![]() |
Originally Posted by BThumme
(Post 26617973)
Anyone see this video of the line from Midway? Yikes!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byUV...ature=youtu.be |
Originally Posted by petaluma1
(Post 26617240)
On NBC Nightly News, 35% of new screeners leave in the first year. (Sorry, no link yet.) Also 117 leave a week, not 103 as previously reported. Nightly News pushing Pre with nary a word about all the complaints about the "program."
|
Long waits for TSA screening along with all the other apparent TSA issues might help to bring an end to TSA as we know it. If the public can tough it out for a short time the outcome might be worth it.
|
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 26619906)
Long waits for TSA screening along with all the other apparent TSA issues might help to bring an end to TSA as we know it. If the public can tough it out for a short time the outcome might be worth it.
|
Originally Posted by RockyMtnScotsman
(Post 26619955)
I wouldn't bet on it. In fact, I'd wager just the opposite - that their funding will grow immensely to "address the problem".
|
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 26619906)
Long waits for TSA screening along with all the other apparent TSA issues might help to bring an end to TSA as we know it. If the public can tough it out for a short time the outcome might be worth it.
Originally Posted by RockyMtnScotsman
(Post 26619955)
I wouldn't bet on it. In fact, I'd wager just the opposite - that their funding will grow immensely to "address the problem".
|
Originally Posted by TWA884
(Post 26606787)
NBC News:
The Dallas Morning News:
Originally Posted by petaluma1
(Post 26615991)
Reports are beginning to surface that lines are so backed up that TSA isn't using body scanners or requiring that shoes be off/liquids of carry-ons in order to speed things up.
Mike |
Originally Posted by petaluma1
(Post 26615991)
Reports are beginning to surface that lines are so backed up that TSA isn't using body scanners or requiring that shoes be off/liquids of carry-ons in order to speed things up.
What you posted is everyday operation of Managed Inclusion I. Remember ONLY Managed Inclusion II was canceled. More dogs,presumably for conducting Managed Inclusion, has been reported for weeks in National and local media. And yes the dogs are most certainly for the purpose to speed things up. |
Originally Posted by mikeef
(Post 26620746)
Well, that's the least they could do. No, seriously: There is no action that they could have taken that would have required less effort. And given that they need the government, they won't do anything to tick it off until their pocketbooks start getting hit.
Originally Posted by mikeef
(Post 26620746)
Hang on, hang on, no liquid checks for imaginary explosives? Is it still safe to fly? How am I supposed to know for sure that that 83-year old woman actually needs to be in a wheelchair and isn't just a terrorist trying to smuggle through a bomb in her shoe?
Mike |
Originally Posted by gingersnaps
(Post 26620825)
You mean Real Time Threat Assesment aka Managed Includion 1?
What you posted is everyday operation of Managed Inclusion I. Remember ONLY Managed Inclusion II was canceled. More dogs,presumably for conducting Managed Inclusion, has been reported for weeks in National and local media. And yes the dogs are most certainly for the purpose to speed things up. |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 26620954)
Come on, Mike. An 83-year-old woman in a wheelchair would never hide something nasty in her shoes. 'Everyone' (aka TSA) knows she'd put it in her bosom or near her genitals.
I looked back as I was moving away, and the scanner monitor with the gumby image clearly showed a single "anomaly" centered right on gumby's crotch. I felt bad for the woman, because we all know what was about to happen to her :( |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 26620954)
From comments I've seen, some of the airlines are making a minor windfall out of this in rebooking fees.
Come on, Mike. An 83-year-old woman in a wheelchair would never hide something nasty in her shoes. 'Everyone' (aka TSA) knows she'd put it in her bosom or near her genitals. Mike |
Originally Posted by BSBD
(Post 26621077)
This morning in MIA I was going through the PreCheck line. A woman in front of me got the "random quota" beep, and was sent to the scanner. As I was collecting my carry-on luggage from the x-Ray chute, I heard the TSO manning the scanner tell the woman that she would have to wait post-scanner for female assist. The woman loudly burst into tears.
I looked back as I was moving away, and the scanner monitor with the gumby image clearly showed a single "anomaly" centered right on gumby's crotch. I felt bad for the woman, because we all know what was about to happen to her :( BTW, Peter Greenberg on WCBS this a.m. said that TSA will not have enough new screeners trained to ease travel this summer - which we all know - but this was the first time I'd heard anyone "official" say anything. It's something that needs to be said more often. |
At LAS C gates. Crowd very reasonable. I glanced at checkpoint for D gates and had major waits. Night and day.
|
The TSA head is scamming the public. He claims that the current wait times are a result of what he inherited and too little staffing.
The TSA line waits didn't become so bad so quickly because of what happened two years ago or earlier with TSA staffing levels. Neff's a bozo, and I can't take seriously any insinuation that this rather big and sudden increase in wait times is due to things beyond decisions he made and advanced across the board. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:00 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.