Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 19, 2017, 10:25 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: 24left
Jan 18 2021 TC issues Airworthiness Directive for the 737 MAX
Link to post https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32976892-post4096.html

Cabin photos

Post 976 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29534462-post976.html
Post 1300 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29780203-post1300.html

Cabin Layout

Interior Specs can be found here https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/home/fly/onboard/fleet.html







- Window seats may feel narrower to come as the armrests are placed "into" the "curvature" of the cabin.
- Seats with no windows feel even more narrower as there is no space created by the curvature of window.
- All bulkhead seats have very limited legroom.
- Seats 15A, 16A, 16F, 17A and 17F have limited windows.
- Exit rows 19 and 20 have more legroom than regular preferred seats.

Routes

The 737 MAX is designated to replace the A320-series. Based on announcements and schedule updates, the following specific routes will be operated by the 737 MAX in future:

YYZ-LAX (periodic flights)
YYZ-SNN (new route)
YUL-DUB (new route)
YYZ/YUL-KEF (replacing Rouge A319)
YYT-LHR (replacing Mainline A319)
YHZ-LHR (replacing Mainline B767)
Hawaii Routes YVR/YYC (replacing Rouge B767)
Many domestic trunk routes (YYZ, YVR, YUL, YYC) now operated by 7M8, replacing A320 family
Print Wikipost

Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2019, 8:29 am
  #3211  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Halifax
Programs: AC SE100K, Marriott Lifetime Platinum Elite. NEXUS
Posts: 4,570
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
IMO, it would have been better for EASA to work with FAA, not unilaterally impose their own requirements for certification.
"Unilaterally" is a big word that implies that EASA isn't talking to the FAA anymore.

Why would you not assume that Boeing, the FAA, EASA, TC, etc, all were in a room, various parties listed off desires; the FAA listed off one list of requireements , EASA (and perhaps others) agreed to different lists, and, unable to reconcile those, respectfully went off in different directions?
RangerNS is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 1:55 pm
  #3212  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC*SEMM
Posts: 602
Air Canada send its MAX in Arizona

Will we see them ever again? 25% of Airlines apparently have an option to cancel all future orders .. starting next month ...

https://www.wingsoverquebec.com/?p=8903
Air Canada has confirmed to us that they have begun transferring process of some of their MAX to Arizona. Here is the translation if the official response from Air Canada media relations that we received in French:

“Due to uncertainty about the timing of regulatory approval to return the Boeing 737 MAX to service, we have begun moving some Boeing 737s to Arizona like other airlines. The reason is that the hot and dry climate found in the desert allows optimal conditions for aircraft storage. We have the necessary permissions from the regulatory agencies to operate these fery flights even if the prohibition of take-off, landing or overflight of Canadian airspace by any commercial passenger flights operated by Boeing 737 MAX aircraft is still in effect. The schedule of movements of the aifrafts is still not finalized. “

This is probably the best decision that Air Canada could make in the current circumstances.
YUL_Around_The_World is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 1:59 pm
  #3213  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: YYT
Programs: M-Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Aeroplan 50K, DragonPass, AMEX MR, NEXUS
Posts: 1,715
I think this makes the most sense!

Even Sunwing has the MAX out of service until next Spring at the earliest. It would be very bad for the planes to be parked for the entirety of a cold Canadian winter!

So is the desert becoming a MAX storage area, or MAX boneyard? Hard to tell...Lol
codfather is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 3:15 pm
  #3214  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by codfather
I think this makes the most sense!

Even Sunwing has the MAX out of service until next Spring at the earliest. It would be very bad for the planes to be parked for the entirety of a cold Canadian winter!

So is the desert becoming a MAX storage area, or MAX boneyard? Hard to tell...Lol
The normal process with storage lockers is you take stuff that you don't want to toss out, you put in a locker eventually forget about, stop paying the rent and then a reality TV show comes along where people bid on your long forgotten treasures.

If only aircraft storage was that simple.
ffsim, D582, canadiancow and 2 others like this.
Fiordland is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 3:39 pm
  #3215  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: TK *G
Posts: 3,099
Originally Posted by Fiordland
The normal process with storage lockers is you take stuff that you don't want to toss out, you put in a locker eventually forget about, stop paying the rent and then a reality TV show comes along where people bid on your long forgotten treasures.

If only aircraft storage was that simple.
There are indeed some aircrafts parked somewhere without a owner: https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/m...ntl/index.html

This can happen when the airlines goes bankrupt, and the creditors are also bankrupt or can not be found. If the MAX issue lasts long enough, I can see some airlines may end up in this kind of situation.
Fiordland likes this.
songsc is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 8:31 pm
  #3216  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,746
Originally Posted by codfather
So is the desert becoming a MAX storage area, or MAX boneyard? Hard to tell...Lol
Maybe Evraz Metals can set up a shredder to push the planes through. Works well for automobiles, the crushed car goes in one and, and the various streams of metal pieces no bigger than 2" come out the other end.
Jagboi is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2019, 1:12 am
  #3217  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,805
Meanwhile "regulatory scrutiny" delays Boeing's schedule. Translating spin doctor's talk: Boeing has to delay to satisfy regulatory requirements...

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...max-ti-460806/
Stranger is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2019, 10:10 am
  #3218  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355
Originally Posted by Stranger
Meanwhile "regulatory scrutiny" delays Boeing's schedule. Translating spin doctor's talk: Boeing has to delay to satisfy regulatory requirements...

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...max-ti-460806/
I noted the part where Boeing's CEO talks about a "phased ungrouding" of the MAX.

Sounds like a dodgy electrician's strategy to me.
expert7700 and eigenvector like this.
transportprof is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2019, 4:13 pm
  #3219  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,449
Exclamation

Just a reminder that this isn't the Airbus issues thread so let's refrain from wandering into real or perceived issues with other manufacturers aircraft.

tcook052
Ac forum mod.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2019, 6:57 am
  #3220  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Interesting article from Reuters UK Sept 13 2019

Crisis-hit Boeing readies huge effort to return 737 MAX to the skies




QUOTES:

"Boeing will have to juggle the delivery of two different MAX categories: some 250 produced since the ban, parked at various facilities in tail-to-nose configurations that conjure the puzzle game Tetris; and those that will roll off the production line post-approval.

Airlines will mostly handle a third category involving the return to service of 387 aircraft flown before the grounding, though Boeing has already deployed teams around the world to help companies get ready for that process."

Full article:
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-et...-idUKKCN1VY1OC
.
bimmerdriver likes this.
24left is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2019, 11:20 am
  #3221  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: YVR
Programs: AC E50K, NEXUS
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by 24left
Interesting article from Reuters UK Sept 13 2019
I was going to post this link. The "huge effort" on the part of Boeing (and its airline customers) would not be happening if there was not a clear pathway to the MAXes being cleared to fly. Anyone thinking the MAXes will be scrapped should think again.
bimmerdriver is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2019, 11:36 am
  #3222  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Erstwhile Accidental AC E35K
Posts: 2,917
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
Anyone thinking the MAXes will be scrapped should think again.
Not scrapped, obviously, but very possibly rebranded and called something else, especially those not yet delivered.

How about 737MD/MD? “Maximum Density/Maximum Discomfort”
Sopwith is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2019, 11:41 am
  #3223  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: YVR
Programs: AC E50K, NEXUS
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by RangerNS
"Unilaterally" is a big word that implies that EASA isn't talking to the FAA anymore.

Why would you not assume that Boeing, the FAA, EASA, TC, etc, all were in a room, various parties listed off desires; the FAA listed off one list of requireements , EASA (and perhaps others) agreed to different lists, and, unable to reconcile those, respectfully went off in different directions?
Not sure how you interpreted my use of the word unilateral implied EASA isn't talking to the FAA anymore.

Unilateral:

(of an action or decision) performed by or affecting only one person, group, or country involved in a particular situation, without the agreement of another or the others.
I used the word intentionally because IMO the announcement of EASA's conditions was made in a manner that indicates to me that FAA does not agree with their demands. I say that for several reasons.

First, because Ky gave no indication that EASA had discussed its conditions with FAA and FAA was in agreement. Surely, if FAA was in agreement with EASA's conditions, he would have said so.

Second, there has been no comment from FAA or Boeing expressing agreement with the demands of EASA.

Third, because had Boeing been aware of EASA's demands and accepted them, there would not have been a statement from Ky that EASA was making demands that are over and above what Boeing is already working on in cooperation with FAA, because Boeing would already be working on them.

EASA must be aware of what Boeing has been working on under the oversight of the FAA for the past several months. If EASA was in agreement with it they would not be making demands over and above what Boeing is doing under the oversight of the FAA.
bimmerdriver is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2019, 8:13 pm
  #3224  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Leeham News - Sept 13 2019

Look to 2013 787 grounding to see how Boeing will return MAX to service


QUOTES:

"These technical people will be tasked with “un-pickling” the airplanes: opening up seals on pitot tubes, air ducts, engines, etc. Making sure fluids are pure and all control surfaces work. Powering up the engines, APU. Making sure the airplanes are free of insects, rodents and birds. The list goes on."

...... "Boeing doesn’t have the parts and tooling logistics for the MAX that was required for the 787. But the sheer number of airplanes creates a different set of logistics challenges.

The first MAXes returned to service will be newly produced ones from the Renton (WA) factory.

These won’t have been “pickled,” and the software upgrades should be installed during final assembly.

This is probably what Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg in thinking when he says the MAX could return to service in the early fourth quarter. Preparing the produced-but-undelivered airplanes for RTS and bringing back to life the grounded airplanes will take longer.

The level of pilot training required remains unclear and could affect the RTS."


Full article

https://leehamnews.com/2019/09/13/lo...ce/#more-31161
24left is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2019, 10:40 am
  #3225  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: TK *G
Posts: 3,099
G&M article about one of AC 7M8s being used for senior training pilots for maintaining their license:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...checks-during/
songsc is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.