so you may need to explain that you want to pre-order a regular meal, *not* one of the special vegetarian/Kosher meals etc. HUCA as needed) Nowadays it is unclear if agents can even still do this (or if just the average phone/chat agent does not know how to do so anymore)

*If this happens, double check that you have an email address (for each passenger) in the reservation. (But this can happen at random anyway even if you do have an email address listed.)

Print Wikipost

Pre-ordering Meals on Delta, the Definitive Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2016, 7:30 pm
  #196  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by Bicostal
OK - and so what? The probability that everyone gets their meal choice is about 25% in the 10 passenger case and 31% in the 6 passenger case. What do you think you have proved?

Certainly not that as the number of passengers goes up the probability of a passenger being disappointed goes down.
Who cares about the probability that everyone gets their meal choice? The question is the expected number of people who don't.

Again with the "you take 10 flights and i'll take 2" scenario.
Same total number of passengers. That's what matters; out of 100 passengers, how many don't get their meal choices?

You said that if I get on a plane with 20 FC seats and no one has preordered a meal, I stand a better chance of getting what I want than if I get on that same plane where 10 people (but not me) have preordered a meal. I called BS.

Here's why, I fully agree, that the number of unhappy passengers is different, but so is the denominator. More people, more unhappy people.
But it's not a linear relationship, it's closer to a square root. Why are you unwilling to understand that?

Second, there are more than 2 states of nature - the all happy or all unhappy states. There are states where one passenger is unhappy, there are probabilities of 2, or 3, or 4 being unhapp - all the way to 5 being unhappy in the 10 passenger case. The probability of each of these states is different - but each contribute to the cummulative probability of me being unhappy. I don't know which plane I am getting on, but I could be on that plane where there is a 7/3 distribution of preference meaning that 2 people will be unhappy - or 20%. The chance of being on a 7/3 plane is lower (12%) than say a 6/4 plane (20%), but the number of chances of being unhappy (2 instead of 1) is higher.
That's not the correct sort of calculation to find the number of unhappy people.

Note - I did NOT change the number of passengers on a flight, just the number of times I do the experiment.

Now do the math - cacluclate the cummulative probability and if you think that you are still better off with more passengers not pre-selecting, then you feel free to think that.
If there are 2 passengers or 20 passengers not pre-selecting, and I choose last, there's a 50% chance I'm disappointed. If I choose first (or anywhere in the first 10 for the 20-pax case) there's a 0% chance I'm disappointed. If I choose between position #11 and #19 (inclusive) in the 20-pax case, there's a probability strictly between 0% and 50% that I'm disappointed.

So: in the 2 pax case, there's a 25% chance I'm disappointed (50% that I choose last, 50% that the other person wants the same meal).

In the 20 pax case, there's a 50% chance that I choose in the second half; and, given that, the chance that I'm disappointed is well under 50% (depending on just where in the second half I am). So my overall chance of being disappointed is under 25%, and I'm better off.
sethb is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2016, 7:32 pm
  #197  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by DL2SXM
I don't see whats so terrible about shelling out a few bucks via the Trip Extra's section on the delta website to upgrade your meal experience. Delta wouldn't be forcing you to buy into a better meal deal. Its very simple. Buy an F seat, get a decent meal. Buy a coach seat and wind up in F then you get whatever garbage is loaded on the food cart or use the Trip Extra's section to buy up your meal experience. I like the idea and on a route like JFK-SEA for which I can buy a sLUT fare for $300.00, I would most likely easily spend a few more dollars for an enhanced meal service.
And once again, we see you proposing that Delta either commit False Advertising (the upgrade isn't to First Class but to something with some of the benefits of First Class, but not all of them) or have to change its advertising to admit it doesn't really provide First Class upgrades.

I don't think either of those will fly.
sethb is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2016, 7:34 pm
  #198  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by DiverDave
So I just booked a FC ticket HSV-LAX in May. On my Westbound leg to LAX, do I sit in the front or back of the cabin to get my choice?
What's the flight number?

And a surcharge for using the FC toilet,
I suggested that a couple of years ago, but only for coach pax (and as a method to get them to actually not use the F lav).
sethb is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2016, 7:40 pm
  #199  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 5,292
Originally Posted by sethb
And once again, we see you proposing that Delta either commit False Advertising (the upgrade isn't to First Class but to something with some of the benefits of First Class, but not all of them) or have to change its advertising to admit it doesn't really provide First Class upgrades.

I don't think either of those will fly.
Boy you are quite focused on advertising. From someone who makes his living off of advertising, I can tell you most of it comes with conditions and disclaimers. Hardly any can be taken at face value.
bubbashow is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2016, 8:29 pm
  #200  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Huntsville, AL
Programs: DL DM 1.929MM, Hilton Lifetime Diamond, IHG Platinum, Avis CHM, Marriott Titanium (lifetime gold)
Posts: 7,860
Originally Posted by sethb
What's the flight number?
1455.
DiverDave is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2016, 8:35 pm
  #201  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 6,712
Originally Posted by sethb
I suggested that a couple of years ago, but only for coach pax (and as a method to get them to actually not use the F lav).
Or if FAs would just close the curtain on all flights, as opposed to just long-hauls.
KDCAflyer is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2016, 10:55 pm
  #202  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: OMA / MUC
Programs: Former NW PE, now DL DM
Posts: 1,006
Originally Posted by bubbashow
Boy you are quite focused on advertising. From someone who makes his living off of advertising, I can tell you most of it comes with conditions and disclaimers. Hardly any can be taken at face value.
OK, Bubbashow, if the advertising you sell comes with all of these conditions and disclaimers, then WHY would anyone buy it???

Likewise, either DL offers and advertises a product for sale and then provides it "as advertised" when purchased by a passenger, or they just stay completely out of the "add-on market" because they can't/won't provide what the traveler wants to pay for. If there are a lot of conditions/disclaimers regarding a PAID upgrade to a premium cabin then who would even consider this offer?
mrcimino1 is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 4:31 am
  #203  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 5,292
Originally Posted by mrcimino1
OK, Bubbashow, if the advertising you sell comes with all of these conditions and disclaimers, then WHY would anyone buy it???
Because people choose not to see details. Sure you can lease a Chevy Cruze for 89 a month (see dealer for details). The details are the devil. 2000 down, 10k miles per year, plus tax title doc and transfer fees, by the way you must have GM employee pricing and a conquest lease.

So can you get a car for 89 a month? Sure. People come into the dealer for the 89 price. They ignore the details. False advertising? Not even close.
bubbashow is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 6:24 am
  #204  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: MIA
Programs: AA EXP (AC), DL G (SC), Bonvoy LTP, & IHG AMB
Posts: 1,798
Originally Posted by mrcimino1
OK, Bubbashow, if the advertising you sell comes with all of these conditions and disclaimers, then WHY would anyone buy it???
You're joking, right? Every-time you upgrade your software, you agree to terms, conditions and disclaimers. Do you really think people are not going to buy iTunes music because the arbitration clause states, IIRC, that the arbitration is to take place in Luxembourg or Egypt, or somewhere like that. Moreover, do you realize what an iTunes song would cost if Apple weren't indemnified?

Originally Posted by mrcimino1
Likewise, either DL offers and advertises a product for sale and then provides it "as advertised" when purchased by a passenger, or they just stay completely out of the "add-on market" because they can't/won't provide what the traveler wants to pay for. If there are a lot of conditions/disclaimers regarding a PAID upgrade to a premium cabin then who would even consider this offer?
No. An advertisement is not an offer to form a binding contract in almost all instances; rather it's an invitation to make an offer. Accepting your money and then not providing a service is an entirely different matter. Moreover, hundreds, if not thousands, of people are paying for upgrades on a daily basis under DL's terms of carriage. FCM?

DL is trying to improve the onboard premium experience here. With DL's strategy to limit upgrades to Y+, I can't see them creating a lot of 'add-ons' in FC. There's only so much the FA can do in a two or three hour flight window. I don't think a Sky Chef a la TK or OS to prepare meals to order is in the cards here any-time soon
CHOPCHOP767 is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 12:40 pm
  #205  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
Originally Posted by bubbashow
Because people choose not to see details. ... They ignore the details. False advertising? Not even close.
Really?

Radio commercial with "the details" provided in the last 4 seconds by someone speaking at 5X normal conversational speed and several times faster than comprehension speed.

TV commercial with "the details" provided in 15 lines of minute font in white or light grey color superimposed over a barely contrasting background color, displayed for only a few seconds (not enough time to read it all even if it were legible).

Web page where "the details" must be accessed on another page and the link that must be clicked is half-way down the page in minuscule font and a color that barely contrasts with the background.

All of the above are very commonly encountered.

So, you would assert that the customers who would be disadvantaged by the above (by design, one must assume) "chose not to see the details"?

I suspect that there is a multitude of folks (P. T. Barnum reincarnates) in the advertising and media industries who would assert that advertisement, as exemplified above, is all-right because it is not expressly illegal.

StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 12:59 pm
  #206  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL PM, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 8,414
Originally Posted by DCADeltaRoadWarrior
If Delta charges for food in FC, higher probability that it will be edible.
LOL. No. The only thing that would be higher would be their profit.
jdrtravel is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 1:03 pm
  #207  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE USA
Programs: DL DM/MM , IHG Plat, MR Titanium, HH Gold, EK Frequent Kettle, UA Silver, AA Hater
Posts: 2,020
My head hurts after reading this thread......

Unless something changed, I seriously doubt extras are boarded. I know for a fact there were not extras in the past.

I also believe boarding extras would be wasteful and unnecessary.

The exception to this IMO is international J; given the cost boarding extras is justified.

I can count on one hand the number of times I have not gotten my choice in 30 years of flying....

I thought I was anal but I have never even thought about FEBO. Thanks for making me feel better!

I view this as a good thing, giving customers more of what they want.

I do hope they would focus more on quality......does not matter if I get my choice if it is no good.

Bon appetit
dilbertsdaddy is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 1:14 pm
  #208  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
Originally Posted by dilbertsdaddy
...

I view this as a good thing, giving customers more of what they want.

I do hope they would focus more on quality......does not matter if I get my choice if it is no good.

Bon appetit
^

That, after all, was the original topic of the thread.

But, I have heard a lot about probability theory here. Now, if I only knew how much of it was correct.
StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 1:32 pm
  #209  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 5,292
Originally Posted by StayingHomeIsBetter
So, you would assert that the customers who would be disadvantaged by the above (by design, one must assume) "chose not to see the details"?

I suspect that there is a multitude of folks (P. T. Barnum reincarnates) in the advertising and media industries who would assert that advertisement, as exemplified above, is all-right because it is not expressly illegal.

Right or wrong, we live in a society in which we should know to look beyond the shiny headline or slogan. To be fixated on "false advertising" is a waste of time, especially with a company the size of Delta that has multiple lawyers that pour over copy and claims for a living.

Edited to add: Look at the pages and pages of upgrade complaints in the DL forum....dozens of people who refuse to look within the parenthesis at the words (space available). People see what they want to see and that often isn't the reality.
bubbashow is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2016, 2:12 pm
  #210  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by bubbashow
Boy you are quite focused on advertising. From someone who makes his living off of advertising, I can tell you most of it comes with conditions and disclaimers. Hardly any can be taken at face value.
Delta would have to add more conditions and disclaimers, which they probably don't want to do.
sethb is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.