Emotional Support Animals, Service Dogs and Comfort Pets: The Definitive Thread
#515
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
The suggestion was to allow pets in the cabin providing that the owner purchases an extra seat if needed. I suggested that people with ESAs should also be required to purchase the second seat if needed.
#516
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
It wasn't enforced on my most recent flight. Two people in C+ were relocated to the very back of regular coach so that an uncaged dog could stretch out in the bulkhead row. From the behavior, I assume it was an ESA.
#517
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CHS
Programs: Delta, AA, BA, United, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Honors Diamond, SPG Marriott Gold, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 1,142
Maybe it's not the money.
I think a lot of pet owners go to the effort and expense of getting the ESA letter so the dog can get out of the carrier and sit on their lap.
I think a lot of pet owners go to the effort and expense of getting the ESA letter so the dog can get out of the carrier and sit on their lap.
#518
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL PM, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 8,414
I do think that this would help cut down on some of the abuse of ESA. I think that people are really loath to put pets in the cargo hold with all of the horror stories out there about what can happen to them. I would certainly never do it to my dog. My animal fits perfectly under the seat, he is very small. I find the pet pricing to be infuriating.
#519
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
The pet fee is just another example of a fee that has no realistic relationship to the actual incremental cost to the airline.
It is only that high because the airline is in position to unjustly dictate terms.
That said, I do not support the practice of declaring a pet to be an ESA in order to fraudulently avoid the fee.
Pet owners should be fighting the fee, not ducking it.
It is only that high because the airline is in position to unjustly dictate terms.
That said, I do not support the practice of declaring a pet to be an ESA in order to fraudulently avoid the fee.
Pet owners should be fighting the fee, not ducking it.
#520
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,944
If *everyone* wanted to travel with a pet then the price would probably rapidly approach the incremental cost. In the absence of that condition, an airline could just as well choose to price it high enough to discourage it if they feel it's a hassle and/or annoys other customers (whether said annoyance is justified or not)
#521
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL PM, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 8,414
The free market argument only goes so far with airlines, IMO. They form an essential part of the infrastructure of the country and are in various ways tax-payer subsidized (some airports and airlines more than others). They risk inviting more regulation the more obnoxious they become with fees.
#522
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,944
The free market argument only goes so far with airlines, IMO. They form an essential part of the infrastructure of the country and are in various ways tax-payer subsidized (some airports and airlines more than others). They risk inviting more regulation the more obnoxious they become with fees.
*long-time pet owner, though currently between cats (and likely to remain so as long as I keep traveling frequently), though I haven't ever flown with a pet
#523
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,375
... which is also known as "pricing" I mean things like french fries and sodas are sold in fast food establishments for significantly more than their incremental cost to the restaurant.
If *everyone* wanted to travel with a pet then the price would probably rapidly approach the incremental cost. In the absence of that condition, an airline could just as well choose to price it high enough to discourage it if they feel it's a hassle and/or annoys other customers (whether said annoyance is justified or not)
If *everyone* wanted to travel with a pet then the price would probably rapidly approach the incremental cost. In the absence of that condition, an airline could just as well choose to price it high enough to discourage it if they feel it's a hassle and/or annoys other customers (whether said annoyance is justified or not)
over the past 30 years we have willingly paid whatever fees were required to bring a cat in an approved under-seat carrier on the plane with us ... none of the trips were hassle-free, but none of the hassles involved other passengers or FAs
pic is from Apr 2015, DCA-MSP-SEA
#524
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,944
#525
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,375