![]() |
Originally Posted by Leo123
(Post 28712855)
I went to the HK city center emerald/first check-in counter (where the airport express train is) and had zero problems. Got baggage checked only to MAD and no questions about SSG visa. Thank you once again for your help!
|
CX won't get any problems for taking someone to MAD who has the right to enter there. I fail to see why this was ever likely to be an issue - airlines only care about circumstances in which they might have to take someone back again at their expense.
|
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 28713028)
I fail to see why this was ever likely to be an issue
Also, he had a connection to SSG, so it would be normal to enquire into the visa situation even if he was passing through a country where he was a resident. |
The airline only cares about their revenue risk. If there's no risk in taking him to MAD then they'll be happy to do it, curiosity notwithstanding. And OK, but how many people posting on these forums need a visa for Spain? Less than 5% I guess.
|
I am looking to book a LONE4 originatingin London, booked through BA (as I am trying to hit the $20k spend on a BAChase signature Visa) and in the UK as the £ price is cheaper than the $ price,the card has no foreign transaction fees and it’s originating in the UK anyway.
I have the itinerary pretty muchnailed down using the online tool. One stumbling block is the HTI-SYD leg,which shows no L availability on the dates I need to travel (very littleflexibility due to vacation constraints). On ExpertFlyer I can see that thereis L availability, but only with the USA point of sale. Wondering if anyone is aware how flexiblethe airlines are on the point of sale is for these explorer tickets or if thereare any workarounds?
Thanks in advance |
Originally Posted by Olas86
(Post 28722483)
I am looking to book a LONE4 originatingin London, booked through BA (as I am trying to hit the $20k spend on a BAChase signature Visa) and in the UK as the £ price is cheaper than the $ price,
For GBP/USD, outside of unusual circumstances, the rate should not be more than a few percentage points away from the spot rate, and within the margin of error of Visa/MC/Amex's exchange rates. Are you making a big saving this way? On ExpertFlyer I can see that thereis L availability, but only with the USA point of sale. Could I book a UKoriginating itinerary through BA in the US? Did you send your original request via a US office? Or did you call BA in Manchester on their UK telephone number? And if so, would that count as US POS but still be the £price converted to $? |
Originally Posted by Olas86
(Post 28722483)
One stumbling block is the HTI-SYD leg,which shows no L availability on the dates I need to travel (very littleflexibility due to vacation constraints). On ExpertFlyer I can see that thereis L availability, but only with the USA point of sale.
My suggestion is to either call AA or call the U.S. BA number and if they can see the inventory, have them book it. If AA books it, they can price it in GBP. |
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 28722865)
You could book with AA
|
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 28722994)
Sounds to me like Olas86 wants the spend to go to BA so that it qualifies a bonus under her/his credit card.
Yes - that is correct. Ideally I would like to book through BA for the triple Avios. Realize now that I wasn't being clear before - when I referred to £ or $ price I meant UK or US DONE4 price. Currency doesn't really matter due to the no foreign transaction fees I guess what I really want is a BA US point of sale but the UK price. Sounds like calling the BA number in the US is the best bet (thanks anabolism) What is a married segment rule? |
Originally Posted by Olas86
(Post 28723026)
What is a married segment rule?
For instance, consider going from DXB to SYD to WLG. Looking at this as a through journey, the availability on a random date is as follows: Code:
QF 2 DXBSYD 01SEP 0915 0510+1 F1 A0 J0 C0 D0 I0 W2 R0 T0 Y9 B9 H9 K9 M6 L0Searching for QF 2 on DXB-SYD (on its own) gives Code:
QF 2 DXBSYD 01SEP 0915 0510+1 F6 A0 J9 C9 D3 I0 W5 R0 T0 Y9 B9 H9 K9 M9 L9Code:
QF 161 SYDWLG 02SEP 0935 1445 J1 C0 D0 I0 Y9 B9 H9 K9 M0 L0Obviously this only applies if the flights are connected, that is, within 24 hours of each other. |
I don't think that is the case here. These are the two sets of results - firstly with US point of sale, secondly with UK point of sale.
Results from https://www.ExpertFlyer.com Code:
Flight Availability SearchCode:
Flight Availability Search |
There is another alternative if the major goal is to get a ticket issued.
Set HTI-SYD up as a surface segment and buy a local ticket in whatever fare class is available on the QF Australia site. Happy wandering Fred |
Originally Posted by wandering_fred
(Post 28723306)
Set HTI-SYD up as a surface segment and buy a local ticket in whatever fare class is available on the QF Australia site.
Some additional question now that this is becoming a reality - Once booked, will the entire itinerary be available on my BA executive club account and will I be able to select seats from there? Or will I need to go to the website for the operator of each segment? And as a OWE, are there any seats that aren't available for selection? eg. bassinet seats? Looks like I am going to have segments on QF, MH, JL, AA and BA if anyone is aware of any specific restrictions? |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 28713028)
CX won't get any problems for taking someone to MAD who has the right to enter there. I fail to see why this was ever likely to be an issue - airlines only care about circumstances in which they might have to take someone back again at their expense.
The IATA rule is, where entry is refused, the final inbound carrier is responsible for ticketing the passenger to whatever place is directed by the authorities. If the passenger has no unflown flight coupons left on his inbound ticket, and refuses to pay for the outbound ticket, then all carriers who participated in the inbound carriage (from the previous stopover, up to the place where entry is refused) share the cost of that new ticket. That cost is shared on a pro-rate basis. Since HKG-MAD is much longer than MAD-SSH, and there was a connection at MAD not a stopover, it seems to me that CX would be on the hook by IATA's rules even if IB dropped the ball by allowing the passenger on board at MAD. Anyway, just an interesting technical point. :) |
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 28731050)
Anyway, just an interesting technical point. :)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.