Last edit by: JDiver
SWU / Rewards for EXP and Beyond [more than 200K EQP/EQM]
Executive Platinum AAdvantage members with 150,000 and 200,000 EQ Miles will automatically receive two extra SWU / Systemwide Upgrades (two at 150,000 EQM and at 200,000 EQM thereafter, earned in the same calendar year).
If you think you are eligible and have not received them, call AAdvantage Customer Service:
AAdvantage Customer Service
Have questions about your AAdvantage account or program benefits?
Call us
Within the U.S. or Canada
800-882-8880 or your elite reservation number
Monday - Friday.
8:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. CT
817-963-7882 (fax)
Have questions about your AAdvantage account or program benefits?
Call us
Within the U.S. or Canada
800-882-8880 or your elite reservation number
Monday - Friday.
8:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. CT
817-963-7882 (fax)
Rumor: new elite level(s) and low-fare product details coming
SWU / Rewards for EXP and Beyond [more than 200k EQP/EQM - what next?]
#181
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Nice! Things most definitely running much more smoothly this year with this program than previous for those who qualify for it.
#182
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 1,792
If this is true, it is overdue, and I commend it. I never comprehended the defense (of the carrier) that the unpublished upgrade thing was some mystical business thing that we should all stand in awe of. I challenge then to make it all transparent to flying Advantage customers.
Now, having said that, I would also challenge AA to do what DL does and roll over elite miles accumulated past the 100k threshold--into next year. Highly doubt they'll do it.
My wife will be over 250K medallion miles on DL by the end of this year (she flew a lot to JFK to see grandkids) and will, consequently, be diamond on DL all the way to 2018. All she has to do is plunk her AMEX card up to 25K for the 2016 year which, unfortunately for me, comes very easy to her.
Anyway, if this is all true, i applaud AA, hope it truly sticks and endures, and hope
AA publicizes this to more customers than those on the FT boards
#183
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NC
Programs: AAConciergeKey/1MM, DL DM/2 MM, UA Gold,Hilton Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 11,982
A chart posted on milevalue.com shows that 4 eVIPs are the max that most people will receive when overachieving. I don't believe I have a very high Helix score, so once I hit 175k, I may just switch to another airline. Or are those without presumably high Helix scores getting another pair of SWUs after 200k EQP?
#184
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Global
Posts: 5,998
A chart posted on milevalue.com shows that 4 eVIPs are the max that most people will receive when overachieving. I don't believe I have a very high Helix score, so once I hit 175k, I may just switch to another airline. Or are those without presumably high Helix scores getting another pair of SWUs after 200k EQP?
#185
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Get the info from the _source_ of the info
A chart posted on milevalue.com shows that 4 eVIPs are the max that most people will receive when overachieving. I don't believe I have a very high Helix score, so once I hit 175k, I may just switch to another airline. Or are those without presumably high Helix scores getting another pair of SWUs after 200k EQP?
There is NO doubt that some EPs are getting well over 4 SWUs for their overachieving-- I have about 10 examples from the last month.
You can see that some overachieving EPs historically get a "maximum of 4" (those with middling Helix scores) right here on my travelingbetter thread:
http://www.travelingbetter.com/showp...&postcount=124
Trust the actual source of all this information-- me. Not those who take my information and innacutatey repackage it.
Last edited by JonNYC; Sep 26, 2015 at 10:49 am
#187
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Programs: AA ExP, Turkish Gold, Spire Amb, Hilton Gold, Club Carlson Gold, SPG Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 10
I was denied additional SWUs last night. The agent was not familiar with any additional SWU program for additional points. He also asked his colleagues apparently. I currently have 146k points (and 116k miles). I found out my Eagle Score is a lowly 2, so maybe that is the reason. In any event, I plan to try again another time.
#188
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
I was denied additional SWUs last night. The agent was not familiar with any additional SWU program for additional points. He also asked his colleagues apparently. I currently have 146k points (and 116k miles). I found out my Eagle Score is a lowly 2, so maybe that is the reason. In any event, I plan to try again another time.
#189
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Global
Posts: 5,998
I was denied additional SWUs last night. The agent was not familiar with any additional SWU program for additional points. He also asked his colleagues apparently. I currently have 146k points (and 116k miles). I found out my Eagle Score is a lowly 2, so maybe that is the reason. In any event, I plan to try again another time.
Go up some posts (POST #185) and see JonNYC's link to some doc's that confirm the general process and other good information.
#190
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
NOT all members get the same thing, and, best to call with 150k EQPs under one's belt, generally speaking.
#191
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 8,937
I was denied additional SWUs last night. The agent was not familiar with any additional SWU program for additional points. He also asked his colleagues apparently. I currently have 146k points (and 116k miles). I found out my Eagle Score is a lowly 2, so maybe that is the reason. In any event, I plan to try again another time.
Also, I'm surprised that the agent told you your helix score. Did you just ask?
#192
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 1,792
But, then, you do have to fly United, something I gave up on this year, after many years of hitting well over1K each year (and now 2.5 million miles) and getting progressively deteriorating service.
Over at DL, they'll roll over extra elite qualifying miles as far in advance as one may wants. No need to call for anything.
Not sure if either of these carriers does "helix".
#193
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Over at UA, when one goes to thresholds 125K, 150k, 175K, 200k, and on, nobody needs to call. No favorites are played. No need to cajole an agent or use hang up and call back strategy. They have a computer programmed to spit the upgrades (regionals, SWU's) out to any and everyone who meets the threshold. Been doing it for a while.
But, then, you do have to fly United, something I gave up on this year, after many years of hitting well over1K each year (and now 2.5 million miles) and getting progressively deteriorating service.
Over at DL, they'll roll over extra elite qualifying miles as far in advance as one may wants. No need to call for anything.
Not sure if either of these carriers does "helix".
But, then, you do have to fly United, something I gave up on this year, after many years of hitting well over1K each year (and now 2.5 million miles) and getting progressively deteriorating service.
Over at DL, they'll roll over extra elite qualifying miles as far in advance as one may wants. No need to call for anything.
Not sure if either of these carriers does "helix".
#194
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Programs: Alaska FF
Posts: 302
#195
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,764
I'm at 165K EQPs this year and have received nothing. Maybe worth noting that I haven't used any SWUs because I've been flying paid F all year; but I don't know that likelihood of being used is a factor in the algorithm.