USA contactless credit/debit/transit (2014-2016)
#5267
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SW Michigan, ex SF Bay Area
Posts: 833
Chase Sapphire Preferred Visa.
My copy of the receipt doesn't seem to? It has "VISA", "Contactless", card # (12 *s then last 4 of device card #), "**/**". Below the amount it says "APPROVED", "VISA", "AID: A0000000031010" and "TVR: 00 00 00 00 00".
Unfortunately I don't remember what other differences there may have been on the merchant receipt. The only reason I saw it was that she handed it to me to sign, which was when I saw that it said No Signature Required. Seemed like she hadn't seen that before either.
Not sure what you mean. That they just hadn't set a limit for contactless payments without signature?
Unfortunately I don't remember what other differences there may have been on the merchant receipt. The only reason I saw it was that she handed it to me to sign, which was when I saw that it said No Signature Required. Seemed like she hadn't seen that before either.
Not sure what you mean. That they just hadn't set a limit for contactless payments without signature?
#5268
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Because that makes far more sense than 6k signature free. Either is a misconfiguration, really. It should say "Verified by cardholder device" or similar, just as PIN should have said "Verified by PIN"... "No signature required" is meant for when signature CVM is used.
#5269
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Either that, or the terminal configuration is wrong. Well, either way it's wrong. "No signature required" is generally intended to indicate signature CVM was used but signature was waived. Though I have seen it for PIN transactions on some merchant terminals in the US, and as I type that - it makes me realise that's what it was. Probably the SAME merchant terminal, in fact.
Because that makes far more sense than 6k signature free. Either is a misconfiguration, really. It should say "Verified by cardholder device" or similar, just as PIN should have said "Verified by PIN"... "No signature required" is meant for when signature CVM is used.
Because that makes far more sense than 6k signature free. Either is a misconfiguration, really. It should say "Verified by cardholder device" or similar, just as PIN should have said "Verified by PIN"... "No signature required" is meant for when signature CVM is used.
#5270
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,723
So my local Goodwill has finally enabled the EMV on their iSC250's and they use Radiant hardware. They also switched to NCR Counterpoint software with NFC enabled. ^ But the registers are so old that they show a signature thing on the screen but it doesn't capture the signature so you have to still sign a piece of paper. I've seen that same system at a different Goodwill division with NFC too so that may be their corporate pos system. NCR with EMV almost always seems to support NFC as well, with Retalix and Counterpoint having both that I have seen.
#5271
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 153
It means the terminal floor limit and CVM limit are wrong configured (very large values).
#5272
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
#5273
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
So my local Goodwill has finally enabled the EMV on their iSC250's and they use Radiant hardware. They also switched to NCR Counterpoint software with NFC enabled. ^ But the registers are so old that they show a signature thing on the screen but it doesn't capture the signature so you have to still sign a piece of paper. I've seen that same system at a different Goodwill division with NFC too so that may be their corporate pos system. NCR with EMV almost always seems to support NFC as well, with Retalix and Counterpoint having both that I have seen.
#5274
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: Delta - Silver; UA - Silver; HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Spire Ambassador; Marriott Bonvoy - Titanium
Posts: 14,185
I have a trip to Iceland coming up next year, so was pleased to run across this very encouraging report (assuming Android and Samsung Pay work equally well):
http://blog.nxp.com/security/it-may-...actless-is-hot
He doesn't mention having to sign anywhere, though the limit seems to be 4200 ISK (roughly $35). Note the gas pump photo, those have traditionally been a bane for U. S. cards, showing well over that.
http://blog.nxp.com/security/it-may-...actless-is-hot
He doesn't mention having to sign anywhere, though the limit seems to be 4200 ISK (roughly $35). Note the gas pump photo, those have traditionally been a bane for U. S. cards, showing well over that.
#5275
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
I have a trip to Iceland coming up next year, so was pleased to run across this very encouraging report (assuming Android and Samsung Pay work equally well):
http://blog.nxp.com/security/it-may-...actless-is-hot
He doesn't mention having to sign anywhere, though the limit seems to be 4200 ISK (roughly $35). Note the gas pump photo, those have traditionally been a bane for U. S. cards, showing well over that.
http://blog.nxp.com/security/it-may-...actless-is-hot
He doesn't mention having to sign anywhere, though the limit seems to be 4200 ISK (roughly $35). Note the gas pump photo, those have traditionally been a bane for U. S. cards, showing well over that.
#5276
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,592
So my local Goodwill has finally enabled the EMV on their iSC250's and they use Radiant hardware. They also switched to NCR Counterpoint software with NFC enabled. ^ But the registers are so old that they show a signature thing on the screen but it doesn't capture the signature so you have to still sign a piece of paper. I've seen that same system at a different Goodwill division with NFC too so that may be their corporate pos system. NCR with EMV almost always seems to support NFC as well, with Retalix and Counterpoint having both that I have seen.
#5277
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
I wonder if the FD130s are supposed to be temporary and the iSC250s are supposed to be the long-term solution going forward.
#5278
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Gold (OWE), Star Alliance Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,194
Chase Sapphire Preferred Visa.
My copy of the receipt doesn't seem to? It has "VISA", "Contactless", card # (12 *s then last 4 of device card #), "**/**". Below the amount it says "APPROVED", "VISA", "AID: A0000000031010" and "TVR: 00 00 00 00 00".
Unfortunately I don't remember what other differences there may have been on the merchant receipt. The only reason I saw it was that she handed it to me to sign, which was when I saw that it said No Signature Required. Seemed like she hadn't seen that before either.
Not sure what you mean. That they just hadn't set a limit for contactless payments without signature?
My copy of the receipt doesn't seem to? It has "VISA", "Contactless", card # (12 *s then last 4 of device card #), "**/**". Below the amount it says "APPROVED", "VISA", "AID: A0000000031010" and "TVR: 00 00 00 00 00".
Unfortunately I don't remember what other differences there may have been on the merchant receipt. The only reason I saw it was that she handed it to me to sign, which was when I saw that it said No Signature Required. Seemed like she hadn't seen that before either.
Not sure what you mean. That they just hadn't set a limit for contactless payments without signature?
#5279
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
I took an Uber yesterday and used Apple Pay in the app. The app acknowledged the Touch ID authorization (for $0.01) extremely quickly, unlike with the Starbucks app. That might be because I wasn't charged until after the ride finished, though.
I guess the point is that it might be Starbucks IT that makes reloads slower than they should be. I'll have to see next time I use something like Panera.
BTW I can't seem to remove cards from Uber. Anyone run into that issue before?
I guess the point is that it might be Starbucks IT that makes reloads slower than they should be. I'll have to see next time I use something like Panera.
BTW I can't seem to remove cards from Uber. Anyone run into that issue before?
#5280
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,592
I took an Uber yesterday and used Apple Pay in the app. The app acknowledged the Touch ID authorization (for $0.01) extremely quickly, unlike with the Starbucks app. That might be because I wasn't charged until after the ride finished, though.
I guess the point is that it might be Starbucks IT that makes reloads slower than they should be. I'll have to see next time I use something like Panera.
BTW I can't seem to remove cards from Uber. Anyone run into that issue before?
I guess the point is that it might be Starbucks IT that makes reloads slower than they should be. I'll have to see next time I use something like Panera.
BTW I can't seem to remove cards from Uber. Anyone run into that issue before?
As far as Starbucks are concerned, their Apple Pay authorisation speed seems fine most of the time. However, I once was double-charged when I cancelled a seemingly unresponsive authorisation and attempted a charge again. My only complaint overall is that they don't tell me what card I used to top-up in the email receipt.