![]() |
I had problems with CA and MO this afternoon, as well as uploading VR to MVD this evening. I first thought that I had been shut down. I just talked with a MVD agent over the phone. She said that their IT has been working "furiously" on the system problems all this evening, and my status is "active". All money is there.
|
Originally Posted by Nelumbo
(Post 21747291)
I had problems with CA and MO this afternoon, as well as uploading VR to MVD this evening. I first thought that I had been shut down. I just talked with a MVD agent over the phone. She said that their IT has been working "furiously" on the system problems all this evening, and my status is "active". All money is there.
question: did they indicate that IT was working to fix the CA issues? that's of prime importance to me. |
Originally Posted by TheChallenge
(Post 21747225)
The error code 57 is error in processing, try again in a few mins.
http://www.authorize.net/support/mer...eason_Text.htm How long ago did you try? Mine still shows as active as well, but I just attempted to do a CA and it didn't go through. It came back with an error code the bank manager had never even seen before, but different than 57. I'm guessing it was an error code specific to CAs. I'm wondering if there are currently problems going on at MVDs end. |
Originally Posted by Happy
(Post 21746825)
Only to a couple persons who just suffered that. AFAIK, right in the past few days, there were CAs being done, in far greater amount. Nothing happened.
CA itself does not seem to be the particular trigger. We are all just guessing and speculating but in all reality, it could be something totally unrelated. Who knows. |
Originally Posted by Nelumbo
(Post 21747291)
I had problems with CA and MO this afternoon, as well as uploading VR to MVD this evening. I first thought that I had been shut down. I just talked with a MVD agent over the phone. She said that their IT has been working "furiously" on the system problems all this evening, and my status is "active". All money is there.
|
Originally Posted by makinbutter
(Post 21747335)
i tried to CA at two different banks this afternoon. i thought there might've been an issue. good to see someone has already looked into it.
question: did they indicate that IT was working to fix the CA issues? that's of prime importance to me. |
I got hit as well.
My vanilla not working for the first time, tried to do CA at US Bank and no go. |
I've had MVD for a while but haven't touched it. Loaded $2500 yesterday and $2500 just today (right after midnight). Works now ... now to figure out how to liquidate safely :)
|
Originally Posted by Barry2013
(Post 21745196)
Are all the shut downs associated with CA's or were some for debit PIN transactions? I haven't done any CA's yet.
Originally Posted by prasha11
(Post 21745241)
Cannot log in.
If I do not care to reopen the account, will they mail me the check for balance and close the account? anyone has done this? I don't like when anyone takes over the control of my money, struggle to get it back? happened with WF, tired, not worth the MS. VR-BB in that respect seems OK The CFPB regulates nonbanks that provide financial services as well, and I'd imagine with prepaid card products such as this which are targeted towards exploiting the underbanked by charging them lots of fees, the CFPB would be eager to get involved and the card issuers would be even less eager to antagonize them. As others mentioned above, they may unlock your account and allow you to withdraw the balance via a cash advance if you call, which is probably the best outcome for you as you could get the money back the same day. I've also seen reports earlier in this thread that whatever the phone reps may say, the $9.95 fee for a check won't be charged if the account closure was initiated by them rather than you. But if they are uncooperative, a CFPB complaint may make any delay or fees in getting your money back magically disappear.
Originally Posted by Happy
(Post 21746313)
Does not make any difference. They make more money at $1.95 per transaction on CA versus the debit card transaction at $0.50 only.
I don't know why you think it makes no difference whether you CA or not. No one knows what exactly triggers a shutdown, and it may vary ("our chief weapon is surprise, surprise and fear, fear and surprise"), but I've read most of the posts in this thread and it seems that a common element between everyone who got shut down is cash advances. Some people get away with larger amounts for a longer period of time, some are shut down faster. But they all liquidated the funds they loaded by CA. And unlike MO purchases where there's no easy way for them to know what you bought at WM or the grocery store, it's trivial for them to write an algorithm which looks for people who just load the cards and cash advance the funds out. As I told Barry2013, I'd be very interested to see an example of someone who got shut down for only MO purchases. |
Is there any advantage to purchasing a temporary MVD card at CVS versus simply ordering one on the Vanilla website, and then loading it with VR cards once the permanent card is received in the mail?
|
Just successfully CA 5K+ this morning.
|
Originally Posted by TTT103
(Post 21749253)
Is there any advantage to purchasing a temporary MVD card at CVS versus simply ordering one on the Vanilla website, and then loading it with VR cards once the permanent card is received in the mail?
|
Originally Posted by rgar7
(Post 21749752)
Nope. Just save yourself the fee and order online :)
|
Originally Posted by rgar7
(Post 21749752)
Nope. Just save yourself the fee and order online :)
Ive only gotten mine @ CV and loaded $500 each time |
Originally Posted by Nelumbo
(Post 21749666)
Just successfully CA 5K+ this morning.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.