Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 19, 2017, 10:25 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: 24left
Jan 18 2021 TC issues Airworthiness Directive for the 737 MAX
Link to post https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32976892-post4096.html

Cabin photos

Post 976 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29534462-post976.html
Post 1300 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29780203-post1300.html

Cabin Layout

Interior Specs can be found here https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/home/fly/onboard/fleet.html







- Window seats may feel narrower to come as the armrests are placed "into" the "curvature" of the cabin.
- Seats with no windows feel even more narrower as there is no space created by the curvature of window.
- All bulkhead seats have very limited legroom.
- Seats 15A, 16A, 16F, 17A and 17F have limited windows.
- Exit rows 19 and 20 have more legroom than regular preferred seats.

Routes

The 737 MAX is designated to replace the A320-series. Based on announcements and schedule updates, the following specific routes will be operated by the 737 MAX in future:

YYZ-LAX (periodic flights)
YYZ-SNN (new route)
YUL-DUB (new route)
YYZ/YUL-KEF (replacing Rouge A319)
YYT-LHR (replacing Mainline A319)
YHZ-LHR (replacing Mainline B767)
Hawaii Routes YVR/YYC (replacing Rouge B767)
Many domestic trunk routes (YYZ, YVR, YUL, YYC) now operated by 7M8, replacing A320 family
Print Wikipost

Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2019, 4:35 pm
  #3346  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Halifax
Programs: AC SE100K, Marriott Lifetime Platinum Elite. NEXUS
Posts: 4,570
Originally Posted by WildcatYXU
To get the B737 certified again and back into the air is essential.
Essential to whom? If AC cancels EYW, then that will free up 20% global seat capacity overnight /s

But seriously, "uneconomical" aircraft become economical; uneconomical refurbs become economical (until hull death). And prices go up, reducing demand.

The Airbus' that do roll off the production will fly at 2am to allow low price capacity.


It would be nice if there wasn't a monopoly on 150-200 seat aircraft, but when one option of the duopoly murders the passengers, I'm not sure the economic better option is better.
RangerNS is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2019, 4:44 pm
  #3347  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355
Originally Posted by RangerNS
Essential to whom? If AC cancels EYW, then that will free up 20% global seat capacity overnight /s

But seriously, "uneconomical" aircraft become economical; uneconomical refurbs become economical (until hull death). And prices go up, reducing demand.

The Airbus' that do roll off the production will fly at 2am to allow low price capacity.


It would be nice if there wasn't a monopoly on 150-200 seat aircraft, but when one option of the duopoly murders the passengers, I'm not sure the economic better option is better.
And if airlines face constraints on 150-200 seat aircraft, they can adapt their schedules to fly bigger birds less frequently. JL and NH used to fly high density 747s on flights of < 2 hours because of airport capacity constraints. I would be happy to fly AC 777s and 787s on less frequent schedules with the same capacity between YVR and points east.
pitz likes this.
transportprof is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2019, 4:44 pm
  #3348  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,746
It doesn't exactly fill me with confidence if Boeing can't program the simulator to reflect what the actual aircraft will do.
Twickenham likes this.
Jagboi is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2019, 6:07 pm
  #3349  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: TK *G
Posts: 3,099
Originally Posted by transportprof
And if airlines face constraints on 150-200 seat aircraft, they can adapt their schedules to fly bigger birds less frequently. JL and NH used to fly high density 747s on flights of < 2 hours because of airport capacity constraints. I would be happy to fly AC 777s and 787s on less frequent schedules with the same capacity between YVR and points east.
+1. Only place we really need 150-200 seat aircraft are routes flying to/from airports can not handle larger aircrafts, or routes with low demand. In other words, the demand is somewhat elastic. Once airlines realize that there will be a shortage of such aircrafts for a long time, I am sure they will adapt accordingly.
songsc is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 4:15 am
  #3350  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by Jagboi
It doesn't exactly fill me with confidence if Boeing can't program the simulator to reflect what the actual aircraft will do.
Boeing does not make simulations. CAE (from Montreal) and their various competitors make the simulators.
Fiordland is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 4:19 am
  #3351  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by songsc
+1. Only place we really need 150-200 seat aircraft are routes flying to/from airports can not handle larger aircrafts, or routes with low demand. In other words, the demand is somewhat elastic. Once airlines realize that there will be a shortage of such aircrafts for a long time, I am sure they will adapt accordingly.
There was a time when Air Canada ran the 747 between Vancouver and Toronto.

A time just after the Canadian and AC merger where they ran the 767-300 between Vancouver and Ottawa for the morning and evening flight. The noon flight was a DC-9 with a stop in Winnipeg. Lots of routes like this were there are alternatives to what is a steady A320 and 737 route.
Fiordland is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 6:55 am
  #3352  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: Aeroplan Elite for life; Fairmont Platinum; Delta Platinum Plus
Posts: 324
https://www.perell.com/blog/boeing-737-max

Interesting read on corporate culture of McDonnell-Douglas causing the 737 Max problems.
MQS007 is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 7:17 am
  #3353  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mississauga Ontario
Posts: 4,105
Interesting update today.

https://www.airlive.net/boeing-publi...rn-to-service/
InTheAirGuy is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 8:48 am
  #3354  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Posted in the last 16 minutes.....



24left is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 9:00 am
  #3355  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,746
Originally Posted by Fiordland
Boeing does not make simulations. CAE (from Montreal) and their various competitors make the simulators.
I know Boeing doesn't manufacture simulators, but presumably for a prototype aircraft Boeing is the only people who know how it flies and can determine it's characteristics, that isn't something CAE can independently determine. CAE had to rely on data from Boeing as a minimum, and if Boeing supplied wrong or inaccurate information then the sim won't reflect reality. Either way, a sim isn't much use if it has errors and doesn't behave as the actual airplane does.
Jagboi is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 9:12 am
  #3356  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,805
Originally Posted by Jagboi
I know Boeing doesn't manufacture simulators, but presumably for a prototype aircraft Boeing is the only people who know how it flies and can determine it's characteristics, that isn't something CAE can independently determine. CAE had to rely on data from Boeing as a minimum, and if Boeing supplied wrong or inaccurate information then the sim won't reflect reality. Either way, a sim isn't much use if it has errors and doesn't behave as the actual airplane does.
There is some truth in that. OTOH simulators are primarily training tools, and as such, they should be expected to reproduce accurately known situations as needed for training. It would be unreasonable to expect simulators to truthfully reproduce unanticipated parts of the envelope, except perhaps to the extent that the real computer stuff is directly incorporated and the plane reaction is precisely as anticipated in the software development. Yet we see times and again, and even by pilots, an expectation that testing outside the envelope scenarios in the simulator would shed light to potential real scenarios. Which makes no sense. Simulators are training tools, not predictive tools for unknown scenarios.
etkuo likes this.
Stranger is online now  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 11:02 am
  #3357  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Halifax
Programs: AC SE100K, Marriott Lifetime Platinum Elite. NEXUS
Posts: 4,570
By "this quarter" they mean "fourth quarter", just unclear on which year.
RangerNS is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 12:05 pm
  #3358  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,353
Originally Posted by RangerNS
By "this quarter" they mean "fourth quarter", just unclear on which year.
That joke has been overplayed, and you're stretching it way too far now.

In no sense could "this quarter" mean "Q4 2020".
canadiancow is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 2:24 pm
  #3359  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877




EDIT TO ADD:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1X22H0






QUOTES:


"The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must work to restore “public confidence” in aircraft certification efforts after two deadly Boeing 737 MAX crashes, the U.S. Transportation Department’s inspector general said on Wednesday in a report seen by Reuters.

......The report, dated Oct. 23 but not yet publicly released, said the FAA faces a “significant oversight challenge” to ensure that companies conducting those tasks “maintain high standards and comply with FAA safety regulations.”



Also, you know, the AC livery really stands out in a flock.


Last edited by 24left; Oct 23, 2019 at 2:34 pm
24left is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2019, 10:05 pm
  #3360  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: YVR
Programs: AC E50K, NEXUS
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by RangerNS
By "this quarter" they mean "fourth quarter", just unclear on which year.
Originally Posted by canadiancow
That joke has been overplayed, and you're stretching it way too far now.

In no sense could "this quarter" mean "Q4 2020".
According to Boeing earnings call: still hopes for 4Q recertification

Boeing earnings call: still hopes for 4Q recertification

DOWNLOAD
Oct. 23, 2019, © Leeham News: Boeing reaffirmed its belief that the Federal Aviation Administration will authorize a return to service for the grounded 737 MAX this quarter.
bimmerdriver is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.