![]() |
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Try looking at the ereceipt if you can and see what the fare class was |
Originally Posted by demkr
(Post 18173955)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Confirmed by MPSC: Reservations mistakenly confirmed in ON instead of R are posting as award reservations. Mystery solved as to why miles didn't post. On hold now as she is getting it fixed with the "other desk" If any one is in this situation and its been more than 5 days , i'd give the MPSC a call. It should show up in their computer as 0- tell them it was not an award fare and to look at ereceipt |
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Had the rudest agent i've encountered in yrs. first time i had to talk to a supe. She told me that indeed they resubmitted new fare class for credit. MPSC agent was beyond comprehension and hysterical. As for the ON waitlist thing, Insider stated an automatic fix was in progress. But since it was 2 class and ON, thats likely why they did not post. I am still a tad afraid that rez was screwed up b/c the past PNR receipt can no longer be reviewed. Sure hope to see the miles show up... And from the return trip too |
Originally Posted by demkr
(Post 18173955)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Confirmed by MPSC: Reservations mistakenly confirmed in ON instead of R are posting as award reservations. Mystery solved as to why miles didn't post. On hold now as she is getting it fixed with the "other desk" If any one is in this situation and its been more than 5 days , i'd give the MPSC a call. It should show up in their computer as 0- tell them it was not an award fare and to look at ereceipt I just called 1K line to xfer to MP ("there, and there, and there, and THERE!") and the nice agent fixed the same problem for me. (Pre 3/3 confirmed CPU that went to ON on 2-cabin, flew out as ON, no mileage credit.) wxguy, good point about the double usage of ON as standard award and biz->first upgrade... doesn't seem like that's going to work properly for mileage crediting. ----- BTW, was reading about the shrinking mileage between most city pairs on the other thread while holding, and I hear, "At United, we're making the world smaller!" LOL. |
Originally Posted by bznbuff
(Post 18174177)
[Call to 1k desk answered in 4 minutes...getting better there :)
Wow. I have been on hold on the "Premier" line for 92 minutes now and still running...I had 2 bulkhead seats for my wife and I (8A and B) on a 757 to Kona on Monday...they were there yesterday but now my wife has no seat...great....[/QUOTE] Wow. My only suggestion is to "tell" robo-voice that you are calling for a "new booking" not an "existing booking" (or whatever the right verbiage is). Anecdotaly, I have had much, much better luck that way. |
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
(Post 18172554)
1. I manage accounts for 5 total family members, and I'm staring at ~15 identical subject line ticket confirmation e-mails ("Travel Itinerary sent from United Airlines, Inc.). Can we please make the request to add in a first date of travel in order to make them more easily distinguishable at a glance? I recognize this is likely a programming change of some sort. FYI PMUA was able to incorporate this - just add in "for mm/dd/yyyy" in between "Itinerary" and "sent", or at the end of the subject line.
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Flyer215, glad i could be of help! I wish it was that easy for me on the phone...lol |
Originally Posted by demkr
(Post 18173955)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Confirmed by MPSC: Reservations mistakenly confirmed in ON instead of R are posting as award reservations. Mystery solved as to why miles didn't post. On hold now as she is getting it fixed with the "other desk" If any one is in this situation and its been more than 5 days , i'd give the MPSC a call. It should show up in their computer as 0- tell them it was not an award fare and to look at ereceipt For future reservations, they are planning to automatically fix the booking code (see the first post of this thread and the response thread). |
Checking Reserved Upgrades
On the former .bomb, you were able to check where your SWU and CR1s were applied to...whether it be reserved for a specific future flight or redeemed for a flight that has occurred. Can someone please point me to where I can find that in the new website? It's driving me nuts.
|
Please Modify the IVR for Keypad Entry
Dear UAInsider,
I don't know if this issue has been brought up amongst the myriad of concerns/complaints, but ever since the cutover, the interactive voice response system (IVR) is a total pain. It needs to have the ability to recognize keypad entries in lieu of voice response. The system recognizes my phone number from the database, and it asks to confirm if it is Luv2ctheworld. Either Yes or No in the form of a verbal response. It does not accept keypad entry (1 for Yes or 2 for No). The same issue applies when it is asking for the next question, domestic or international travel. Strangely, after that, keypad entries do work. The biggest problem, and one that wasted a lot of time trying to connect to the 1K line is that the voice response doesn't pick up verbal responses well in a noisy background (like an airport, when I most need it). So the system winds up not recognizing my answer because its too noisy, and it won't accept my keypad entry, and dumps me into the general call line, with a wait time of 30+ minutes. I have to find a quiet place somewhere to get connected (and the wait time was only a couple minutes on the elite line). Passengers and security look at you funny after yelling into the phone really loud YES YES YES. So, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE get this to the appropriate people... it's probably a simple setting to change on the IVR system. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by luv2ctheworld
(Post 18174640)
Dear UAInsider,
I don't know if this issue has been brought up amongst the myriad of concerns/complaints, but ever since the cutover, the interactive voice response system (IVR) is a total pain. It needs to have the ability to recognize keypad entries in lieu of voice response. The system recognizes my phone number from the database, and it asks to confirm if it is Luv2ctheworld. Either Yes or No in the form of a verbal response. It does not accept keypad entry (1 for Yes or 2 for No). The same issue applies when it is asking for the next question, domestic or international travel. Strangely, after that, keypad entries do work. The biggest problem, and one that wasted a lot of time trying to connect to the 1K line is that the voice response doesn't pick up verbal responses well in a noisy background (like an airport, when I most need it). So the system winds up not recognizing my answer because its too noisy, and it won't accept my keypad entry, and dumps me into the general call line, with a wait time of 30+ minutes. I have to find a quiet place somewhere to get connected (and the wait time was only a couple minutes on the elite line). Passengers and security look at you funny after yelling into the phone really loud YES YES YES. So, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE get this to the appropriate people... it's probably a simple setting to change on the IVR system. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by NickP 1K
(Post 18173436)
Tag your check in with NO/zero bags for now and go to the Premier line when you get to the airport; show your card from your * carrier and you will NOT be charged.
Thanks for your suggestion! |
Originally Posted by wxguy
(Post 18174226)
That's half the problem. The other half is that the new equivalent of upgrading from C to NF is *supposed* to book into ON. ON has two meanings: upgrade from paid C into 3-cabin F, as well as an award into two cabin F using "Standard" miles (the old CO EasyPass). It seems to me either the system will have to know the difference, or UACO will need to change one or the other's fare code.
|
Originally Posted by c1mth0g
(Post 18174780)
Isn't ON for saver 3-cabin F, not standard 3-cabin F? (I think standard 3-cabin F is something like FN?)
|
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
(Post 18174864)
You are correct - anything X/I/O (along with the xN versions) is at the cheaper saver levels, both for UA as well as *A flights
SaverPass Award Seats ON - Elite (Plat/1K/GS) SaverPass First Award O - Non-Elite and Low Elite SaverPass First Award IN - Elite (Plat/1K/GS) SaverPass Business Award I - Non-Elite and Low Elite SaverPass Business Award XN - Elite SaverPass Coach Award X - Non-Elite SaverPass Coach Award EasyPass Award Seats FN - EasyPass First Award JN - Elite/CC EasyPass Business Award ZN - Non-Elite EasyPass Business Award (tracks to the Z bucket) YN - Elite/CC EasyPass Coach Award HN - Non-Elite EasyPass Coach Award (tracks to the H bucket) Upgrade Awards ON - C->F on 3-cabin aircraft PN - B/M-Up for Elites (tracks to the P bucket) RN - Elite Upgrade to Business/Domestic F R - Non-Elite Upgrade to Business/Domestic F |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:28 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.