FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Changes to xONEx Rule Sheet (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/983365-changes-xonex-rule-sheet.html)

jerry a. laska Sep 28, 2017 3:15 pm


Originally Posted by zoombee (Post 28868289)
I'm interested too - AA gave me the same response a few years ago. I was on a tight reticketing timeline so changed my route slightly instead but I *think* I've done a 2 domestic segment transit before (5+ years back if so).


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 28868366)
This has been discussed before in this forum
- whether the rule's wording "provided one is a transfer without without stopover" (my emphasis)
- means a single transfer of less than 24 hrs
- or multiple transfers each of which is less than 24hrs

Some have reported being allowed multiple transfers
but others have reported being refused

FWIW (very little:)) I have always been of the view that the rule means a single transfer

However, stex in your particular case AA175 and AA61 are your friends.
Each is a direct service MIA-NRT with a stop and plane change in DFW.
But for the purpose of a Oneworld Explorer they count as a single segment


Originally Posted by headinclouds (Post 28868962)
And Sarah, retired from AA and formerly the AA RTW guru, said that a connection without transfer means 1 city. Full stop.
The info that the rules in effect when purchased seems to dispel any notions of using new and 'better' rules when they are updated.


Originally Posted by JAXBA (Post 28869318)
That would have been BA's interpretation in my day too: one connection only. We would also have used the historic rules as filed in Amadeus or ATPCo.

Many years ago AA you could sometimes get the AA rtw desk to allow more than one flight in NA as a transit without stopover. But around 2007 or so they seemed to toughen up on this considerably. As I recall tickets books from some other sources could occasionally get more than one flight but I don't remember this being reported for some time.
See, for example:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/9108367-post7.html

pandaperth Sep 28, 2017 5:25 pm

Of course for new itineraries, this whole discussion on "transfer without stopover" is moot - the current rules (see post #461) have removed the words.

And so new itineraries allow multiple flight segments on each visit to each of the allowed 2nd visit continents and stopovers can be had on each visit too.

Dr. HFH Sep 28, 2017 7:20 pm


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 28868366)
... "provided one is a transfer without without stopover" (my emphasis)

From a plain English understanding, "a transfer" means one. Compare for clarity to "some transfers" "two transfers" "several transfers". Doesn't mean that you won't sometimes get more than one; but IMO the rule, itself, is pretty clear.

Calchas Sep 29, 2017 11:18 am

Yes and specifically a "transfer" in usual IATA language is one flight connecting to another flight. [But the flight need not be nonstop.]

stex Sep 29, 2017 5:44 pm

Thanks to all for the clarifications. And thanks very much pandaperth for suggesting flights AA175/AA61, they are ideal to solve my routing issue. Unfortunately, at this time both flights are only active until November 28, 2017. I need to fly them in June 2018. Just spoke with AA (both RTW desk and PLT desk) and they do not know whether it will be scheduled after November 28. I am not sure if they are considered seasonal flights and whether there is a predictable timeframe for when AA will confirm or not the extension of these flights... if any of you have some insights on this, please let me know.

One more question about transfer rules. The following is copied from the "Transfers" section of xONEx fare rules retrieved from ExpertFlyer:


IF THE FARE COMPONENT INCLUDES TRAVEL WITHIN EUROPE
VIA AFRICA.
AND
IF THE FARE COMPONENT INCLUDES TRAVEL WITHIN JAPAN /
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF KOREA / REPUBLIC OF KOREA/
SOUTHEAST ASIA VIA SOUTHWEST PACIFIC.
AND
IF THE FARE COMPONENT INCLUDES TRAVEL WITHIN NORTH
AMERICA VIA SOUTH AMERICA
.
7 TRANSFERS PERMITTED ON THE PRICING UNIT.
2 PERMITTED TRANSFERS BETWEEN DOMESTIC
FLIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT WITHIN THE
FARE ORIGIN COUNTRY WITHIN ANY NATION

1 PERMITTED TRANSFERS BETWEEN DOMESTIC
FLIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT IN HAWAII
7 PERMITTED IN PANAMA/CONTIGUOUS U.S.A./
CANADA/PUERTO RICO/US VIRGIN ISLANDS/ALASKA/
MEXICO/INTERNATIONAL POINTS IN THE CARIBBEAN
AREA/CENTRAL AMERICA.
What is the meaning of this excerpt? I was specifically confused about the bolded parts. The way I understood it, is that you could have 2 North American domestic flights as transfers when flying back from South America... but I am probably wrong/very confused, so any insights on this would be greatly appreciated…! Thanks!

beardoc Oct 4, 2017 2:16 pm

Massive new section on Transfers in the Rules. There are multiple of these but this is one condition:

IF THE FARE COMPONENT INCLUDES TRAVEL WITHIN AFRICA
VIA EUROPE.
AND
IF THE FARE COMPONENT INCLUDES TRAVEL WITHIN JAPAN /
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF KOREA / REPUBLIC OF KOREA/
SOUTHEAST ASIA VIA SOUTHWEST PACIFIC.
AND
IF THE FARE COMPONENT INCLUDES TRAVEL WITHIN NORTH
AMERICA VIA SOUTH AMERICA.
5 TRANSFERS PERMITTED ON THE PRICING UNIT.
NONE PERMITTED IN LIBYA
2 PERMITTED TRANSFERS BETWEEN DOMESTIC
FLIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT WITHIN THE
FARE ORIGIN COUNTRY WITHIN ANY NATION
5 PERMITTED IN AFRICA.
FARE BREAK SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE FARE
COMPONENT PROVIDED -
FARE BREAK POINTS IN MIDDLE EAST - OTHER POINT
MIDDLE EAST/UNITED STATES - OTHER POINT CANADA/
CANADA - OTHER POINT UNITED STATES/HKG - OTHER
POINT CHINA/CHINA - OTHER POINT HKG/MALAYSIA -
OTHER POINT SIN/SIN - OTHER POINT MALAYSIA/AFRICA
- OTHER POINT AFRICA/MALDIVES - OTHER POINT SRI
LANKA/SRI LANKA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES/MALDIVES -
OTHER POINT INDIA/INDIA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES
DOMESTIC -
DESTINATION FARE BREAK POINTS.
EMBEDDED SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE FARE
COMPONENT WITHIN AREA 1 WITHIN AREA 2 WITHIN AREA 3
BETWEEN AREA 2 AND AREA 3 BETWEEN AREA 3 AND AREA 2.
AND - 7 TRANSFERS PERMITTED ON THE PRICING UNIT.
1 PERMITTED TRANSFERS BETWEEN DOMESTIC
FLIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT IN HAWAII
7 PERMITTED IN PANAMA/CONTIGUOUS U.S.A./
CANADA/PUERTO RICO/US VIRGIN ISLANDS/
ALASKA/
MEXICO/INTERNATIONAL POINTS IN THE
CARIBBEAN
AREA/CENTRAL AMERICA.
FARE BREAK SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE
FARE COMPONENT PROVIDED -
FARE BREAK POINTS IN MIDDLE EAST - OTHER POINT
MIDDLE EAST/UNITED STATES - OTHER POINT CANADA/
CANADA - OTHER POINT UNITED STATES/HKG - OTHER
POINT CHINA/CHINA - OTHER POINT HKG/MALAYSIA -
OTHER POINT SIN/SIN - OTHER POINT MALAYSIA/
AFRICA
- OTHER POINT AFRICA/MALDIVES - OTHER POINT SRI
LANKA/SRI LANKA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES/MALDIVES
-
OTHER POINT INDIA/INDIA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES
DOMESTIC -
DESTINATION FARE BREAK POINTS.
EMBEDDED SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE FARE
COMPONENT WITHIN AREA 1 WITHIN AREA 2 WITHIN
AREA 3 BETWEEN AREA 2 AND AREA 3 BETWEEN AREA 3
AND AREA 2.
AND - UNLIMITED TRANSFERS PERMITTED ON THE PRICING
UNIT.
NONE PERMITTED IN PANAMA
NONE PERMITTED IN MAURITIUS/SOUTH AFRICA
2 PERMITTED AT VIA POINTS BETWEEN UNITED
KINGDOM ALBANIA/BULGARIA/CYPRUS/ALGERIA/
GREECE/CROATIA/MOROCCO/ROMANIA/RUSSIA/
TUNISIA/TURKEY/UKRAINE/MIDDLE EAST
5 PERMITTED IN LIBYA/EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST
5 PERMITTED IN SOUTH AMERICA
5 PERMITTED IN SOUTHWEST PACIFIC
5 PERMITTED IN AREA 3.
FARE BREAK SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE
FARE COMPONENT PROVIDED -
FARE BREAK POINTS IN MIDDLE EAST - OTHER POINT
MIDDLE EAST/UNITED STATES - OTHER POINT CANADA/
CANADA - OTHER POINT UNITED STATES/HKG - OTHER
POINT CHINA/CHINA - OTHER POINT HKG/MALAYSIA -
OTHER POINT SIN/SIN - OTHER POINT MALAYSIA/
AFRICA
- OTHER POINT AFRICA/MALDIVES - OTHER POINT SRI
LANKA/SRI LANKA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES/MALDIVES
-
OTHER POINT INDIA/INDIA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES
DOMESTIC -
DESTINATION FARE BREAK POINTS.
EMBEDDED SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE FARE
COMPONENT WITHIN AREA 1 WITHIN AREA 2 WITHIN
AREA 3 BETWEEN AREA 2 AND AREA 3 BETWEEN AREA 3
AND AREA 2.
AND - 4 TRANSFERS PERMITTED ON THE PRICING UNIT.
NONE PERMITTED IN MAURITIUS/SOUTH AFRICA
1 PERMITTED AT CONNECTIONS IN JAPAN /
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF KOREA / REPUBLIC OF
KOREA/SOUTHEAST ASIA/SOUTH ASIAN
SUBCONTINENT/RUSSIAN FEDERATION EAST OF
URALS
1 PERMITTED AT CONNECTIONS IN PANAMA/
NORTH
AMERICA/INTERNATIONAL POINTS IN THE
CARIBBEAN AREA/CENTRAL AMERICA
1 PERMITTED AT CONNECTIONS IN EUROPE
1 PERMITTED AT CONNECTIONS AT VIA POINTS
BETWEEN AFRICA AREA 1/AREA 3.
FARE BREAK SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE
FARE COMPONENT PROVIDED -
FARE BREAK POINTS IN MIDDLE EAST - OTHER POINT
MIDDLE EAST/UNITED STATES - OTHER POINT CANADA/
CANADA - OTHER POINT UNITED STATES/HKG - OTHER
POINT CHINA/CHINA - OTHER POINT HKG/MALAYSIA -
OTHER POINT SIN/SIN - OTHER POINT MALAYSIA/
AFRICA
- OTHER POINT AFRICA/MALDIVES - OTHER POINT SRI
LANKA/SRI LANKA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES/MALDIVES
-
OTHER POINT INDIA/INDIA - OTHER POINT MALDIVES
DOMESTIC -
DESTINATION FARE BREAK POINTS.
EMBEDDED SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE FARE
COMPONENT WITHIN AREA 1 WITHIN AREA 2 WITHIN
AREA 3 BETWEEN AREA 2 AND AREA 3 BETWEEN AREA 3
AND AREA 2.
This is only one of the new conditions. There are many more in the same section.

I'm still trying to get my head around what the huge list of fare break points and permitted transfers means. How does an xONEx fare have fare break points and routing?

Calchas Oct 4, 2017 2:51 pm


Originally Posted by beardoc (Post 28894168)
Massive new section on Transfers in the Rules. There are multiple of these but this is one condition:


This is only one of the new conditions. There are many more in the same section.

I'm still trying to get my head around what the huge list of fare break points and permitted transfers means. How does an xONEx fare have fare break points and routing?

This was inserted some time ago (a few months at least) to allow Sabre to autoprice xONEx itineraries. It is in APTCO language. The rules are generated by a computer, for another computer to read. They are not intended to be human readable.

The xONEx product allows the start and end cities to differ. This is only allowed domestically and between certain countries. But all the fares are published as XXX-XXX (i.e., back to the same city). So to get around that, formally speaking you have a surface sector at the end of your itinerary joining the finally visited city with the fare destination. This is called a “fare break surface sector” because it occurs at a fare break point. Fare break surface sectors are usually disallowed because they increase the complexity of itinerary pricing so much if you have to consider fares for non-visited cities as part of your pricing calculation. Nonetheless, they are required here.

The xONEx product also has very unusual transfer allowances (a certain number in each continent, you can go through the same city multiple times but only fly the same pair of cities once in the same direction): again, because it is unusual, there is no short cut in the ATPCO language, it all has to be expressed explicitly.

So that’s why it’s so long and incomprehensible.

I have no doubt it is full of exploitable mistakes, if someone looks carefully enough. :)

beardoc Oct 5, 2017 12:40 am


Originally Posted by Calchas (Post 28894312)
This was inserted some time ago (a few months at least) to allow Sabre to autoprice xONEx itineraries. It is in APTCO language. The rules are generated by a computer, for another computer to read. They are not intended to be human readable.

The xONEx product allows the start and end cities to differ. This is only allowed domestically and between certain countries. But all the fares are published as XXX-XXX (i.e., back to the same city). So to get around that, formally speaking you have a surface sector at the end of your itinerary joining the finally visited city with the fare destination. This is called a “fare break surface sector” because it occurs at a fare break point. Fare break surface sectors are usually disallowed because they increase the complexity of itinerary pricing so much if you have to consider fares for non-visited cities as part of your pricing calculation. Nonetheless, they are required here.

The xONEx product also has very unusual transfer allowances (a certain number in each continent, you can go through the same city multiple times but only fly the same pair of cities once in the same direction): again, because it is unusual, there is no short cut in the ATPCO language, it all has to be expressed explicitly.

So that’s why it’s so long and incomprehensible.

I have no doubt it is full of exploitable mistakes, if someone looks carefully enough. :)

Ah, thank you very much. I was getting worried as I've been ignoring the xONEx fares, but now I have to book one for next week, and I was trying to get my head around those rules to see if there were any surprises!

If it's just to codify for autopricing then that's fine.

Gardyloo Oct 21, 2017 12:28 pm

I'm making this thread a sticky.

Gardyloo
Oneworld moderator

pandaperth Nov 4, 2017 1:32 am

2017-Oct-30 New Version of the Rule Sheet (Minor Changes only)
 
2017-Oct-30 New Version of the Rule Sheet (Minor Changes only)

Using diffchecker, the only changes appear to be:
  • An improved (IMHO) look to the rule sheet
  • The removal of Air Berlin (it has gone bust)
  • In Section 5 Reservations and Ticketing:

    Reservations for the first overwater flight and all preceding flights must be made prior to departure.
    has been changed to

    Reservations for the first international flight and all preceding flights must be made prior to departure.
  • Various minor editing (for example "&" changed to "and"; "First class" changed to "First Class")

Moomba Nov 4, 2017 2:38 am


Originally Posted by pandaperth (Post 29016714)
2017-Oct-30 New Version of the Rule Sheet (Minor Changes only)

Using diffchecker, the only changes appear to be:
  • An improved (IMHO) look to the rule sheet
  • The removal of Air Berlin (it has gone bust)
  • In Section 5 Reservations and Ticketing:

    has been changed to
  • Various minor editing (for example "&" changed to "and"; "First class" changed to "First Class")

Also accompanied by a D price hike ex SA on the same day. Not sure about other origins / classes.

ajnaro Jan 4, 2018 7:23 am

Are the following rules about no stop-over still on the books: 1) upon second entry in North America coming from South America, 2) upon second entry in Europe coming from South Africa?

ajnaro Jan 5, 2018 2:51 pm


Originally Posted by ajnaro (Post 29248827)
Are the following rules about no stop-over still on the books: 1) upon second entry in North America coming from South America, 2) upon second entry in Europe coming from South Africa?

I can now answer my own question, at least about North America. I tried making a new booking with the AA around the world desk. It contains two entries to North America: one from HND and the other from GIG. Two different agents, both of whom I knew from previous interactions, insisted that one of these entries would have to be without stop-over. Finally, I asked one of them to check with the rate desk and the answer that came back was something like ‘we have to allow two stop-overs because of the wording of the rule’. From that, I conclude that the current version of the rule is the one given in post #461 above.

Calchas Jan 6, 2018 8:36 am


Originally Posted by ajnaro (Post 29248827)
Are the following rules about no stop-over still on the books: 1) upon second entry in North America coming from South America, 2) upon second entry in Europe coming from South Africa?

I don't believe so.

Code:

          E. ONLY ONE INTERCONTINENTAL DEPARTURE AND ONE
            INTERCONTINENTAL ARRIVAL PERMITTED IN EACH
            CONTINENT EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS -
            1. TWO PERMITTED IN NORTH AMERICA.
            2. TWO PERMITTED IN ASIA WHEN ONE IS FOR TRAVEL
              BETWEEN THE SOUTHWEST PACIFIC AND
              EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST.
            3. TWO PERMITTED IN EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST FOR
              TRAVEL TO/FROM/VIA AFRICA. IF TRAVEL IS
              TO/FROM EUROPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS ITINERARY
              MAY NOT INCLUDE MAURITIUS/SOUTH AFRICA.
                ---


Originally Posted by ajnaro (Post 29255199)
I can now answer my own question, at least about North America. I tried making a new booking with the AA around the world desk. It contains two entries to North America: one from HND and the other from GIG. Two different agents, both of whom I knew from previous interactions, insisted that one of these entries would have to be without stop-over. Finally, I asked one of them to check with the rate desk and the answer that came back was something like ‘we have to allow two stop-overs because of the wording of the rule’. From that, I conclude that the current version of the rule is the one given in post #461 above.

There may be a subtlety: if your journey begins in the USA, you may not have a stopover on your second entry.

Code:

          F.ONLY ONE INTERNATIONAL DEPARTURE AND ONE
            INTERNATIONAL ARRIVAL TO/FROM THE COUNTRY OF
            ORIGIN PERMITTED - EXCEPTION TWO PERMITTED FOR
            ORIGIN USA WHEN ONE ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE IS A
            TRANSFER WITHOUT STOPOVER.
            NOTE - TRAVEL BETWEEN US AND CANADA IS NOT
            COUNTED AS INTERNATIONAL.
            NOTE - NO MORE THAN 4 INTERNATIONAL TRANSFERS
          FROM THE ONE COUNTRY PERMITTED.


beardoc Feb 5, 2018 7:23 am

Is it just something I missed or has a very large MPM routing table been added to the xONEx fares? I was looking at the routing page in EF for the xONEx fare ex-JNB and discovered a massive MPM table with 499 options!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:03 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.