Thanks American, your upgrade "enhancement" has destroyed EXP for me!
#211
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
All that matters are the number of page views - and we're almost to 10k. KEEP CLICKING, people!
#212
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX/NYC
Programs: AAdvantage EXP (5.8MM Airpass) Delta Gold Medallion Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,330
Agree..wondering if AA will hear from business travelers paying top dollar sitting in Y while watching vacationers sit up front. In reality, the difference only matters in business markets where F seats are scarce. If these people complain, who are paying the most, it would be interesting to see if AA does something. It seems not very smart to reward those paying the least with the best seats but given AA's history (abandoned hubs/TWA/poor employee relations etc.)and $9 stock price, brains are in short supply there.
#213
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SJC/VCE
Programs: AA PLT (2.9+ MM), HH GLD, Hyatt Diamond, SPG PLT
Posts: 10,161
Vacationers who are also EXPs or traveling w/an EXP. A gold who books 7 months in advance still can't queue jump ahead of an EXP who books 2 days out.
#214
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 596
As far as I can tell this a thread where flyers are talking, about flying, on flyertalk.com,
Almost unimaginable really, let's wring our hands some more about this lamentable turn of events.
Almost unimaginable really, let's wring our hands some more about this lamentable turn of events.
#215
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Amb Elite & LT Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,230
If it's not maybe my firm should have a chat with AA. I think this would enable GA's, especially at DFW, handle 1+ flights at a time. No need for 10-20 EXP's to bother the GA to get on the list. For two flights that 20-40 interactions eliminated.
The check-in kiosks are much easier for people to get their boarding passes, OLCI is easier as well. I'd bet there was a message that went out to everyone tell them how great this was for them (yes there is a benefit) but I'm sure AA was also looking to reduce labor costs. What was the primary motivator in an industry that debate about passing out free pretzels?
Last edited by deac83; Mar 16, 2008 at 12:59 pm
#217
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 316
Perhaps their argument should be extended to those who 'care' about exit row seats!
They should complain to AA about the situation that allows a mere GLD vacationer to book an exit row in Y 7 months ahead, whilst "business travelers paying top dollar"(some possibly EXP) are sitting in a middle centre
seat.
A much better system would be to not allow any exit row to be reserved until the 24 hour point, then done by OLCI, or visiting the airport in the case of International flights.
#218
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Programs: A: PP, LTG/1.5M | UA: SLV | Bonvoy LTTi | IHG PLT| Avis PC | Nat'l Emerald Club EE
Posts: 1,067
Agree..wondering if AA will hear from business travelers paying top dollar sitting in Y while watching vacationers sit up front. In reality, the difference only matters in business markets where F seats are scarce. If these people complain, who are paying the most, it would be interesting to see if AA does something. It seems not very smart to reward those paying the least with the best seats but given AA's history (abandoned hubs/TWA/poor employee relations etc.)and $9 stock price, brains are in short supply there.
Maybe they're not as dumb as you think...put in a system to pi$$ off last-minute business travelers who mightn't otherwise be very open to fare-basis upgrade priority...and then implement fare-basis prioritization as a "lesser of 2 evils"...reminds me of that old story about how to boil a frog...
cheers!
#219
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Programs: UA GS, AA PLT LIFE, SPG Platinum, LHW LC, Fairmont PC
Posts: 128
For what it's worth, I've taken four flights since the new rules went into effect on 1 March, and as an EXP I've been upgraded all four times. I typically buy tickets at the last minute - so this really hasn't proven to be an issue for me. The only thing that I've noticed is the upgrades are clearing later - either at the 2 hour checkin or at the gate. Personally, I don't care when they clear, as long as they clear. My husband has had the same experience on completely different flights - four flights, four upgrades.
#220
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,176
Well I guess that's settled then. Believe what you want. The math is there.
If it's not maybe my firm should have a chat with AA. I think this would enable GA's, especially at DFW, handle 1+ flights at a time. No need for 10-20 EXP's to bother the GA to get on the list. For two flights that 20-40 interactions eliminated.
The check-in kiosks are much easier for people to get their boarding passes, OLCI is easier as well. I'd bet there was a message that went out to everyone tell them how great this was for them (yes there is a benefit) but I'm sure AA was also looking to reduce labor costs. What was the primary motivator in an industry that debate about passing out free pretzels?
If it's not maybe my firm should have a chat with AA. I think this would enable GA's, especially at DFW, handle 1+ flights at a time. No need for 10-20 EXP's to bother the GA to get on the list. For two flights that 20-40 interactions eliminated.
The check-in kiosks are much easier for people to get their boarding passes, OLCI is easier as well. I'd bet there was a message that went out to everyone tell them how great this was for them (yes there is a benefit) but I'm sure AA was also looking to reduce labor costs. What was the primary motivator in an industry that debate about passing out free pretzels?
I work anywhere between 2-6 AA flights a day , if I am not working the gates I am at the ticket counter.
This change has not reduced the amount of time I spend dealing with Elite Upgrade requests at the gate, if fact I probably now have twice as many people asking me if their upgrade has cleared as I used to get.
It might save me having to type out the entry to put someone on the list as for the most part the ticket agents now put you on the list . However , seeing as the entry to put some one on the list takes about 3 seconds , it is now simply three seconds that the TA spends adding the entry rather than the GA . The entry used to put someone on the list is very simple..
GL123-SMITHXUPG1
If your working the gate you can also dedicate the set to one particular flight so you dont even have to type the flight number, takes it down to about 2 seconds.
I am curious as to how you think this will enable GA's to handle 1+ flight at a time ?
#221
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.
Posts: 7,664
I work anywhere between 2-6 AA flights a day , if I am not working the gates I am at the ticket counter.
This change has not reduced the amount of time I spend dealing with Elite Upgrade requests at the gate, if fact I probably now have twice as many people asking me if their upgrade has cleared as I used to get.
It might save me having to type out the entry to put someone on the list as for the most part the ticket agents now put you on the list . However , seeing as the entry to put some one on the list takes about 3 seconds , it is now simply three seconds that the TA spends adding the entry rather than the GA . The entry used to put someone on the list is very simple..
GL123-SMITHXUPG1
If your working the gate you can also dedicate the set to one particular flight so you dont even have to type the flight number, takes it down to about 2 seconds.
I am curious as to how you think this will enable GA's to handle 1+ flight at a time ?
This change has not reduced the amount of time I spend dealing with Elite Upgrade requests at the gate, if fact I probably now have twice as many people asking me if their upgrade has cleared as I used to get.
It might save me having to type out the entry to put someone on the list as for the most part the ticket agents now put you on the list . However , seeing as the entry to put some one on the list takes about 3 seconds , it is now simply three seconds that the TA spends adding the entry rather than the GA . The entry used to put someone on the list is very simple..
GL123-SMITHXUPG1
If your working the gate you can also dedicate the set to one particular flight so you dont even have to type the flight number, takes it down to about 2 seconds.
I am curious as to how you think this will enable GA's to handle 1+ flight at a time ?
mike
#222
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 33,545
Second, how is using check-in time under the old system gaining an unfair advantage? This information was published on the AA website where it said that check-in time was used to determine upgrade priority within 3 hours. So, we were taking unfair advantage of those who choose not to read the website for the airline they're flying? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
And don't bring up the 4 hour deal, because the new change only goes into effect at 3 hours and, hence, has no impact on that particular "feature," fair or not.
So, where is this "clearly unfair advantage" that we used to have?
Cheers.
#224
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY (finally); previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM; BA GLD
Posts: 17,256
http://www.law.cornell.edu/nyctap/I92_0243.htm
#225
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX/NYC
Programs: AAdvantage EXP (5.8MM Airpass) Delta Gold Medallion Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,330
...and wouldn't it be interesting if AA cites this as the reason to implement upgrade priority according to fare basis?
Maybe they're not as dumb as you think...put in a system to pi$$ off last-minute business travelers who mightn't otherwise be very open to fare-basis upgrade priority...and then implement fare-basis prioritization as a "lesser of 2 evils"...reminds me of that old story about how to boil a frog...
cheers!
Maybe they're not as dumb as you think...put in a system to pi$$ off last-minute business travelers who mightn't otherwise be very open to fare-basis upgrade priority...and then implement fare-basis prioritization as a "lesser of 2 evils"...reminds me of that old story about how to boil a frog...
cheers!
The market will dictate the next wave of consolidation and then things will get interesting.