That's generally fine - the point is one understands the concepts. References exist for a reason. Best of luck.

Let's say that I started in the 220's on July 27 ... Goal by the end of year (e.g. December 2009) was to get below 200 (the round number). And the more immediate goal was to get well below Alli weight before ZRH (my birthday).

:D
/25 is half of a /24 and /26 half of that :D

but alas, I deal with this daily and know it like the back of my hand, its easy to come by after you get used to it.

Half - 1? I had forgotten that completely.

more dumbest criminals :D
http://www.reporternews.com/news/200...s-bank-robbed/

It depends, per specs and most switches it is -1, but certain extreme switches allow you to manipulate the subnets and not need the normal gateway ip and broadcast IP....however it makes for a PAIN when you switch to cisco or other switches as I know first hand.

This is why enterprise rollouts should be based on standards and not vendor suggestions. :)

Rule 1 when dealing with popos. Say nothing. Admit nothing.

Looks like the Austin W is the latest SPG property to have financing issues:

http://www.statesman.com/business/co...11stratus.html

I'm still fond of the criminal getting hit in the trachea by the security wall. I know - I've posted that previously but the sequence that starts 55 seconds in still makes me laugh.

Let's just say I did my MCP on NT 4 and have been out of tech for 6 years. I would be next to useless in networking.

Awesome.

Oh yea I know, and luckily our subnets were fully compliant using cisco gear from the start, but we merged some other companies gear into ours and their ip space, it was :rolleyes: At the end of the day had to dedicated almost an entire /24(actually containing smaller subnets) extra in 'overhead' to clear up the servers that were IPless with the changes done.

My dog eats her vomit. :o I do not know what it smells like.


Hmmmmmmmm.:confused:

:D

Of COURSE you are!!


Fingers crossed!!!:cool:

Rule 2 - don't tattoo your cr:rolleyes:tch.