![]() |
Originally Posted by jonessher
(Post 37178071)
Wonder whether UO will launch BKI and kick AK out of this route too.
AK literally competes with 4 other carriers on BKI-ICN, and has flights to all three major Greater Bay airports (SZX/HKG/CAN). AK has gotten the HKG/SZX/CAN market segmented properly and I don't see them sitting out of HKG just because UO decides to join. |
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 37181784)
wonder why you always put a list of mostly unprofitable routes for CX to launch....
CX doesn't have a lot of planes anymore ,and route planning and capacity needs to be smart, this applies to all airlines around the world and if CX resumes SEA somehow, they are entering a bloodbath market, I still think its unlikely to resume. |
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 37181784)
wonder why you always put a list of mostly unprofitable routes for CX to launch....
CX doesn't have a lot of planes anymore ,and route planning and capacity needs to be smart, this applies to all airlines around the world and if CX resumes SEA somehow, they are entering a bloodbath market, I still think its unlikely to resume. |
Originally Posted by jonessher
(Post 37182343)
agree, CX will better do more MAD, MUC, BRU, or even more FRA. LGW is possible when CX receive more aircrafts.
well as well.close this thread till 2028? |
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 37181784)
wonder why you always put a list of mostly unprofitable routes for CX to launch....
CX doesn't have a lot of planes anymore ,and route planning and capacity needs to be smart, this applies to all airlines around the world and if CX resumes SEA somehow, they are entering a bloodbath market, I still think its unlikely to resume. |
Originally Posted by wadia13
(Post 37182577)
Agree, but you think Casablanca would be profitable? See your earlier post #1896.
Post Covid BRI flow is very notable and accelerating. Morocco is one of main FIFA 2030 hosts. Gulf carriers high and growing load factors suggest there’s demand. CZ is signaling they’re also entering. Imo the indicators are there. |
Originally Posted by CX860
(Post 37182558)
Why do you think VIE would be unprofitable? Yes OS tried and left but it has service from TPE, HND and ICN so its not that exotic for Asia PoS.
|
Originally Posted by eclipseer
(Post 37183191)
Not OP but I’d wager CMN is actively discussed.
Post Covid BRI flow is very notable and accelerating. Morocco is one of main FIFA 2030 hosts. Gulf carriers high and growing load factors suggest there’s demand. CZ is signaling they’re also entering. Imo the indicators are there. |
Originally Posted by jonessher
(Post 37183241)
CZ could be doing political missions though. PRC airlines even do South America and Mexico now and i question whether those routes are profitable too.
|
Originally Posted by jonessher
(Post 37183240)
It can be seasonal like Rome.
|
Originally Posted by CX860
(Post 37182558)
Why do you think VIE would be unprofitable? Yes OS tried and left but it has service from TPE, HND and ICN so its not that exotic for Asia PoS.
About CMN, I only referenced it as it has been stated many times in this thread, and I believe it has more potential than SEA due to less competition and the airport has barely any Asia flights, a great way to get more passengers. Though I don't see CX launching CMN anytime until 2028 likely. |
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 37183372)
I honestly think VIE is fine, transit traffic would be strong. I mentioned most of the routes the poster mentioned in previous posts are rather unprofitable and don't make a lot of sense, not all of them.
|
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 37183372)
I honestly think VIE is fine, transit traffic would be strong. I mentioned most of the routes the poster mentioned in previous posts are rather unprofitable and don't make a lot of sense, not all of them.
About CMN, I only referenced it as it has been stated many times in this thread, and I believe it has more potential than SEA due to less competition and the airport has barely any Asia flights, a great way to get more passengers. Though I don't see CX launching CMN anytime until 2028 likely. BRU is a different story since CX has axed much capacity from AMS and CDG vs prior COVID. All in all, the biggest issue is shortage of plane, and the need to balance cargo demand. |
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 37183372)
I honestly think VIE is fine, transit traffic would be strong. I mentioned most of the routes the poster mentioned in previous posts are rather unprofitable and don't make a lot of sense, not all of them.
About CMN, I only referenced it as it has been stated many times in this thread, and I believe it has more potential than SEA due to less competition and the airport has barely any Asia flights, a great way to get more passengers. Though I don't see CX launching CMN anytime until 2028 likely. |
Originally Posted by brunos
(Post 37183758)
CMN already has a dailly EK flight (388). QR has a flight 6 days a week and codeshare with AT on a daily flight. Lots of capacity to Asia. I doubt that CX could compete meaningfully, except for HK people (nonstop)..
according to some Cx insider , cx will launch CMN - a one world hub with connection to other places under the same alliance CX CE once said that they would launch a destination where there is no direct flight flying from hk before - likely CMN |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.