Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Fall 2008 Catering Changes at UA

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:15 am
  #91  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Since the BoSox and ChiSox won it, now it is the Cubs turn to take the Series. Go Cubs Go!
Posts: 3,685
This is a foolish decision on United's part. Does United want to race to the bottom with US?
chitownflyer is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:15 am
  #92  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,572
Originally Posted by as219
No offense, but I don't think UA will miss you too much...
The problem is that United doesn't really know which customers it will miss and which ones it needs to retain. Many employees just automatically assume all pax are not profitable for United and thus treat all pax with equal disdain.

Back to the OP - the memo is incredibly confusing, but it could be read to mean that PS C is downgrading from a choice of hot meals to complimentary BOB. That's pretty stunning for a product that costs upwards of $4,000. Even if it's not BOB, I've paid nearly $3,000 for C in a three class plane SFO-IAD. which will now offer a choice of a snack box or cold wrap/salad. Amazing.
rjque is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:17 am
  #93  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SOW
Programs: UA GS 5 MM, Delta 1.6MM & Hilton Diamond, Avis Chairman, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 768
Well I can say that if this is true, this GS will never buy another domestic Z or QUP fare, never!

If I can not get my special meal (which they already don't load a larger % of the time), I will either just spend the money other AA or CO or just burn all of the CR1s and 500 milers I have.

If this pans out to be true, I will be wring a letter to the GS staff and also recommending to my boss (who signs all corporate travel contracts for us) that we finally drop UA.

I know that last year my company spent over $15 mil on air travel with a large percentage going to UA. I know it will not cause UA to change, but at least it is finally changing my airline spending habits.
zambonisk is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:21 am
  #94  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington DC
Programs: QR: Gold; Marriott: Amb; UA: 1K; Taj: Silv
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by adambrau
Offering Two-Class Service on North America Three-Class Airplanes

• United First® service remains the same.

• A combined BOB service will be offered in United Business® (UB) and
United Economy® (UE).

•Customers in UB will receive complimentary beverages and BOB offering.
I did the bolding. This didn't seem too ambiguous to me. When you say that you're offering two class service, and you say that UF stays the same, and that UB and UE have a combined BOB service, it sees to me that UB has to buy. Either way, the concept of a complimentary BOB is an oxymoron.

Also, complimentary beverages worries me. Does that refer to alcoholic drinks being complimentary, or all beverages? Because the next logical step from that sentence is to assume that UE will be charged for all beverages.
Shounak is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:21 am
  #95  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by cbender
The value of upgrades (be it miles, or e500s) just dropped significantly for me if all they buy my on a IAD-LAX transcon is a bigger seat.
Why? It says they're "Offering Two-Class Service on North America Three-Class Airplanes."

What if they're doing like AA and selling C and Y as Y, and you'd get the C seat for free? In that case, I'm fine with BOB in the business cabin (sold as United Economy). Then if you want to upgrade, you can upgrade to F.

If this is what they're doing, this could be a win.

Clearly this items needs a lot more clarification as to how it's going to play out.
channa is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:22 am
  #96  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA 1K, AA 2MM, Bonvoy LT Plt, Mets fan
Posts: 5,073
PS C vs AA J

FWIW, the PS C soft product has been ahead of its competition -- AA's J product -- for a very long time.

It's been a year since I've flown PS in C, but the AA J meal service is as follows:

Bkfst: Choice of (a) omelet, meat hash & potatos, or (b) fruit & cereal, both served with bagel/biscuit, juice & coffee/tea. Fresh-baked cookie & chocolate before landing.

Lunch: Choice of (a) meat entree on a salad, or (b) chicken entree on a salad, served on a tray with a green salad and rolls (all at once; served from cart). Dessert is choice of (i) fruit & cheese plate, or (ii) pre-made ice cream sundae. Cookie/chocolate before landing.

Dinner: Salad & appetizer served from a cart, with rolls. Choice of (a) beef entree or (b) pasta entree, hand-delivered from the galley after salad. Dessert is choice of (i) fruit & cheese plate, or (ii) custom-made ice cream sundae. Cookie/chocolate before landing.

Redeye to JFK: Beverage service only.

So, even with these cuts, PS C still equals AA J.
CO FF is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:22 am
  #97  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Too many
Programs: Lots
Posts: 5,761
Another great example of UA's continuing war on its customers and revenue base. Those that still haven't jumped ship should hopefully see the light now.
Axey is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:23 am
  #98  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist, National EE
Posts: 253
Originally Posted by dcsnowwake
I know that BUT what happens when 25,000 of us decide to leave then?
Indeed. I'm in the same category as this poster, and I strongly suspect that in the real world (ie. outside of flyertalk) we're a much much bigger contingent than the 1K/GS crowd. I know a half dozen 1Ps, but no 1Ks.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I strongly suspect that a little loyalty from the mid-tier flyers is worth a whole lot more $$ to UA than a lot of loyalty from the top-tier flyers.
cbender is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:26 am
  #99  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Programs: UA 1K 1MM / AA PP, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 949
Originally Posted by FromYourFlightDeck
Folks,

We do not mean to cause additional controversy, but if you wish to cause change at United in the light of these idiotic decisions, there is a group of employees who will stand with you, and that is the pilots.

The pilots are committed to the removal of Glenn Tilton as the head of this airline, and his replacement with someone who actually understands the airline business. We cannot accomplish this alone.

We need to emphasize to you.. this is not a union vs. management issue.. this is a survival issue. Whether you are generally pro-union or pro-management, if you are pro-United, we need you to help us now.

The details are at GlennTilton.com, and there is a lot more coming in the next few weeks. But we need you onboard, please, as our partners in change.

Again, we do not wish to be the source of controversy, but we want to advise you that you do have options, and if you choose to stand up with us, we will effect positive change together.

[email protected]
Just thought I'd share my note submitted on the site...

Dear Mr. Tilton, I have been a Premier Executive frequent flier for years. Recently, I have seen United's service going down the tubes mainly due to cost cutting. I am now ready to walk away from United completely after the most recent service cuts, including the removal of snack service on morning p.s. business/first class and the announcement of buy-on-board replacing complementary hot meals on trans-atlantic flights. Your race to the bottom of the airline industry will not save the company. In fact, it is persuading frequent fliers like myself to book elsewhere. The thousands of dollars I spend each year on United will now go to your competitors unless these changes are revoked.

In addition, I do not believe your 'leadership' has done United any good after leaving bankruptcy. Please resign and let someone interested in saving United take the helm. You obviously don't know how to do it yourself.

One more frequent flier you're losing,
Clarkcc1
Clarkcc1 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:27 am
  #100  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SAN
Programs: UA 1MM/1K, HH Diamond
Posts: 6,832
Originally Posted by cbender
The value of upgrades (be it miles, or e500s) just dropped significantly for me if all they buy my on a IAD-LAX transcon is a bigger seat. The E+ seat is really big enough. Those of us who fly mostly or entirely domestic, and aren't located in NY just got the shaft. FWIW, my trips are about an even mix of business & leisure, but most of the miles come from business (transcon & Hawaii). I use miles to upgrade these flights more reliably than e500s.
Ok, so the value has dropped... But don't pretend that an int'l C seat is the same as E+.

I would gladly take the former without food over the latter with. Heck, I'd rather have the former without food than 2-class F with food.
as219 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:27 am
  #101  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington DC
Programs: QR: Gold; Marriott: Amb; UA: 1K; Taj: Silv
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by FromYourFlightDeck
I'd like to remain on topic as well, so let me simply offer this: We have the ability, working together, to cause the removal of Glenn Tilton. We have the power to tell United's Board of Directors what kind of airline experienced leader we want. We cannot make that appointment ourselves.
Right, I'm not disagreeing with this. I just want to know how you will roll back the changes outlined in this memo, once you effect the management change at the top.

Today's decision is a symptom of a sickness that pervades United. We want it removed before it kills the patient. If you believe that the status quo is better than a future without Glenn Tilton, we totally understand your decision to stay on the sidelines.
Again, I'm not arguing that United isn't basically on life support at this point. But here's the kicker...I don't have to believe that the status quo is better than a future without Glenn Tilton to stay on the sidelines. I will actively support someone - ANYONE - who outlines concrete solutions. And, sorry, I don't see that from any side at this point.
Shounak is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:28 am
  #102  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ANP
Programs: UA 1k, Marriott Plat, HH gold, Avis/Hertz Pres
Posts: 1,408
Originally Posted by Delta3MM
It's a cleaver ploy to get rid of a hub. I mean, I used to fly through IAD to take 947/946 to LA. Not any more.

Sometimes, I'd fly to IAD to take flights to Europe.

Not any more, I'll fly to ORD.

Sure, I may still fly UA, but I won't book 3 class transcons (and ua will see the demand slip, then get rid of them due to customer demands), and likewise will see demand drop out of IAD and reduce the flights there as well.

Next year, we'll see a whole slew of reduction of domestic capacity cuts into/out of IAD because of this. Then, the international reductions. Then no more IAD (except from ORD/JFK/DEN/SFO and LAX).

Sad, but going to happen.

What really gets my goat is I've already bought and upgraded flights on 3 class transcons just to get a good seat and meal, and now I would have picked a 757 just to get a good meal.

But, of course, since I bought a ticket, I can't change without penality. But they can change food service.

Not fair.

Billy
not going to happen, UA moved to IAD for a reason. once flying picks back up, IAD will have a new c councourse that will be united's only and will have more slots than the current. thats why they moved there, plus its cheaper that jfk
dcsnowwake is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:28 am
  #103  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SAN
Programs: UA 1MM/1K, HH Diamond
Posts: 6,832
Originally Posted by channa
What if they're doing like AA and selling C and Y as Y, and you'd get the C seat for free? In that case, I'm fine with BOB in the business cabin (sold as United Economy). Then if you want to upgrade, you can upgrade to F.
A handful of drink chits says they will not be selling domestic C for the price of Y...
as219 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:29 am
  #104  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Slightly to the left of center
Posts: 3,475
It really looks like UA is running out of options they can charge for.

The only thing they don't seem to be charging for is getting water from those faucets, connected to those old tanks, on the big birds.
DBCme is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2008, 9:30 am
  #105  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist, National EE
Posts: 253
Originally Posted by channa
Why? It says they're "Offering Two-Class Service on North America Three-Class Airplanes."

What if they're doing like AA and selling C and Y as Y, and you'd get the C seat for free? In that case, I'm fine with BOB in the business cabin (sold as United Economy). Then if you want to upgrade, you can upgrade to F.
I would also be fine with BOB in C, sold as Y, but I doubt that is what we will see.

Clearly this items needs a lot more clarification as to how it's going to play out.
Indeed. It is quite unclear if the BOB is complementary or just the beverages. If they intend BOB to be complementary, why switch to that at all? Catering those can't save them much less than the regular C catering. And they will still have to provide regular F catering (for now). I don't see where the cost savings are, unless they actually charge for BOB in C.
cbender is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.