![]() |
|
Originally Posted by zippypinhead
(Post 11699522)
CM, I noticed you posted last over there. What's the outlook for the original poster? Is he getting miles or a de-lousing?
|
I hate people :(
|
Originally Posted by colpuck
(Post 11699451)
If I am reading this right, a 772ER can do IAH-AKL non-stop weight restricted and the 772LR without weight restrictions.
|
Originally Posted by icurhere2
(Post 11699518)
Starting with our accounting rules - corporations have the ability to distress their own debt, buy it back (at the reduced price), retire the liability, and mark operating income from the transaction.
big drug store builds building lists store on private site were only a few people see it, subsidiary company buys the building at an inflated price(5 million), company that built the building has a set 25 year lease for an insane rate (upwards of 500k a year). So, what seems fishy? Why would they sell the building, only to lease it at a FAR HIGHER price? and why would subsidiary company be the buyer? |
Originally Posted by icurhere2
(Post 11699518)
Starting with our accounting rules - corporations have the ability to distress their own debt, buy it back (at the reduced price), retire the liability, and mark operating income from the transaction.
|
Originally Posted by KNRG
(Post 11699543)
I hate people :(
|
Originally Posted by Steph3n
(Post 11699510)
I think both parties would be doing the same mistakes.
Whoever had been sworn in, in January inherited one of the worst set of circumstances for an incoming President. Obama is proving that he's working towards getting us out of the economic basement. His administration is putting forward plans that seem to be working in the short-term (which was desperately needed). What kills me is [I feel like] we're setting ourselves up for failure. We can debate all day (and OMNI P/R often does) about whether it would have been better to dig the hole we were in deeper in favor of developing a more sustainable plan vs cutting off the loss and creating an unsustainable short-term gain. I see both sides of the argument. And, I guess we've selected the latter. I just hope someone in charge of something realizes this and work towards transitioning towards a long-term viable economic growth before the next collapse. |
Originally Posted by rolov
(Post 11699551)
IAH-AKL is shorter than EWR-HKG
|
Originally Posted by Steph3n
(Post 11699554)
So, what seems fishy? Why would they sell the building, only to lease it at a FAR HIGHER price? and why would subsidiary company be the buyer?
|
Originally Posted by AMF in NJ
(Post 11699267)
:eek: Who does this with talking about it beforehand? :eek::rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11699581)
Even with ETOPS rules in effect? CO doesn't fly over Mexico into the Pacific so they would head to the west coast and then start heading SW. Though, QF does LAX-AKL on a 332 now so in theory, a 772 should be able to do it from IAH thought it would be landing on fumes.
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 11699515)
Even if you're right, it truthfully doesn't mean much. Larry is well-known to dislike subfleets. Buying LR's just for AKL or CHC, or buying LR's at all, isn't the CO style.
Also a while back DL asked Boeing to stretch the range of the LR to make US East Coast to SYD work, they really want to fly nonstop to SYD from the East Coast. |
Originally Posted by fozz
(Post 11699581)
Even with ETOPS rules in effect? CO doesn't fly over Mexico into the Pacific so they would head to the west coast and then start heading SW. Though, QF does LAX-AKL on a 332 now so in theory, a 772 should be able to do it from IAH thought it would be landing on fumes.
|
Originally Posted by rolov
(Post 11699601)
Also a while back DL asked Boeing to stretch the range of the LR to make US East Coast to SYD work, they really want to fly nonstop to SYD from the East Coast.
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 11699618)
The only way IAH-AKL is kosher on a Great Circle routing is to have 330-minute ETOPS. That means it has to be flown by a 77W, no?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:58 pm. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.