Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

(Domestic) Again, Elites sit in back, non-revs up front (fact)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

(Domestic) Again, Elites sit in back, non-revs up front (fact)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2009, 7:42 am
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,867
Originally Posted by cerealmarketer
I hear United is pretty consistent about how it approaches rogue upgrades and standby clearing
There's F9 to IAH and AA to the northeast. UA is a no go for me, but these actions but rogue gate agents make CO seem UA-like (gasp). Hyperbole perhaps, but how much of this actually goes on??? It took a person with special access to the system to bust this agent...tip of the iceberg?
Bonehead is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 7:46 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: nyc
Programs: CO Plat & MP 1K
Posts: 870
This is of course upsetting and I hope that CO does fire the GA and reprimand those who took advantage of the illegal upgrades. But I am confused as to how a GA can do this? I thought that the new system was automatic and with the transparency of the pda site this sort of thing would not happen. I thought GA did not have the control to change what shows up on the pda. I guess I am wrong about this?
rlbmorton is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 7:50 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by Bonehead
Hyperbole perhaps, but how much of this actually goes on??? It took a person with special access to the system to bust this agent...tip of the iceberg?
Honestly, I've been the victim of it a couple times (that I knew about), and witnessed it a few more.
channa is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 7:51 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DCA
Programs: UA LT 1K, AA EXP, Bonvoy LT Titan, Avis PC, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,660
Originally Posted by rlbmorton
This is of course upsetting and I hope that CO does fire the GA and reprimand those who took advantage of the illegal upgrades. But I am confused as to how a GA can do this? I thought that the new system was automatic and with the transparency of the pda site this sort of thing would not happen. I thought GA did not have the control to change what shows up on the pda. I guess I am wrong about this?

Clearing the battefield upgrades is not automatic. We have suggested this before, but the feedback from GAs that post - is they need the flexibility and cite some examples.

However, I think it should be automatic. With the start of screen displays - the upgrade list will be more visible to the average passenger.

Last edited by cova; Apr 19, 2009 at 8:15 am
cova is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 7:53 am
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by rlbmorton
This is of course upsetting and I hope that CO does fire the GA and reprimand those who took advantage of the illegal upgrades. But I am confused as to how a GA can do this? I thought that the new system was automatic and with the transparency of the pda site this sort of thing would not happen. I thought GA did not have the control to change what shows up on the pda. I guess I am wrong about this?
This one is a little unusual -- it looks like the GA didn't clear the last of the upgrades. Of course when questioned, the GA will say it was that crazy weather day, needed to get the flight closed, sorry, or something like she did them manually, it was a hectic day. There's no way a GA is going to lose her job over this.

Typically what I've seen happen is that the GA doles out the battlefield upgrades, doesn't distribute them, and the seats either go out empty or are given away "under the table" to friends/nonrevs/etc. This way, the computer is right, if someone in Houston wants to audit them, and only if a customer complains will this ever come to the surface (and not many people check their online itin en route or after travel, so this likelihood is low).
channa is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 7:56 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oakland Park, FL
Programs: AA EXP, DL PM
Posts: 480
Originally Posted by cova
With the start of screen displays - the upgrade list will be more visible to the average passenger.
It will be more visible but it certainly wont put an end to this type of thing. Delta agents in Atlanta work it all the time for their non-rev friends and every gate has a display. Solution? They just tell the computer not to display the upgrade list!
rcherskov is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 7:56 am
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,867
Originally Posted by channa
Honestly, I've been the victim of it a couple times (that I knew about), and witnessed it a few more.


Any particular station seem to be more problematic than others?
Bonehead is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:06 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,034
Originally Posted by Bonehead
...the employees who knowingly took seats in FC in violation of the rules should be reprimanded. "I was only following orders" doesn't cut it.
The non-revs did nothing wrong. As non-revs we pretty much are herded like little sheep and go where we're told, when we're told to. If a gate agent says sit in first, we sit in first because we don't know what's happening behind the scenes that caused them to put us there. This one was 100% the GA's call.

That being said, I agree that this type of thing shouldn't be allowed to happen and I don't think it does that often since there are now so many eyes on the first class cabin and so many tools available. Everyone knows this and are very hesitant to pull any shenanigans. If one thinks of it as stealing money from the company, well, that's a pretty serious infraction.
Originally Posted by BigPoppaCO
Apologies for the dumb question but what does non-rev elite mean? For that matter, does non-rev mean you are either a CO employee or someone travelling on miles?
non-rev = non-revenue PAX, It could be an employee or someone traveling on employee passes. It doesn't necessarily mean that zero was paid for the seat.

There's no such thing as a non-rev elite.
pptp is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:09 am
  #24  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by cova
Clearing the battefield upgrades is not automatic. We have suggested this before, but the feedback from GAs that post - is they need the flexibility and [c]ite some examples.

However, I think it should be automatic.
So you don't believe the GAs' reasons are sound and don't want them respected? Why?

It can easily be argued that this sort of situation is what results when employees are given discretion to "make things happen" for customers, rather than rules being strictly adhered to. The question of rules versus flexibility so which one is better?
sbm12 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:11 am
  #25  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by BigPoppaCO
Apologies for the dumb question but what does non-rev elite mean? For that matter, does non-rev mean you are either a CO employee or someone travelling on miles?
The OP can travel either as a non-rev or as a rev passenger. They fly enough on revenue tix that they are an elite. Hence the handle.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:12 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLL -> Where The Boyars Are
Programs: AA EXP 1.7 M, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, AARP Sophomore, 14-time Croix de Candlestick
Posts: 18,669
Originally Posted by Bonehead
Hyperbole perhaps, but how much of this actually goes on??? It took a person with special access to the system to bust this agent...tip of the iceberg?
During my dozen non-rev years on CO, I saw incidents like this far too often in the 1992-1995 period (especially ex-EWR). Thereafter, until my leaving non-rev status in 2001, CO management did a good job of greatly reducing, if not eliminating, these rogue practices.

It sounds like they may be creeping back - I hope CO will investigate and take whatever action is needed.
Non-NonRev is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:13 am
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by Bonehead
Any particular station seem to be more problematic than others?
DFW used to be a big problem, though I've seen it in various locations.


Originally Posted by pptp
There's no such thing as a non-rev elite.
Sure there is. Someone who has non-rev ability and uses it at times (e.g., family member of CO employee) but also has reasons which require confirmed travel, so he buys tickets and earns status as well (e.g., a job which requires that he get there at a specific time, hence the need confirmed travel).

In this case it's clear he was on a revenue ticket and flying as a paying customer.
channa is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:17 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York / Hawaii
Programs: UA Global Services, HH Diamond
Posts: 5,178
Compensation

Originally Posted by channa
And also ask what kind of compensation your friend can expect for the denied upgrade he was entitled to.
My experience says standard compensation in these situations is 15,000 OnePass miles ...which is the value of the standard domestic upgrade.
Weatherboy is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:18 am
  #29  
Moderator: Avis and Rental Cars
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,035
Originally Posted by CO_Nonrev_elite
I asked them how they managed to get up on passes when there are at least 5 elites in the back. They said they knew the agent, and that were basically told to go and take the seats in F and stay quiet.
Originally Posted by pptp
The non-revs did nothing wrong. As non-revs we pretty much are herded like little sheep and go where we're told, when we're told to. If a gate agent says sit in first, we sit in first because we don't know what's happening behind the scenes that caused them to put us there. This one was 100% the GA's call.
If the non-revs were told to "stay quiet" about sitting in F, they knew something was wrong and they are also to blame.
IAHtraveler is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2009, 8:32 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New York, New York
Programs: AA Gold, Alaska MVP; Free Agent Super Duper Diamond Treasure Chest ;)
Posts: 4,685
Originally Posted by IAHtraveler
If the non-revs were told to "stay quiet" about sitting in F, they knew something was wrong and they are also to blame.
and in this case, it might have served them well to have adhered to instructions
knit-in is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.