E-tickets are here!
#121
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 13,989
Can you explain what this means?
#122
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SGF
Programs: AS, AA, UA, AGR S (former 75K, GLD, 1K, and S+, now an elite peon)
Posts: 23,207
What what means?
Pretty simple. There are a number of apps available for smartphones and a number of websites you can upload a barcode image to that will translate the barcode into whatever text (yes, a barcode is just a way to encode text into a machine-readable format) was used to create the barcode.
Pretty simple...but I will be happy to expand on it if you need this interpreted, too.
The whole two-part system of "reservations and tickets" is really a relic of the ancient days of travel--before electronic ticketing became popular. You needed a reservation so the airline knew you were coming and didn't sell too many seats on a given aircraft. Your travel agent would contact the airline and place the reservation for your seat. However, the reservation didn't have any intrinsic value in and of itself. You would pay your travel agency for the flight, and they would then issue you a paper ticket which did have intrinsic value, and you were required to carry that ticket to the airport (where you would obtain a boarding pass, which referenced the fact that you had a reservation for that flight) and surrender it when boarding your flight. The airline's accounting department after the fact would then settle the tickets and deal with exchanging money between itself and the travel agencies.
With the advent of CRSes (computer reservation systems) and the installation of GDS terminals in travel agencies around the world, the process of finding flights and placing reservations was streamlined a great deal, but you still had to pay your travel agent and get a paper ticket issued to provide when boarding (remember the boarding passes that said "FLIGHT COUPON REQUIRED"?), which the airline's accounting department then settled against the electronic reservation record.
Then, a couple of decades ago, the concept of the e-ticket came about, and the ticket details then remained stored in an electronic record. Still, aside from not having to physically present the ticket during the boarding process, the process remains the same: the reservation is created, the ticket is issued, the boarding pass is created, and then after the flight, the ticket is settled against the reservation.
Really, though, there's no reason there needs to be so many steps. It is this way because the airlines are still using the same 1960s-era mainframe-based legacy CRSes they always have, and it was a lot simpler and cheaper to modify the existing systems to deal with electronic records than to overhaul the entire system. All of the steps of the process you see during a modern day airline transaction correspond directly to manual steps of the process in the olden days. For more on that, check this thread out and read the next four posts.
If someone were creating an airline from scratch in the modern era (and didn't have to worry about integrating it with other, existing carriers and the messes created by interlining and codesharing and plating a ticket on one carrier for a flight on a different carrier and all of that), it would actually be fairly simple to program a system that just lets you book a flight. You'd receive a receipt that shows you're booked on the flight, and a quick verification of the receipt's validity would let you get on the plane. You could entirely skip the whole process of issuing a ticket and generating a boarding pass and ensuring that the reservation data and ticket data are in sync and all of that. That would be a ticketless system. But it would represent a wholesale change in the way the reservation system works, and I'm pretty confident Amtrak didn't reinvent the wheel. (We would know about it if they did.)
This is likely what actually happens. There's no real need anymore for the customer to know about or care about the ticket number. The conductors' iPhones are programmed to pull up the customer's record by the reservation number, and behind the scenes, ARROW then checks to ensure a valid ticket is attached to the reservation and allows the conductor to virtually "lift" the ticket.
Pretty simple. There are a number of apps available for smartphones and a number of websites you can upload a barcode image to that will translate the barcode into whatever text (yes, a barcode is just a way to encode text into a machine-readable format) was used to create the barcode.
With the advent of CRSes (computer reservation systems) and the installation of GDS terminals in travel agencies around the world, the process of finding flights and placing reservations was streamlined a great deal, but you still had to pay your travel agent and get a paper ticket issued to provide when boarding (remember the boarding passes that said "FLIGHT COUPON REQUIRED"?), which the airline's accounting department then settled against the electronic reservation record.
Then, a couple of decades ago, the concept of the e-ticket came about, and the ticket details then remained stored in an electronic record. Still, aside from not having to physically present the ticket during the boarding process, the process remains the same: the reservation is created, the ticket is issued, the boarding pass is created, and then after the flight, the ticket is settled against the reservation.
Really, though, there's no reason there needs to be so many steps. It is this way because the airlines are still using the same 1960s-era mainframe-based legacy CRSes they always have, and it was a lot simpler and cheaper to modify the existing systems to deal with electronic records than to overhaul the entire system. All of the steps of the process you see during a modern day airline transaction correspond directly to manual steps of the process in the olden days. For more on that, check this thread out and read the next four posts.
If someone were creating an airline from scratch in the modern era (and didn't have to worry about integrating it with other, existing carriers and the messes created by interlining and codesharing and plating a ticket on one carrier for a flight on a different carrier and all of that), it would actually be fairly simple to program a system that just lets you book a flight. You'd receive a receipt that shows you're booked on the flight, and a quick verification of the receipt's validity would let you get on the plane. You could entirely skip the whole process of issuing a ticket and generating a boarding pass and ensuring that the reservation data and ticket data are in sync and all of that. That would be a ticketless system. But it would represent a wholesale change in the way the reservation system works, and I'm pretty confident Amtrak didn't reinvent the wheel. (We would know about it if they did.)
This is likely what actually happens. There's no real need anymore for the customer to know about or care about the ticket number. The conductors' iPhones are programmed to pull up the customer's record by the reservation number, and behind the scenes, ARROW then checks to ensure a valid ticket is attached to the reservation and allows the conductor to virtually "lift" the ticket.
#124
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: BOS/PVD
Posts: 461
As I like to joke, airlines are so innovative that they were one of the the first commercial users of computer technology way back in the 1950s (the contract establishing American Airline's partnership with IBM to develop SABRE was signed in 1957)--they just haven't been able to afford to upgrade since.
That may be an exaggeration, but the reality is that no matter how many upgrade iterations a CRS goes through, it generally needs to retain backwards-compatible functionality because there are so many other systems out there that interface with it (including the GDSes). Thus the need to keep the bifurcated reservation/ticket scheme even though we now live in a (theoretically) 100% e-ticket world. And although ARROW was developed specifically for Amtrak, it still was built for an (airline) paper ticket world--after all, I believe ARC-affiliated travel agents can still issue paper "flight coupons" (aka tickets) to this day for use on Amtrak.
#125
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 22
surprise eVoucher
I took a special (1171) from BOS to NRO on Thanksgiving morning, and came back up on the Twilight Shoreliner (66) from NYP to BOS this morning, together on a multicity eTicket (my first eTicket).
66 got in to Boston around 7:50am. At 2:46pm, Amtrak emailed me an eVoucher, saying:
When I boarded 66, the conductor did seem to be having trouble with his iPhone after succesfully scanning the QR code (off a paper printout), and he fiddled around for 30 seconds or so before moving on. I suppose I should have asked him, but he looked sort of tired.
Is this a common failure? I wonder how many of these eVouchers they give out to passengers who actually took the travel as expected. I'm not sure if I should call them and let them know, or just take it as a windfall.
Thoughts?
66 got in to Boston around 7:50am. At 2:46pm, Amtrak emailed me an eVoucher, saying:
Your reservation was modified because of one or more no-show passengers. All remaining space reserved for the no-show passenger(s) has been canceled (including additional segments for later travel). An electronic voucher (eVoucher) was created to hold the value of the unused travel (excluding any fees or penalties). This eVoucher may be used as payment toward future Amtrak travel.
Is this a common failure? I wonder how many of these eVouchers they give out to passengers who actually took the travel as expected. I'm not sure if I should call them and let them know, or just take it as a windfall.
Thoughts?
#126
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SGF
Programs: AS, AA, UA, AGR S (former 75K, GLD, 1K, and S+, now an elite peon)
Posts: 23,207
You may be right. I've only had experience with weird issues on unreserved trains (Keystone and Surfliner). On the Keystone, I'm usually using tickets for vastly different dates than I've purchased them for, which would understandably make it hard for them to look up my information in an area of bad coverage.
No idea what happened with the Surfliner trip yesterday--I was traveling on the exact train I had chosen during the booking process. (In fact, I showed up at the Santa Fe depot early enough to take the next earlier train, but when I saw it was using the single-level Horizon/Amfleet equipment, I went across the street to Starbucks and worked for an hour and a half until my originally-booked train, which (fortunately) had the bi-level Surfliner cars in its consist.
As an aside, I picked a rear-facing seat in one of the Surfliner cars, figuring that the lone Superliner car in the consist would not be outfitted with wifi and power. I walked through the Superliner car later and was shocked to discover that not only did it have a strong wifi signal, it also had two power outlets per seat, compared to the single outlet per seat in the Surfliner cars! Lesson learned for next time.
No idea what happened with the Surfliner trip yesterday--I was traveling on the exact train I had chosen during the booking process. (In fact, I showed up at the Santa Fe depot early enough to take the next earlier train, but when I saw it was using the single-level Horizon/Amfleet equipment, I went across the street to Starbucks and worked for an hour and a half until my originally-booked train, which (fortunately) had the bi-level Surfliner cars in its consist.
As an aside, I picked a rear-facing seat in one of the Surfliner cars, figuring that the lone Superliner car in the consist would not be outfitted with wifi and power. I walked through the Superliner car later and was shocked to discover that not only did it have a strong wifi signal, it also had two power outlets per seat, compared to the single outlet per seat in the Surfliner cars! Lesson learned for next time.
#127
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: Amtrak S+, Kimpton IC
Posts: 298
Never did get a call back from the refund department, but my refund just appeared... not very good communication and took way too long, but the refund is complete.
They need to reengineer the refund process!
They need to reengineer the refund process!
I'd call and ask the agent for a transfer to Customer service, let them deal with it. Not a regular agent.
I'm not even sure if Amtrak bothers to participate in the BBB, so there is probably very little that the BBB can do. Even if Amtrak participated, the BBB is still very limited in what they can do.
I'm not even sure if Amtrak bothers to participate in the BBB, so there is probably very little that the BBB can do. Even if Amtrak participated, the BBB is still very limited in what they can do.
#128
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: SPG Plat, Hyatt Diamond, AA EXP, UA 1K
Posts: 84
Building on this point....could use some insights from the pros here re: Amtrak ticketing systems.
I also need to "top off" AGR points (500 mile pairs) and was thinking of booking NYP-WAS at 8am (scheduled arrival in WAS at 10:45am)
However-
Could I:
1. Buy and use the NYP-WAS ticket (8am - 10:45am)
2. Get off early in PHL in 9:10am
3. Buy and use a separate WAS-NYP ticket (8am departure) and board in PHL at 9:33am to arrive at NYP at 10:46am (the same time I was originally supposed to arrive in WAS on my outbound ticket?)
Will Amtrak's systems allow me to book and pay for overlapping tickets like this? If so, would there be any reason not to get the 1000 AGR points (and ~3 hours of time back)?
I also need to "top off" AGR points (500 mile pairs) and was thinking of booking NYP-WAS at 8am (scheduled arrival in WAS at 10:45am)
However-
Could I:
1. Buy and use the NYP-WAS ticket (8am - 10:45am)
2. Get off early in PHL in 9:10am
3. Buy and use a separate WAS-NYP ticket (8am departure) and board in PHL at 9:33am to arrive at NYP at 10:46am (the same time I was originally supposed to arrive in WAS on my outbound ticket?)
Will Amtrak's systems allow me to book and pay for overlapping tickets like this? If so, would there be any reason not to get the 1000 AGR points (and ~3 hours of time back)?
An article about e-ticketing in this month's Trains magazine says that Amtrak is now allowing two hours between departure from the ticketed station and the scan before the reservation is cancelled. The reason stated was to permit boarding at a station down the line. It is not confirmed (as in someone trying), but it sounds like this problem may be solved.
#129
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Florida
Programs: AA LTG (EXP), Hilton Silver (Dia), Marriott LTP (PP), SPG LTG (P) > MPG LTPP
Posts: 11,329
Building on this point....could use some insights from the pros here re: Amtrak ticketing systems.
I also need to "top off" AGR points (500 mile pairs) and was thinking of booking NYP-WAS at 8am (scheduled arrival in WAS at 10:45am)
However-
Could I:
1. Buy and use the NYP-WAS ticket (8am - 10:45am)
2. Get off early in PHL in 9:10am
3. Buy and use a separate WAS-NYP ticket (8am departure) and board in PHL at 9:33am to arrive at NYP at 10:46am (the same time I was originally supposed to arrive in WAS on my outbound ticket?)
Will Amtrak's systems allow me to book and pay for overlapping tickets like this? If so, would there be any reason not to get the 1000 AGR points (and ~3 hours of time back)?
I also need to "top off" AGR points (500 mile pairs) and was thinking of booking NYP-WAS at 8am (scheduled arrival in WAS at 10:45am)
However-
Could I:
1. Buy and use the NYP-WAS ticket (8am - 10:45am)
2. Get off early in PHL in 9:10am
3. Buy and use a separate WAS-NYP ticket (8am departure) and board in PHL at 9:33am to arrive at NYP at 10:46am (the same time I was originally supposed to arrive in WAS on my outbound ticket?)
Will Amtrak's systems allow me to book and pay for overlapping tickets like this? If so, would there be any reason not to get the 1000 AGR points (and ~3 hours of time back)?
As someone stated elsewhere: Amtrak doesn't care if you get off the train before your stop, but they do care if you get off before the train stops!
#131
In Memoriam
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York, NY, USA
Programs: HH Diamond, Amtrak Exec
Posts: 3,262
I don't think you will have any issues. It appears the AGR system does not really care about miss-matched tickets. I do the SAC RNO run quite a bit and they usually have my return posted as happening before my departure! It turns out they post LD trains as of it's departure from origin and not your boarding. So since the CZ leaves CHI three days before it leaves RNO, my ticket posts as of the CHI date.
#132
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ONT
Programs: AGR, UA, AA
Posts: 476
There was one publicly reported incidence of a "force lift", and that occurred on the San Joaquin bus network over Thanksgiving. Because they were running extra sections on the LA-Bakersfield, Sacramento-Stockton, and a few of the other runs, rather than give the extra bus operators scanners Amtrak force lifted all bus tickets for that weekend, on the Thurway buses affected. Drivers were just asked to look at ticket stubs and not collect anything. Unfortunately, this reinforces the need to cancel unused tickets before departure, to avoid force lifting.
#133
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: BOS
Programs: JetBlue Mosaic, WN A List Preferred, Hyatt Globalest, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, IHG Spire
Posts: 3,966
Computer Sweep for Conflicting Reservations
Maybe the pax could book the 2nd reservation with a middle initial, and not add the AGR# until right at departure time, so to the system they look less alike.
Also do you know anything about when and how this Amtrak conflicting reservation sweep procedure works? For instance does it run every night, or several times a day?
Since Amtrak does not readily allow same day changes, like Southwest, I could see pax on occaision might book more than 1 train, and then just refund the unused tickets or use the unused ticket value for later travel (like on Southwest). For instance your traveling NYP to WAS but you don't know wht time you actually want to or would be ready to leave NYP.
Also I wonder if Amtrak will ever be able to do standby like the airlines especially at bigger stations. Wonder too how high the no show factor is since at least in past you could get a refund or re-use the funds without penalty fee.
Also do you know anything about when and how this Amtrak conflicting reservation sweep procedure works? For instance does it run every night, or several times a day?
Since Amtrak does not readily allow same day changes, like Southwest, I could see pax on occaision might book more than 1 train, and then just refund the unused tickets or use the unused ticket value for later travel (like on Southwest). For instance your traveling NYP to WAS but you don't know wht time you actually want to or would be ready to leave NYP.
Also I wonder if Amtrak will ever be able to do standby like the airlines especially at bigger stations. Wonder too how high the no show factor is since at least in past you could get a refund or re-use the funds without penalty fee.
#134
In Memoriam
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York, NY, USA
Programs: HH Diamond, Amtrak Exec
Posts: 3,262
Don't see a standby list happening, at least not until Acela ticketing is handled in the way it was originally intended; if that ever happens. Originally Amtrak, when Acela was first introduced, was working on a system whereby anyone no-showing would be indicated in ARROW and that seat would go back on the market for stations further up the line.
Even if they ever implement that in the future, I don't see a standby list being maintained, most likely in today's electronic age you'd just keep checking to see if seats suddenly go on sale.
#135
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern CT & Phoenix, AZ
Programs: UA Premier Gold, Hyatt Plat, Hilton Silver, Marriott Gold
Posts: 237
UA codeshare - how to?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; en-us; Galaxy Nexus Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30)
Discovered today that UA code share segments do print as e-tickets. (You can even get the PDF sent to you if you call and ask; I don't have an iPhone so I couldn't try the app route but seems likely that works, too.)
One point to note is that you can only use the lookup by UA flight number the first time; after that, you have to use the Amtrak PNR to reprint.
Discovered today that UA code share segments do print as e-tickets. (You can even get the PDF sent to you if you call and ask; I don't have an iPhone so I couldn't try the app route but seems likely that works, too.)
One point to note is that you can only use the lookup by UA flight number the first time; after that, you have to use the Amtrak PNR to reprint.