![]() |
Originally Posted by MikeFromTokyo
(Post 25562561)
Practically speaking I don't think it is likely that an hotel would go to the trouble of blocking award inventory and then turn around and make P+C available. But of course since the hotels are not even strictly bound to the T&C, ANY availability scenario is theoretically possible.
|
Originally Posted by Colin
(Post 25563408)
Hotels get more revenue on a P+C award booking than an All-Points award booking in all cases except where the hotel is near or actually sold-out.
I once was mistakenly given the GP portion of a bill when I stayed at a sold out property. The hotel received what I assumed was close to the ADR - around $200/night - when BAR was probably around $250 or so. If it is true that hotels receive more recenue from P+C, that shows just how little they must receive for award rooms in most cases. |
Originally Posted by MikeFromTokyo
(Post 25562157)
Since P+C is a more restricted type of award inventory than standard point only award inventory, it would seem illogical for it to be available in the absence of regular award availability.
|
Originally Posted by MikeFromTokyo
(Post 25563544)
How much do hotels typically receive in compensation when they are NOT sold out or nearly sold out?
I once was mistakenly given the GP portion of a bill when I stayed at a sold out property. The hotel received what I assumed was close to the ADR - around $200/night - when BAR was probably around $250 or so. If it is true that hotels receive more recenue from P+C, that shows just how little they must receive for award rooms in most cases. |
Originally Posted by sethb
(Post 25563792)
People have posted elsewhere about how much hotels get for points stays when not near full. The amounts seem to be in the $20-$50 range, probably just over the marginal cost of servicing the room. (Since people who earn status tend to be the ones with more points, the cost of all their perks is included in that amount.)
I'm afraid I have no polite way to express how much I doubt that. |
Originally Posted by sethb
(Post 25563780)
I don't see anywhere in the T+C that says anything about logic.
Full points award is equal to base (and sometimes better than base) room availability at HDR. This is just a matter of fact requiring no further explanation. C&P award availability is often less than the base room availability at HDR. Again, easy to check with a quick call to HGP helpdesk. Therefore, it's not a challenging logical jump to conclude that C&P availability is more restricted than full award availability. |
Originally Posted by stargold
(Post 25564673)
You don't need to see the T&C for something that can easily be checked in terms of outcome/manifestation.
Full points award is equal to base (and sometimes better than base) room availability at HDR. This is just a matter of fact requiring no further explanation. C&P award availability is often less than the base room availability at HDR. Again, easy to check with a quick call to HGP helpdesk. Therefore, it's not a challenging logical jump to conclude that C&P availability is more restricted than full award availability. |
Originally Posted by sethb
(Post 25567005)
You can conclude anything you want. That doesn't make it true, and if you complain to Hyatt that your conclusion failed, they aren't likely to care. If the T+C said that points rooms are available whenever P+C rooms are available, and you could get P+C but not points, then they'd care and probably get you the room on points.
Are you disputing that P&C is a more restricted inventory compared to full award? Or a step further, are you trying to say that C&P is a less restricted inventory compared to full award? |
Originally Posted by stargold
(Post 25567502)
Quite honestly, I have lost track of the point you're trying to make.
Are you disputing that P&C is a more restricted inventory compared to full award? Or a step further, are you trying to say that C&P is a less restricted inventory compared to full award? |
Originally Posted by hailstorm
(Post 25567578)
We are saying that there's not enough information to say definitively one way or the other.
|
Originally Posted by Frindle
(Post 25567816)
I think you're trying too hard to prove you're right when everyone here knows you're not.
|
+1; you nailed it !!
Quote: Originally Posted by hailstorm We are saying that there's not enough information to say definitively one way or the other.
Originally Posted by Frindle
(Post 25567816)
I think you're trying too hard to prove you're right when everyone here knows you're not.
|
Ok - stop with the bickering.
From my take there really isn't a correlation - awards are supposed to be available if the base entry room is available for revenue stays. P&C is at the property's discretion - can be offered on upgraded rooms (as reported here in the forum) or opted out completely. So P&C availability is not easily predictable. Peteropny - co-mod - Hyatt |
Originally Posted by peteropny
(Post 25568637)
Ok - stop with the bickering.
From my take there really isn't a correlation - awards are supposed to be available if the base entry room is available for revenue stays. P&C is at the property's discretion - can be offered on upgraded rooms (as reported here in the forum) or opted out completely. So P&C availability is not easily predictable. Peteropny - co-mod - Hyatt http://viewfromthewing.boardingarea....-best-resorts/ |
Originally Posted by stargold
(Post 25567502)
Quite honestly, I have lost track of the point you're trying to make.
Are you disputing that P&C is a more restricted inventory compared to full award? Or a step further, are you trying to say that C&P is a less restricted inventory compared to full award? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.