daniel46211

^ I can also relate... this is why I stopped doing things for the photos, I found that I absorb more that way instead of just finding different perspectives on how to capture a place, which is why a point and shoot like the RX100m2 serves me fine. I also recommend the RX100m2 to those who do not check baggage and want to stay light, whilst being able to capture amazing photos. The wifi is an added bonus for those travelling alone and want more selfie freedom or those who want to share the photos directly with friends through their phones.

I always have a 1DX & a variety of lens on me (50 1.2, 70-200 2.8, 16-35 2.8 & 24-70 2.8) when I am travelling, but that doesn't come out unless I really need it (in low light or when environmental conditions require it)

To backup, I have a Nexto DI for photos which is then mirrored to some Lacie Rugged SSD's - SD/CF cards are not cleared till I at least have 2 backups.

Braindrain

I had the LX7 up until very recently. I would not say it's outdated in that it takes excellent pictures. I found the optics (or software) to be a little sharper than the LX5 it replaced and, unless in very dim light situations, provided great contrast in pictures. At that price, I believe it's unmatched.

I recently bought the Sony RX100 II, only because it's a little smaller (physically) and I don't need to remember about the lens cap.

comptr

Wait why choose a Point and shoot or a Pro- Point and shoot like a Sony RX-100 when you could have a small camera with interchangeable lenses like a Olympus E-PL5 with a Panasonic 14mm or a Panasonic 20mm Lens and it would small and compact.

deniah

28-100mm (equiv) // 65* to 20* uncropped angle of view

riverkwai

I use a RX100 for my travel photos. It is very beneficial to be able to put the camera in my front pocket rather than swing it around my neck. Also less likely to get it stolen when it is in my pocket, my friend and I were in Central America a couple months ago and she had it around her neck only to get it swiped by someone on a dirt bike the first week we were there.

abmj-jr

Those "neck straps" should actually be used up and over the head and shoulder to become a cross-body shoulder strap, with the camera on the side, under the arm. To grab-and-run, someone would have to pull your head and shoulder off to get the camera. An added benefit is that it is far less stressful over the shoulder than pulling forward and down on the neck. MHO.

bmrisko

After shooting some with the LX7 over the weekend, I have mixed feelings. I am really looking at a way to stretch my budget now and the RX100 is a strong contender. I am not sure I need the wifi and tilt LCD on the RX100 II, but the smaller body of the RX100 is very appealing to me. Don't get me wrong, the LX7 is an awesome package, but may not be exactly the package I am looking for as a dedicated "small & fast" travel camera. The lens cap is one of the biggest annoyances to me right now, even though I know there is a fixed cap you can snap on, I feel it is something that Panasonic should have designed into the LX7. This one may be going back...

Braindrain

Just one caution. I do find I have less control "at hand" than the LX7. On the LX7, I could adjust just about anything and even have a good number of options even in auto mode. Not so much on the RX100. While the RX100 is smaller and has the convenience of an auto lens cap, there are often times I miss the control the LX7 had.

The grass isn't always greener so just be aware what you're potentially buying.

alphaod

D800E if it's serious road trip.

Otherwise my go-to camera these days is my RX100 Mk2

jacknyoc

we're doing a trip next month...Normandy and Paris...and I'm going to try sticking with my D7000 with 35mm prime and my Canon S100. I usually do the D7000 with zoom. But, I'm going off the zoom wagon and giving the prime the assignment. Wish me luck

ssullivan

Nice! Back when I shot only on film, for years the Canon EOS Rebel I bought in high school had only the original 50mm prime that I purchased with it. I shot a lot of trips with just that lens. While zooms are great, and sometime necessary, shooting prime only does make you stretch your creativity. You'll likely find yourself exploring new angles and ways to move closer (or further away).

steveman518

I take my trusty Canon T2i (550D) usually with one small lens (either a 50 prime or a short wide-angle like the 18-55 kit). I used to carry a small point-and-shoot, but I haven't bothered to get another one after it took a nice bath in the Amazon river...

jbcarioca

I use a Canon 6D, mostly carrying two or three lenses with me, but only one at a time while actually taking photos, based on the days conditions.

When that bulk irritates me too much I use my iPhone 5S. I often take the easy way out when I do not really need stellar quality.

frankly, for me the 6D is overkill. I am not really competent to use it...but I love it and I love what I can do with it, especially wildlife.

tune4jack

Love my Olympus E-PL2 (Olympus Digital Pen series w/ micro 4/3 sensor).

Not as bulky as a DSLR, yet the quality is quite good, and the price is right. Interchangeable lenses allow me the flexibility I want.

I do sometimes miss having a viewfinder. There is a $200 option to get a digital one, but I haven't been able to justify the additional cost yet.

Otherwise, I use my iPhone 5 when carrying a camera is prohibitive.

HansGolden

I picked up a Canon EOS M2 in Tokyo (the M2 is a big improvement over the M, but isn't available in the US) on an MR in March to supplement my Canon 5D Mark III. It's a great little camera that has an APS-C sensor, super-small lenses, and an adapter to accept EF/EF-S lenses. I've started carrying it on business trips and leaving my big daddy at home. I still take the full frame on leisure trips.