|
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 12196314)
Hello Kitty plane set on Flickr.
Set your :rolleyes: to stun. Grab another beer, here comes youtube into the mix.
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 12196384)
Ahhh...the glory of living in PA. :rolleyes:
It used to be OK when they still bothered to sell everclear, but now that isn't even available so it makes me question the whole damn thing.
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196393)
Beautiful. Teh Whore just explained to me why she wouldn't return to me the $15K engagement ring. Enjoy teh Brazilian Soap-Opera... :-:
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196410)
I am about ready to report the ring as stolen to USAA, and let her take up the matter with the Louisiana Medical Board...
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196441)
I'm getting my :-:teen Thousand $ back, :-:damnit. Ho ain't cheatin' me out of a good chunk of my life's earnings (sorry, I be po...)
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196467)
FWIW, ALCO is seriously pissed-off. :-:
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196478)
Annulment ordered first, then argue conditional gift... :-:
Facts are on my side... I will win at all stages. |
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196493)
Theft is theft. I haven't paid $75/month to USAA for nothing...
|
Just finished watching the Parent Trap with BL JR. The remake when Lindsay Lohan could act (and while not Natasha Richardson's best role, made me miss her). BL JR and I are going to have a slumber party now. I'm hoping this actually results in slumber. Good night box!
|
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196493)
Theft is theft. I haven't paid $75/month to USAA for nothing...
|
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 12196519)
Just be careful how you tread. You don't want anything to bit you in the ... because you didn't follow some stupid procedure and she keeps the ring.
IMHO you want to let her know that you know the law is on your side and that her disposal/loss of the ring is unlawful. Is she fighting the annulment? Are you on good terms with any of the members of her family so you could pass on "helpful" advice regarding this? |
Originally Posted by baglady
(Post 12196517)
Just finished watching the Parent Trap with BL JR. The remake when Lindsay Lohan could act (and while not Natasha Richardson's best role, made me miss her). BL JR and I are going to have a slumber party now. I'm hoping this actually results in slumber. Good night box!
|
Originally Posted by xyzzy
(Post 12196528)
^ +1 ^
IMHO you want to let her know that you know the law is on your side and that her disposal/loss of the ring is unlawful. Is she fighting the annulment? Are you on good terms with any of the members of her family so you could pass on "helpful" advice regarding this? |
Originally Posted by Olton Hall
(Post 12196538)
Well writen and plausaable legal mumbo jumbo scares people.
|
Originally Posted by xyzzy
(Post 12196541)
... spelling counts too.
|
Originally Posted by xyzzy
(Post 12196528)
^ +1 ^
IMHO you want to let her know that you know the law is on your side and that her disposal/loss of the ring is unlawful. Is she fighting the annulment? Are you on good terms with any of the members of her family so you could pass on "helpful" advice regarding this? |
Originally Posted by xyzzy
(Post 12196427)
Same here. I didn't even recall that someone was writing new ones.
You should check out some of the first ones, a lot more attitude and a lot less "yes sir" 1950s BS. |
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196557)
F. I dunno. I just prayed porcelain Yah-weh.
|
Originally Posted by Plus1
(Post 12196558)
It's a franchise; somebody's always writing new ones. FW Dixon is a nom de plume for whomever the current author is.
You should check out some of the first ones, a lot more attitude and a lot less "yes sir" 1950s BS. The Hardy Boys have evolved in various ways since their first appearance in 1927. Beginning in 1959, the books were extensively revised, largely to eliminate racist stereotypes. The books were also written in a simpler style in an attempt to compete with television. Some critics argue that in the process the Hardy Boys changed, becoming more respectful of the law and simultaneously more affluent, "agents of the adult ruling class"[1] rather than characters who aided the poor. A new Hardy Boys series, the Hardy Boys Casefiles, was created in the 1980s, and featured murders, violence, and international espionage. The original Hardy Boys Mystery Stories series ended in 2005. A new series, Undercover Brothers, was launched the same year, featuring updated versions of the characters who narrate their adventures in the first person. |
Originally Posted by Phudnik
(Post 12196535)
Has she seen the original one with Hayley Mills? My six-year-old liked that one better (though she saw it first).
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 12196557)
F. I dunno. I just prayed porcelain Yah-weh.
Good night, Box. A special good night, Plus1. |
Originally Posted by Plus1
(Post 12196558)
It's a franchise; somebody's always writing new ones. FW Dixon is a nom de plume for whomever the current author is.
You should check out some of the first ones, a lot more attitude and a lot less "yes sir" 1950s BS. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 pm. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.