Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 6, 2021, 5:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: Prospero
This thread is the continuation of the discussion hosted in the BA Tier Point Runs | 2019-20 edition thread.

Useful tips and technical pointers
El_Duderito's explanation on fare routings and the maximum permitted distance you are allowed to travel (based on the distance between the origin and destination airports)

Helpful maps
The following series of maps show a 2,000 mile radius around each oneworld hub, useful for strategic planning purposes. Hopefully these will help your imagination to run free. Click on the images to reveal the accompanying maps.

EMEA


Asia Pacific


North America




Previous editions
BA Tier Point Runs | 2019-20 edition
BA Tier Point Runs | 2018 edition
BA Tier Point Runs | 2017 edition
BA Tier Point Runs | 2016 edition
BA Tier Point Runs | 2015 edition
BA Tier Point Runs | 2014 edition
BA Tier Point Runs | original edition
Print Wikipost

BA Tier Point Runs | 2021 edition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:16 am
  #1621  
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,991
I am trying to think, are there examples of routes where BA and a oneworld competitor operates and where TP accrual rates differ?
KARFA is online now  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:19 am
  #1622  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WAW ✈ LHR ✈ GLA
Programs: BA GfL/GGL/CCR, HH Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 2,502
Originally Posted by nufnuf77
Indeed, its unfortunate that routing BUD-LHR-LAX-JFK-BOG exceeds the MPM ever so slightly as that would have been 1200tp return journey!
how about going via Boston?
megaloman is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:24 am
  #1623  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 579
Originally Posted by lost_in_translation
Awarding more Tier Points for flying the same flight on a competitor doesn't totally make sense so I'm not hugely surprised by this change, it seems it just took BA time to update earnings for other oneworld partners. The writing was probably on the wall on this when they downgraded AMM to CE rather than CW so I imagine this is a permanent change. The lack of notice is not great but I don't think BA has ever sent out emails for TP earning changes. I would ping BA an email saying you saw long haul TPs in the calculator at the time you booked and see if they will give you credit for that anyway without a screenshot.
I mean the difference is RJ offer a longhaul product (lie flat beds else deep recline) and charge long haul prices. BA offer Club Europe and no legroom. So the competitor is offering a more expensive product and should earn more. If we go down that route why should connecting flights with OW partners earn more than direct flights with BA?
I've now called them with exactly this. The agent had not heard of any change and was very surprised. I stupidly didn't take a screenshot of MMB before the IT shutdown. But I DID book knowing it was 140TPs so very much feel short changed. If there is now an alignment, disappointing, but don't apply it for past bookings. The agent is chasing this up and sounded positive. I certainly won't take this lying down otherwise it will almost certainly be drop to Silver for me this year.

Originally Posted by KARFA
I am trying to think, are there examples of routes where BA and a oneworld competitor operates and where TP accrual rates differ?
So am I. The problem is this is a Longhaul vs Shorthaul situation which is probably unique.
GBOAC is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:26 am
  #1624  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,264
Originally Posted by KARFA
I am trying to think, are there examples of routes where BA and a oneworld competitor operates and where TP accrual rates differ?
Can't name any, I think TPs always seem to be the same for the same segment. Aer Lingus is a non-oneworld partner where DUB is Avios but not TP earning, but not quite the same question!
lost_in_translation is online now  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:34 am
  #1625  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,264
Originally Posted by GBOAC
I mean the difference is RJ offer a longhaul product (lie flat beds else deep recline) and charge long haul prices. BA offer Club Europe and no legroom. So the competitor is offering a more expensive product and should earn more. If we go down that route why should connecting flights with OW partners earn more than direct flights with BA?
I've now called them with exactly this. The agent had not heard of any change and was very surprised. I stupidly didn't take a screenshot of MMB before the IT shutdown. But I DID book knowing it was 140TPs so very much feel short changed. If there is now an alignment, disappointing, but don't apply it for past bookings. The agent is chasing this up and sounded positive. I certainly won't take this lying down otherwise it will almost certainly be drop to Silver for me this year.


So am I. The problem is this is a Longhaul vs Shorthaul situation which is probably unique.
The point of BAEC isn't to reward you as a frequent flier for spending money with oneworld, it is to encourage you to spend money with BA and, only if that is not possible, to then spend money with partners instead. It makes more commercial sense to me for BA to offer additional TPs for flying the BA flight, not the RJ one, regardless of comfort levels. My understanding is BA earns a kick back from RJ for agreeing to allow RJ let you credit your flights to BAEC but that's basically it in the absence of a JV/JBA and I'm sure they'd still prefer that you just book with BA in the first place, which is clearly disincentivised in this situation if RJ earns more TPs than BA.

Your question on connecting partner flights is a good one and I don't have an answer beyond that eventually, BA will probably change this and move to a more revenue-based programme in my opinion.

Last edited by lost_in_translation; Nov 24, 2021 at 4:39 am
lost_in_translation is online now  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:39 am
  #1626  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,367
Originally Posted by KARFA
I am trying to think, are there examples of routes where BA and a oneworld competitor operates and where TP accrual rates differ?
The problem is only going to arise with the 80 TPs long CE band or sub 2000 miles CW routes where both BA and another OW airline operate. You are not going to get gazillions of these. I can think of only 3 routes that potentially fall within this: LHR-HEL, LHR-DME and LHR-AMM. For both HEL and DME, TP earnings for flights on other OW airlines (AY, S7) are aligned (and, by extension for MAN-HEL on AY as well) but we are still talking of a minute number of routes where the number is far too low to extract a rule of general application and only works to upgrade the number of TPs rather than downgrade it. They are now doing the same for AMM but that does not stop this being anomalous: the dividing line for non-BA airlines is not supposed to be CE vs CW (since that distinction is meaningless on airlines other than BA) but whether the flight is sub 2000 miles or 2000 miles or more. LHR-AMM is very clearly well above the 2000 miles threshold and should therefore attract long-haul TPs rather than short-haul TPs.

You now get the anomaly that some RJ routes to Western Europe which are shorter than LHR-AMM attract long-haul TPs even though LHR-AMM does not. Admittedly, the reverse is true with HEL (i.e. you get HEL-Western Europe routes on AY which get 40 TPs even though they are longer than LHR-HEL, which attracts 80 TPs).
ENTP likes this.

Last edited by NickB; Nov 24, 2021 at 4:45 am
NickB is online now  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:46 am
  #1627  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 579
Originally Posted by lost_in_translation
The point of BAEC isn't to reward you as a frequent flier for spending money with oneworld, it is to encourage you to spend money with BA and, only if that is not possible, to then spend money with partners instead. It makes more commercial sense to me for BA to offer additional TPs for flying the BA flight, not the RJ one, regardless of comfort levels. My understanding is BA earns a kick back from RJ for agreeing to allow RJ let you credit your flights to BAEC but that's basically it in the absence of a JV/JBA and I'm sure they'd still prefer that you just book with BA in the first place, which is clearly disincentivised in this situation if RJ earns more TPs than BA.

Your question on connecting partner flights is a good one and I don't have an answer beyond that eventually, BA will probably change this and move to a more revenue-based programme in my opinion.
So, I would have flown BA if they offered the route on the days I needed (they are not operating daily to Amman at the moment), and also are not offering a true business class product for a nearly 5hr flight. It is therefore not possible to buy the product I want from BA, and I am forced to go with partners. Especially so at times when BA's own route network is still below capacity
Either way, had I know at the time of booking I could have made an informed choice. I think I am most p*ssed off by the fact I was sold one thing by BA/Oneworld and appear to have been given something else...

There are deeper questions here over how regular users of a route which has switchen from CW to CE can still be expected to retain status. They are travelling as much, but just earning fewer points. Hardly our fault...!
GBOAC is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 4:54 am
  #1628  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL, OZ, AC, AS, AA, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG
Posts: 19,903
I am looking for advice on getting my 4 BA segments on the cheap. Between now and May 8th, 2022, I'll be in YVR. What's the most efficient way to attain my 4 BA segments and TPs in the best £:TP ratio? I'm fully vaccinated and willing to go anywhere.
flyerkit likes this.
lsquare is online now  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 6:26 am
  #1629  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 72
Am I able to enter Bulgaria from the UK right now? I'm reading conflicting things online, assuming I have a negative PCR test and am fully vaxxed, I was under the impression I'd be able to enter.

Anyone been recently?
Benedmonds is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 6:50 am
  #1630  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, Hilton Honors Diamond, Virgin Flying Club Gold
Posts: 127
Originally Posted by Benedmonds
Am I able to enter Bulgaria from the UK right now? I'm reading conflicting things online, assuming I have a negative PCR test and am fully vaxxed, I was under the impression I'd be able to enter.

Anyone been recently?
A friend has recently gone back to visit family and had to do a PCR test and present a vaccine passport at the border. No issues albeit a short queue at Sofia.
Sifu is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 8:25 am
  #1631  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WAW ✈ LHR ✈ GLA
Programs: BA GfL/GGL/CCR, HH Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 2,502
Originally Posted by evanstim
Sneaky .......s. I can confirm when I did LHR <> AMM in early October, I earned 140 TPs.

Now, according to the BAEC calculator, it has indeed dropped down to 80TPs. But, HEY! We do get an extra whole 5 Avios!

One for HeadForPoints to investigate?


It's because route was demoted from long haul to short haul offering - same happened with BEY, CAI and DME. Even if you get 788, you'll get Club Europe catering in Club and water + crisps in Y. BA got rid of their midhaul configured A321s.

RJ still earns 140 on that LHR-AMM.
megaloman is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 8:30 am
  #1632  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,683
Originally Posted by FlyerTalkUserName
Very new to this, but I've recently accepted a new job that will see me flying quick trips TPA-MIA once each month for the foreseeable future. I'm trying to take advantage of BA's reduced status levels to get Oneworld Sapphire for Flagship Lounge access at MIA. The standby flexibility would be a great perk as well since there are quite a few daily flights on the route. ...
Originally Posted by champignon
Here's a contrary opinion. It sounds to me like the focus of your travel isn't with BA, and that the exercise you are contemplating doing is basically a waste of your time and money. You aren't based in Europe nor does it appear that you really have any use for BA's route system. I also don't think you will get Flagship First lounge access with Sapphire status and when not flying in Flagship First on AA, or in long haul First with another OW carrier like BA. You should check the rules for Flagship First lounge access, perhaps over on the AA Forum.
There are two separate things: AA Flagship lounge access and Flagship First Dining. Flagship lounge is for OW Silver/Emerald on any OW flight, or someone flying intl OW J/F, or AA Plat/higher on intl flight, or AA CK on any OW flight, or someone willing to pay $150. Flagship First Dining is separate from the Flagship lounge and not accessible based on any OW status alone. There have been promos in the past where AA invites someone to try Flagship First Dining (I recall getting these certs as a BA Gold a couple years ago); in fact, there appears to be a current promo for AA CK.

Originally Posted by champignon
Having read a lot of posts over on the AA forum, dealing with Flagship First -- the big deal isn't the FF lounge, it's the FF Dining Room that is available at select hubs (most notably JFK, MIA, and LAX, with the latter, at least, currently being closed by report).

I do NOT think that you can get into FF Dining easily, and I doubt that OWS or OWE status while flying TPA-MIA will not get you in there regardless of class of service.

At the current time, from what I've read, there are few Flagship First lounges that are anything more than a roped off section of the Admirals Club, and in any event are an unremarkable upgrade to a basic business class lounge.

I would definitely be posing these questions over on the AA forum if you are seeking answers from people who know the most about this topic.
The Flagship Lounge is way better than the Admirals Club, not just because of the food offerings but typically less crowded as well.
izzik is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 8:56 am
  #1633  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 579
Originally Posted by megaloman
It's because route was demoted from long haul to short haul offering - same happened with BEY, CAI and DME. Even if you get 788, you'll get Club Europe catering in Club and water + crisps in Y. BA got rid of their midhaul configured A321s.

RJ still earns 140 on that LHR-AMM.
No this is exactly my point, I've just flown RJ and I was only awarded 80TPs on an RJ ticket on LHR-AMM. No notice given by BA, no change in service (or price) from RJ. The point is I purchased long-haul busines on RJ and have been given short haul TPs by BA
GBOAC is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2021, 10:05 am
  #1634  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WAW ✈ LHR ✈ GLA
Programs: BA GfL/GGL/CCR, HH Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 2,502
Originally Posted by GBOAC
No this is exactly my point, I've just flown RJ and I was only awarded 80TPs on an RJ ticket on LHR-AMM. No notice given by BA, no change in service (or price) from RJ. The point is I purchased long-haul busines on RJ and have been given short haul TPs by BA
Oh yes, sorry, I didn't notice it was RJ earning now 80 tier points. This is some intern mistake again - RJ should still earn 140 tps as it's a partner airline over 2000 miles flight.
megaloman is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2021, 8:43 am
  #1635  
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 3
About to earn a BA 2-4-1 voucher, but I currently need to earn circa 40K avios to redeem on the route I hope to use it for (BA CW to SIN rtn). With family on the West Coast, I wondered what would be the cheapest way to earn the necessary avios, and whether a BA Tier point run would be the best way to make this happen?

Currently BA Blue, which leads into the second question... if on a TP run, after flight 7 of 10 on the same ticket, and reaching the required TP for silver, would the following three flights be credited with the avios bonus of being a silver member?
Luke Outdoors is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.