![]() |
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
(Post 33335241)
There was no real point in doing it before now. The wasn’t sufficient numbers of people wanting to travel until recently to make it economically viable for the airlines, in part influenced by the fact many other countries wouldn’t let U.K. travellers in.
Obviously that’s changed with many EU states opening up and the U.K. becomes somewhat of an outlier. I look forward though to the usual anti-restriction Brexiteers in the media making a case for EU alignment, whilst maintaining a straight face. plus there are a massive number of policy concerns that any major corporation has to consider before poking the bear. this latest extension may finally have made them say enough is enough, which frankly i more or less agree with wrt travel restrictions. i have always said i would imagine the govt to loosen restrictions once all 18+ were eligible for a jab and wow look at this leak. but i frankly cannot see any significant reason for NOT loosening travel restrictions in a month when this last phase is set to expire--including the absurdity of testing on return. either require testing from red only, and green/amber (if only they force a much lower market cost) or like every other country--remove testing for vaccinated travelers on return. |
Originally Posted by VSLover
(Post 33335262)
plus there are a massive number of policy concerns that any major corporation has to consider before poking the bear.
this latest extension may finally have made them say enough is enough, which frankly i more or less agree with wrt travel restrictions. i have always said i would imagine the govt to loosen restrictions once all 18+ were eligible for a jab and wow look at this leak. but i frankly cannot see any significant reason for NOT loosening travel restrictions in a month when this last phase is set to expire--including the absurdity of testing on return. either require testing from red only, and green/amber (if only they force a much lower market cost) or like every other country--remove testing for vaccinated travelers on return. happen there I wonder |
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
(Post 33335241)
There was no real point in doing it before now. The wasn’t sufficient numbers of people wanting to travel until recently to make it economically viable for the airlines, in part influenced by the fact many other countries wouldn’t let U.K. travellers in.
Obviously that’s changed with many EU states opening up and the U.K. becomes somewhat of an outlier. I look forward though to the usual anti-restriction Brexiteers in the media making a case for EU alignment, whilst maintaining a straight face. The legal challenge probably now makes sense that many more Britons are going to want to travel now that the EU is opening up. I wonder if the government is thinking about making travel easier because of the legal challenge or the economic aspect and more Britons wanting to travel. |
According to the Times, all over 18s in England will be called up (be able to book) for their jabs from tomorrow. This is fantastic news because if any adult can get their first jab next week, that means August we should be seeing close to 90% or above fully jabbed adults.
|
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33335311)
According to the Times, all over 18s in England will be called up (be able to book) for their jabs from tomorrow. This is fantastic news because if any adult can get their first jab next week, that means August we should be seeing close to 90% or above fully jabbed adults.
|
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33335295)
Yeh that is true. According to Sky News today, Jesse Norman, the financial secretary to the Treasury said "It's (the Government) looking at all the options. We don't want to be left behind by other countries that are taking a two-jab approach if it can be done safely."
The legal challenge probably now makes sense that many more Britons are going to want to travel now that the EU is opening up. I wonder if the government is thinking about making travel easier because of the legal challenge or the economic aspect and more Britons wanting to travel. |
Daily data:
Cases 11,007 (7,393 last Thursday) Deaths 19 (7) Patients admitted 173 (153 on the 6th) Patients in hospital 1,227 (1,048 on the 8th) Patients in ventilation beds 208 (159 on the 9th) People vaccinated up to and including 16 June 2021: First dose: 42,216,654 Second dose: 30,675,207 The rolling seven day daily average for cases is now up 33.7% on the previous week and the same measure for deaths is up 41.8%. The rolling 7 day daily average for deaths is 11.1 today. |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33335311)
According to the Times, all over 18s in England will be called up (be able to book) for their jabs from tomorrow. This is fantastic news because if any adult can get their first jab next week, that means August we should be seeing close to 90% or above fully jabbed adults.
|
Over 11,000 new cases reported today, the highest since mid-February. The 7-day rate per 100,000 is 75, one of the worst in Europe.
The demands that the UK government open up international travel may be becoming somewhat irrelevant, as at this rate no-one - other than a few countries willing to risk everything for the sake of tourist income - is going to let us in. If we want to travel again we have to get the number of cases down. |
Originally Posted by Misco60
(Post 33336012)
Over 11,000 new cases reported today, the highest since mid-February. The 7-day rate per 100,000 is 75, one of the worst in Europe.
The demands that the UK government open up international travel may be becoming somewhat irrelevant, as at this rate no-one - other than a few countries willing to risk everything for the sake of tourist income - is going to let us in. If we want to travel again we have to get the number of cases down. |
I don't suppose we will hear the phrase 'we need to protect what we have achieved' form the PM/senior ministers in relation to travel for while at least.
|
Originally Posted by Misco60
(Post 33336012)
Over 11,000 new cases reported today, the highest since mid-February. The 7-day rate per 100,000 is 75, one of the worst in Europe.
The demands that the UK government open up international travel may be becoming somewhat irrelevant, as at this rate no-one - other than a few countries willing to risk everything for the sake of tourist income - is going to let us in. If we want to travel again we have to get the number of cases down. |
Originally Posted by Misco60
(Post 33336012)
Over 11,000 new cases reported today, the highest since mid-February. The 7-day rate per 100,000 is 75, one of the worst in Europe.
The demands that the UK government open up international travel may be becoming somewhat irrelevant, as at this rate no-one - other than a few countries willing to risk everything for the sake of tourist income - is going to let us in. If we want to travel again we have to get the number of cases down. "Freedom day" as the media term it I think on the 19th of July is looking less and less likely sadly. I just don't get it. How have we managed to stuff this up and we have one of, if not the highest percentage of people vaccinated in Europe. |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33336071)
I'm one of the most vocal about travel being allowed, however, even I agree with this begrudgingly as it is true. I actually think we are now the second worst in Europe based on a rolling 7-day average.
"Freedom day" as the media term it I think on the 19th of July is looking less and less likely sadly. I just don't get it. How have we managed to stuff this up and we have one of, if not the highest percentage of people vaccinated in Europe. |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33336071)
"Freedom day" as the media term it I think on the 19th of July is looking less and less likely sadly. I just don't get it. How have we managed to stuff this up and we have one of, if not the highest percentage of people vaccinated in Europe.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:42 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.